Personality plays a powerful role in predicting how individuals react to life events and evaluate their overall well-being. Similarly, implicit beliefs of ability determine the ways individuals react to experiences of success and failure. The present article reports the findings from two studies on the relationships between personality, implicit theories of ability, and subjective well-being among high-ability university students. Study 1 employed a variable-centered approach to examine well-being in relation to individual differences in Big Five personality traits and implicit theories. Study 2 moved beyond a variable-oriented focus to explore personality profiles among another (but similar) sample of high-ability adolescents through a person-centered analytic approach and identify associations of the emerging profiles with well-being and implicit theories. Findings were discussed in light of replicable personality prototypes and in relationship to previous research with high-ability students.
AkseJ.HaleW. W.IIIEngelsR. C. M. E.RaaijmakersQ. A. W.MeeusW. H. J. (2007). Stability and change in personality type membership and anxiety in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 30(5), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.09.007
2.
AndermanE. M. (2012). Adolescence. In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching (pp. 43–61). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13275-003
3.
AnglimJ.HorwoodS.SmillieL. D.MarreroR. J.WoodJ. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226
AsendorpfJ. B. (2002). Editorial: The puzzle of personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.446
6.
AsendorpfJ. B.BorkenauP.OstendorfF.van AkenM. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15(3), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.408
7.
AsendorpfJ. B.CaspiA.HofsteeW. K. B. (2002). The puzzle of personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), 1–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.446
BaileyT. H.PhillipsL. J. (2015). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474
10.
BarbaranelliC. (2002). Cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO-Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.449
BaudsonT. G.PreckelF. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000011
13.
BeckerG. (1978). The mad genius controversy: A study in the sociology of deviance. SAGE.
14.
BlackwellK. L.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
15.
BlockJ. (1971). Lives through time. Bancroft Books.
16.
BredemeierK.BerenbaumH.MostS. B.SimonsD. J. (2011). Links between neuroticism, emotional distress, and disengaging attention: Evidence from a single-target RSVP task. Cognition and Emotion, 25(8), 1510–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.549460
17.
BurnetteJ. L.O’BoyleE. H.VanEppsE. M.PollackJ. M.FinkelE. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531
18.
BurnetteJ. L.PollackJ. M. (2013). Implicit theories of work and job fit: Implications for job and life satisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(4), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.803964
19.
ChanD. W. (2012). Life satisfaction, happiness, and the growth mindset of healthy and unhealthy perfectionists among Hong Kong Chinese gifted students. Roeper Review, 34, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.715333
20.
ChapmanB. P.GoldbergL. R. (2011). Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024289
21.
CimpianA.ArceH.-M. C.MarkmanE. M.DweckC. S. (2007). Subtle linguistic cues affect children’s motivation. Psychological Science, 18(4), 314–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01896.x
CloningerC. R.CloningerK. (2011). Person-centred therapeutics. The International Journal of Person Centred Medicine, 1, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v1i1.21
24.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
25.
CostaP. T.Jr.HerbstJ. H.McCraeR. R.SamuelsJ.OzerD. (2002). The replicability and utility of the three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.448
26.
CrossJ. R.O’ReillyC.KimM.MammadovS.CrossT. L. (2015). Social coping and self-concept among young gifted students in Ireland and the United States: A cross-cultural study. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1031881
27.
CrossJ. R.VaughnC. T.MammadovS.CrossT. L.KimM.O’ReillyC.SpielhagenF. R.Da CostaM. P.HymerB. (2019). A cross-cultural study of the social experience of giftedness. Roeper Review, 41(4), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1661052
28.
CrossT. L.CrossJ. R.MammadovS.WardT.NeumeisterK. S.AndersenL. (2018). Psychological heterogeneity among honors college students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 242–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218781754
29.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1992). The psychology of happiness. Rider.
30.
CuryF.Da FonsecaD.ZahnI.ElliotA. (2008). Implicit theories and IQ test performance: A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.003
31.
DenissenJ. J. A.AsendorpfJ. B.van AkenM. A. G. (2008). Childhood personality predicts long-term trajectories of shyness and aggressiveness in the context of demographic transitions in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality, 76(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00480.x
DienerE.Iran-NejadA. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1031
34.
DienerE.LucasR. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). Russell SAGE Foundation.
35.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
36.
DienerE. D.OishiS.LucasR. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
37.
DolanP.PeasgoodT.WhiteM. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001
38.
DonnellanB. M.RobinsR. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x
39.
DubasJ. S.GerrisJ. R. M.JanssensJ. M. A. M.VermulstA. A. (2002). Personality types of adolescents: Concurrent correlates, antecedents, and type x parenting interactions. Journal of Adolescence, 25(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0450
40.
DweckC. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077149
41.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.HongY. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
42.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
43.
EcclesJ.MidgleyC.BuchananC. M.WigfieldA.ReumanD.FlanaganC.IverD. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
44.
FeltmanR.RobinsonM. D.OdeS. (2009). Mindfulness as a moderator of neuroticism-outcome relations: A self-regulation perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.009
45.
FergusonS. L. G.MooreE. W.HullD. M. (2020). Finding latent groups in observed data: A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419881721
46.
FettermanA. K.RobinsonM. D.OdeS.GordonK. H. (2010). Neuroticism as a risk factor for behavioral dysregulation: A mindfulness-mediation perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.3.301
47.
FurrR. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioral science. European Journal of Personality, 23(5), 369–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.724
48.
GarnA. C.MatthewsM. S.JollyJ. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210377657
49.
GerlachM.FarbB.RevelleW.AmaralL. A. N. (2018). A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nature Human Behavior, 2(10), 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0419-z
GlinskiK.PageA. (2010). Modifiability of neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness by group cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder. Behavior Change, 27(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.27.1.42
52.
GoldbergL. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 141–165.
53.
GomezR.GomezA.CooperA. (2002). Neuroticism and extraversion as predictors of negative and positive emotional information processing: Comparing Eysenck’s, Gray’s and Newman’s theories. European Journal of Personality, 16(5), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.459
54.
GrossJ. J.SuttonS. K.KetelaarT. (1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298243005
55.
HaleW. W.IIIRaaijmakersQ.MurisP.Van HoofA.MeeusW. H. J. (2009). One factor or two parallel processes? Comorbidity and development of adolescent anxiety and depressive disorder symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(10), 1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02115.x
56.
HaysR. D.WellsK. B.SherbourneC. D.RogersW.SpritzerK. (1995). Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illnesses. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950130011002
57.
HeidemeierH.GöritzA. S. (2016). The instrumental role of personality traits: Using mixture structural equation modeling to investigate individual differences in the relationships between the Big Five traits and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2595–2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9708-7
58.
HerzbergP. Y.RothM. (2006). Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? An extension of personality prototype research. European Journal of Personality, 20(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.557
59.
HillsP.ArgyleM. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6
60.
JefferysH. (1998). The theory of probability. OUP Oxford.
61.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07550-000
62.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
63.
LaheyB. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309
64.
LeikasS.Salmela-AroK. (2014). Personality types during transition to young adulthood: How are they related to life situation and well-being?Journal of Adolescence, 37(5), 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.01.003
65.
LimontW.Dreszer-DrogorόbJ.BedyńskaS.ŚliwińskaK.JastrzębskaD. (2014). “Old wine in new bottles?” Relationships between overexcitabilities, the Big Five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.003
LucasR. E.FujitaF. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1039
68.
LuhmannM.EidM. (2009). Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015809
69.
MammadovS. (2021a). A comparison of creativity-relevant personal characteristics in adolescents across personality profiles. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.451
70.
MammadovS. (2021b). Individual differences in personality among cognitively advanced learners. In MillerE. M.MatthewsM. S.DixsonD. D. (Eds.), The development of the high ability child: Psychological perspectives on giftedness (p. 21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025443-8
71.
MammadovS.HertzogN.MunR. U. (2018). An examination of self-determination within alumni of an early college entrance program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218781745
72.
MasynK. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In LittleT. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods: Vol. 2. Statistical analysis (pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199934898.013.0025
73.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). Guilford Press.
74.
McLaughlinC. (2008). Emotional well-being and its relationship to schools and classrooms: A critical reflection. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 36(4), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880802364486
75.
MeeusW.van de SchootR.KlimstraT.BranjeS. (2011). Personality types in adolescence: Change and stability and links with adjustment and relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1181–1195. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023816
76.
MillerA. L.Speirs NeumeisterK. L. (2017). The influence of styles, and perfectionism on performance goal orientation in high ability students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17730567
77.
MofieldE. L.Parker PetersM. (2015). The relationship between perfectionism and overexcitabilities in gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607324
78.
MorinA. J. S.MeyerJ. P.CreusierJ.BiétryF. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621148
79.
MõttusR. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait-outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041
NeihartM.YeoL. S. (2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In PfeifferS. I.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley-NicponM. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 497–510). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-032
83.
NewbyJ.PituraV. A.PenneyA. M.KleinR. G.FlettG. L.HewittP. L. (2017). Neuroticism and perfectionism as predictors of social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 106(1), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.057
84.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthnB. O. (2007a). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
85.
Nylund-GibsonK.ChoiA. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
86.
Nylund-GibsonK.GarberA. C.SinghJ.WitkowM. R.NishinaA.BellmoreA. (2021). The utility of latent class analysis to understand heterogeneity in youth’s coping strategies: A methodological introduction. OSFpreprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/t8ver
87.
OishiS.SchimmackU. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019389
88.
PeetersJ.De BackerF.ReinaV. R.KindekensA.BuffelT.LombaertsK. (2014). The role of teachers’ self-regulatory capacities in the implementation of self-regulated learning practices. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.504
89.
RammstedtB.RiemannR.AngleitnerA.BorkenauP. (2004). Resilients, overcontrollers, and undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants. European Journal of Personality, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.495
90.
RastP.HoferS. M.SparksC. (2012). Modeling individual differences in within-person variation of negative and positive affect in a mixed effects location scale model using BUGS/JAGS. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.658328
91.
RatchfordJ. L.WilliamsE. G.BisharaL.HoultbergB. J.SchnitkerS. A. (2021). Mindset as characteristic adaptations: Using response surface analysis to assess mindset in the personality system. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 701510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701510
92.
RinnA. N.SolesK. L.FergusonS.SmithK. N. (2020). Psychological profiles among high ability undergraduate students. High Ability Studies, 31(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1607721
93.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3
94.
RobinsR. W.JohnO. P.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.Stouthamer-LoeberM. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157
95.
RobinsR. W.PalsJ. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805
96.
RobinsR. W.TracyJ. L. (2003). Setting an agenda for a person-centered approach to personality development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2003.06801012.x
97.
RobinsonM. D.OdeS.MoellerS. K.GoetzP. W. (2007). Neuroticism and affective priming: Evidence for a neuroticism-linked negative schema. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1221–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.027
98.
RushJ.HoferS. M. (2014). Differences in within- and between-person factor structure of positive and negative affect: Analysis of two intensive measurement studies using multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035666
99.
RustingC. L.LarsenR. J. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(5), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00246-2
100.
SakU. (2004). A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-449
101.
SatchellL.HoskinsS.CorrP.MooreR. (2017). Ruminating on the nature of intelligence: Personality predicts implicit theories and educational persistence. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.025
102.
ScagerK.AkkermanS.KeesenF.MainhardM. T.PilotA.WubbelsT. (2012). Do honors students have more potential for excellence in their professional lives?Higher Education, 64, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9478-z
103.
SchimmackU.OishiS. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.395
104.
SchultzR. A.DelisleJ. A. (2003). Gifted adolescents. In ColangeloN.DavisC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 483–492). Allyn & Bacon.
105.
SpechtJ.LuhmannM.GeiserC. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036863
106.
SpinathB.SpinathF. M.RiemannR.AngleitnerA. (2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00310-0
107.
SteeleP.SchmidtJ.ShultzJ. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
108.
StevensJ. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science. Erlbaum.
109.
StoeberJ.OttoK. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_2
110.
SunJ.KaufmanS. B.SmillieL. D. (2018). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12301
111.
VizeC. E.CollisonK. L.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2019). Using Bayesian methods to update and expand the meta-analytic evidence of the five-factor model’s relation to antisocial behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 67, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.001
112.
VuykM. A.KrieshokT. S.KerrB. A. (2016). Openness to experience rather than overexcitabilities: Call it like it is. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216645407
113.
WeiM.LiaoY.-H.KuT.-Y.ShafferP. A. (2011). Attachment, self-compassion, empathy, and subjective well-being among college students and community adults. Journal of Personality, 79(1), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00677.x
114.
YueL.DajunZ.YinghaoL.TianqiangH. (2016). Meta-analysis of the relationship between life events and depression in adolescents. Journal of Pediatrics & Neonatal Care, 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-805X.100008
115.
ZeidnerM.Shani-ZinovichI. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the Big-Five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.007
116.
ZengG.HouH.PengK. (2016). Effect of growth mindset on school engagement and psychological well-being of Chinese primary and middle school students: The mediating role of resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01873
