*Relationship Between Creativity and Intelligence: A Multimethod Investigation of Alternative Theoretical Assumptions in Two Samples of Secondary School Students

Abstract

The threshold hypothesis and the necessary-but-not-sufficient hypothesis represent popular views on the relationship between intelligence and creativity. However, most studies investigating these hypotheses used suboptimal or even inappropriate statistical methods, calling into question the robustness of the available evidence. The ability differentiation hypothesis presents a third theoretical view on the relationship, but ability differentiation studies including creativity measures are scarce. In this study, the relationship between fluid intelligence as a core element of intelligence and divergent thinking as an important indicator of creativity was investigated in two large samples of secondary school students in Germany (N = 1,328, M_age = 14.47; N = 524, M_age = 13.77). Four different statistical approaches were applied (i.e., test for heteroscedasticity, segmented regression analysis, local structural equation modeling, and necessary-but-not-sufficient condition analysis). The results did not support the threshold hypothesis or a nonlinear relationship as predicted by ability differentiation hypothesis and only partially supported the necessary-but-not-sufficient hypothesis.

Keywords

creativity intelligence threshold hypothesis necessary-but-not-sufficient

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akhtar

Kartika

(2019). Intelligence and creativity: An investigation of threshold theory and its implications. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 9(1), 131–138.

Amabile

T. M.

(1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357

Anderson

J. E.

(1960). The nature of abilities. In Torrance

E. P.

(Ed.), Education and talent (pp. 9–31). University of Minnesota Press.

Breit

Brunner

Preckel

(2020). General intelligence and specific cognitive abilities in adolescence: Tests of age differentiation, ability differentiation, and their interaction in two large samples. Developmental Psychology, 56, 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000876

Breit

Brunner

Preckel

(2021). Age and ability differentiation in children: A review and empirical investigation. Developmental Psychology, 57(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001147

Breusch

T. S.

Pagan

A. R.

(1979). A simple test for heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294. https://doi.org/0012-9682(197909)47:5<1287:ASTFHA>2.0.CO;2-9

Caemmerer

J. M.

Keith

T. Z.

Reynolds

M. R.

(2020). Beyond individual intelligence tests: Application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Intelligence, 79, 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101433

Carroll

J. B.

(1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.

Davies

R. B.

(2002). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative: Linear model case. Biometrika, 89(2), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/89.2.484

10.

Demetriou

Spanoudis

Kazi

Mouyi

Žebec

M. S.

Kazali

Golino

Bakracevic

Shayer

(2017). Developmental differentiation and binding of mental processes with g through the life-span. Journal of Intelligence, 5(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020023

11.

Detterman

D. K.

(1999). The psychology of mental retardation. International Review of Psychiatry, 11(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540269974492

12.

Dul

(2016). Necessary condition analysis (NCA) logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 10–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115584005

13.

Feist

G. J.

Barron

F. X.

(2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6

14.

Funke

(2012). Complex problem solving. In Seel

N. M.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 682–685). Springer.

15.

Gagné

(2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2. Aufl., pp. 98–119). Cambridge University Press.

16.

Gajda

Karwowski

Beghetto

R. A.

(2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133

17.

Gerwig

Miroshnik

Forthmann

Benedek

Karwowski

Holling

(2021). The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking—A meta-analytic update. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020023

18.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3

19.

Guilford

J. P.

(1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755

20.

Guilford

J. P.

(1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw Hill.

21.

Guilford

J. P.

(1968). Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. EDITS/Knapp.

22.

Guilford

J. P.

Christensen

P. R.

(1973). The one-way relation between creative potential and IQ. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1973.tb01096.x

23.

Gustafsson

J.-E.

(1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(84)90008-4

24.

Hildebrandt

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

Sommer

Wilhelm

(2016). Exploring factor model parameters across continuous variables with local structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 257–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1142856

25.

Hildebrandt

Wilhelm

Robitzsch

(2009). Complementary and competing factor analytic approaches for the investigation of measurement invariance. Review of Psychology, 16(2), 87–102.

26.

Hox

(2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.

27.

Ilagan

M. J.

Patungan

(2018). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: On methodology for necessity and sufficiency. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000050

28.

Jäger

A. O.

(1984). Intelligenzstrukturforschung: Konkurrierende Modelle, neue Entwicklungen, Perspektiven [Intelligence structure research: Competing models, new developments, perspectives]. Psychologische Rundschau.

29.

Jäger

A. O.

Holling

Preckel

Schulze

Vock

Süß

H.-M.

Beauducel

(2006). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB) [Berlin structure of intelligence test for youth: Assessment of talent and giftedness]. Hogrefe. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.4.221

30.

Jauk

Benedek

Dunst

Neubauer

A. C.

(2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003

31.

Karwowski

Dul

Gralewski

Jauk

Jankowska

D. M.

Gajda

Chruszczewski

M. H.

Benedek

(2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006

32.

Karwowski

Gralewski

(2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.003

33.

Karwowski

Kaufman

J. C.

Lebuda

Szumski

Firkowska-Mankiewicz

(2017). Intelligence in childhood and creative achievements in middle-age: The necessary condition approach. Intelligence, 64, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.001

34.

Kerr

Vuyk

M. A.

(2013). Career development for creatively gifted students. In Kim

K. H.

Kaufman

J. C.

Baer

Sriraman

(Eds.), Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 137–151). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8_10

35.

Kim

K. H.

(2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473

36.

Kim

K. H.

(2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x

37.

Kovacs

Conway

A. R.

(2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2016.1153946

38.

Lubinski

Webb

R. M.

Morelock

M. J.

Benbow

C. P.

(2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718

39.

Lubinski

(2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476

40.

Maas

C. J. M.

Hox

J. J.

(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86

41.

Major

J. T.

Johnson

Bouchard

T. J.

(2011). The dependability of the general factor of intelligence: Why small, single-factor models do not adequately represent g. Intelligence, 39(5), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.07.002

42.

Molenaar

Dolan

C. V.

Wicherts

J. M.

van der Maas

H. L. J.

(2010). Modeling differentiation of cognitive abilities within the higher-order factor model using moderated factor analysis. Intelligence, 38(6), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.002

43.

Molenaar

Kő

Rózsa

Mészáros

(2017). Differentiation of cognitive abilities in the WAIS-IV at the item level. Intelligence, 65, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.004

44.

Muggeo

V. M.

(2008). Segmented: An R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News, 8(1), 20–25.

45.

Murray

A. L.

Dixon

Johnson

(2013). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns: A statistical artifact? Intelligence, 41(5), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.007

46.

Piirto

(2004). Understanding creativity. Great Potential Press.

47.

Plucker

J. A.

Esping

(2015). Intelligence and creativity: A complex but important relationship. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9374-9

48.

Plucker

J. A.

Makel

M. C.

(2010). Assessment of creativity. In Kaufman

J. C.

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.005

49.

Preckel

Holling

Wiese

(2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.022

50.

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/

51.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200821

52.

Reynolds

M. R.

(2013). Interpreting the g loadings of intelligence test composite scores in light of Spearman’s law of diminishing returns. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000013

53.

Robitzsch

(2022). Package “sirt.” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sirt/sirt.pdf

54.

Rosseel

(2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.

55.

Runco

M. A.

(1991). Divergent thinking. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

56.

Runco

M. A.

Acar

(2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929

57.

Runco

M. A.

Albert

R. S.

(1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11(4), 212–218.

58.

Runco

M. A.

Jaeger

G. J.

(2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

59.

Ryan

S. E.

Porth

L. S.

(2007). A tutorial on the piecewise regression approach applied to bedload transport data. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-189

60.

Schneider

W. J.

(2000). Giftedness, expertise, and (exceptional) performance: A developmental perspective. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 165–178). Elsevier Science.

61.

Schneider

W. J.

McGrew

K. S.

(2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan

D. P.

McDonough

E. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–162). Guilford.

62.

Schoppe

K. J.

(1975). Verbaler Kreativitätstest (VKT) [Verbal Creativity Tests (VKT)]. Hogrefe.

63.

Shi

Wang

Yang

Zhang

(2017). Relationship between divergent thinking and intelligence: An empirical study of the threshold hypothesis with Chinese children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00254

64.

Simonton

D. K.

(2018). From giftedness to eminence: Developmental landmarks across the lifespan. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

Shaunessy-Dedrick

Foley-Nicpon

(Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 273–285). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-018

65.

Sligh

A. C.

Conners

F. A.

Roskos-Ewoldsen

(2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01254.x

66.

Spearman

(1927). The abilities of man. Macmillan.

67.

Strenze

(2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35(5), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004

68.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/e665862012-001

69.

Thompson

J. A.

Davey

Fielding

Hargreaves

J. R.

Hayes

R. J.

(2018). Robust analysis of stepped wedge trials using cluster-level summaries within periods. Statistics in Medicine, 37(16), 2487–2500. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7668

70.

Torrance

E. P.

(1962). Guiding creative talent. Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1037/13134-000

71.

Torrance

E. P.

(1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B-figural tests, forms A and B. Personnel Press.

72.

Tucker-Drob

E. M.

(2009). Differentiation of cognitive abilities across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1097–1118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015864

73.

van der Maas

H. L. J.

Dolan

C. V.

Grasman

R. P. P. P.

Wicherts

J. M.

Huizinga

H. M.

Raijmakers

M. E. J

. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.842

74.

Vock

Preckel

Holling

(2011). Mental abilities and school achievement: A test of a mediation hypothesis. Intelligence, 39(5), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.006

75.

Wallach

M. A.

Kogan

(1965). Modes of thinking in young children. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

76.

Wang

De Gruttola

(2017). The use of permutation tests for the analysis of parallel and stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine, 36(18), 2831–2843. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7329

77.

Weinstein

J. B.

Bobko

(1980). The relationship between creativity and androgyny when moderated by an intelligence threshold. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(4), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628002400406

78.

Weiss

Steger

Schroeders

Wilhelm

(2020). A reappraisal of the threshold hypothesis of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8040038

79.

Zaboski

B. A.

Kranzler

J. H.

Gage

N. A.

(2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Journal of School Psychology, 71, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.001

80.

Zeileis

Lumley

Berger

Graham

(2022). R package “sandwich”. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sandwich/sandwich.pdf

81.

Zeng

Proctor

R. W.

Salvendy

(2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713