State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998

Abstract

This study surveyed 1,234 empirical studies on giftedness, gifted education, and creativity during 1998—2010 (April), using PsycINFO database and targeted journals as main sources, with respect to main topics these studies focused on, methods they used for investigation, and the conceptual spaces they traversed. Four main research topics emerged from the survey: creativity/creatively gifted, achievement/underachievement, identification, and talent development. Rich and broad conceptual spaces linking these four categories to their psychological underpinnings and educational implications have been explored by this body of research, though the conceptual spaces are still too loosely organized to be seen as paradigmatic. Several prominent trends are identified, including the emergent qualitative studies (accounting for a quarter of the total studies) and the dominance of descriptive (comparative and correlational) research. Although most psychosocial studies are conducted in the context of gifted education, there still seems to be a gap between theory and practice, between psychological understanding of gifted development and promoting such development through education. More systematic, sustainable programs of research and more coordination among researchers are warranted to move the field forward.

Keywords

philosophical/theoretical qualitative methodologies evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambrose, D. , VanTassel-Baska, J. , Coleman, L.J. , & Cross, T. ( 2006, November). Unified-insular-firmly policed or fractured-contested-porous gifted education? In D. Ambrose (Chair), Reaching for rigor and relevance. Symposium conducted at the annual convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Charlotte, NC.

Amidzic, O. , Riehle, H.J. , & Elbert, T. ( 2006). Toward a psychophysiology of expertise: Focal magnetic gamma bursts as a signature of memory chunks and the aptitude of chess players . Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 253-258.

Borland, J. H. (Eds.). (2003). Rethinking gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Callahan, C.M. , & Moon, T.R. ( 2007). Sorting the wheat from the chaff. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 305-319.

Cohen, L.M. ( 2006). Conceptual foundations for gifted education: Stock-taking . Roeper Review, 28, 91-110.

Coleman, L.J. , Guo, A. , & Dabbs, C.S. ( 2007). The state of qualitative research in gifted education as published in American journals. Gifted Child Quarterly , 51, 51-63.

Cronbach, L.J. ( 1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.

Dai, D.Y. ( 2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Ericsson, K.A. ( 2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson , N. Charness , P. J. Feltovich , & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683-703). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Ericsson, K.A. , Nandagopal, K. , & Roring, R.W. ( 2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 287-311.

11.

Ericsson, K.A. , Nandagopal, K. , & Roring, R.W. ( 2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3-55.

12.

Friedman-Nimz, R. , O’Brien, B. , & Frey, B.B. ( 2004). Examining our foundations: Implications for gifted education research. Roeper Review, 28, 45-52.

13.

Gagné, F. ( 2009). Debating giftedness: Pronat vs. antinat. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 155-198). New York, NY: Springer.

14.

Hébert, T.P. ( 2001). "If I had a new notebook, I know things would change": Bright underachieving young men in urban classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 174-194.

15.

Horowitz, F. D. , Subotnik, R. , & Matthews, D. (Eds.). (2009). The development of giftedness and talent across the life span. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

16.

Jolly, J.L. , & Kettler, T. ( 2008). Gifted education research 1994-2003: A disconnect between priorities and practice. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 427-446.

17.

Kaufman, J.C. , Gentile, C.A. , & Baer, J. ( 2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 260-265.

18.

Kuhn, T.S. ( 1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

19.

Plucker, J. A. , & Callahan, C. M. (Eds.). (2008). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Austin, TX : Prufrock Press.

20.

Robinson, A. , Shore, B.M. , & Enersen, D.L. ( 2007). Best practices in gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

21.

Ross, P.O. ( 1993, October). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

22.

Shavinina, L. (Ed.). (2009). International handbook on giftedness. New York, NY: Springer.

23.

Stokes, D.E. ( 1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.

24.

Treffinger, D.J. ( 2009). Guest editorial. Gifted Child Quarterly , 53, 229-232.

25.

Treffinger, D.J. , & Feldhusen, J.F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181-193.

26.

VanTassel-Baska, J. ( 2006). NAGC symposium: A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 339-341.

27.

Ziegler, A. , & Raul, T. ( 2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness . High Ability Studies, 11, 113-136.

State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998—2010 (April)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References