With the prevalence of gifted students in general education classrooms, all teachers will be responsible for providing appropriate programming for them, resulting in a need for training in the education of the gifted to be introduced at the preservice level. In this study, the researchers investigated the effectiveness of a combined intervention strategy for preservice teachers, consisting of a course in the education of the gifted and an accompanying 9-week practicum, in increasing participants’ understanding of the characteristics and needs of gifted students. Through semistructured interviews, participants’ perceptions of the effects the interventions had on their understanding of gifted students’ characteristics and needs were examined. The findings from the interviews were triangulated with classroom observations, lesson plans, and participant responses to the Survey of Practices with Students of Varying Needs. Participants perceived an increase in their understanding of the needs and characteristics of gifted students through participation in the interventions as well as increased confidence in their general teaching abilities. Implications of the study for teacher education and future research are discussed.
Archambault, F.X., Jr. , Westberg, K.L., Brown, S.W., Hallmark, B.W., Zhang, W., & Emmons, C.L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
2.
Bangel, N. ( 2004) Growth as a professional through teaching in Super Saturday. Unpublished masters thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
3.
Bangel, N., Enersen, D., Capobianco, B., & Moon, S.M. ( 2006). Professional development of preservice teachers: Teaching in the Super Saturday Program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 339-361.
Cramer, R.H. ( 1991). The education of gifted children in the United States: A Delphi study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 84-91.
6.
Cross, J.A., & Dobbs, C. ( 1987). Goals of a teacher training program for teachers of the gifted. Roeper Review, 9, 170-171.
7.
Dettmer, P. ( 1993). Gifted education: window of opportunity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 92-94.
8.
Feldhusen, J.F. ( 1985). The teacher of gifted students. Gifted Education International, 3, 87-93.
9.
Feldhusen, J.F. ( 1986). The Purdue Three-Stage Enrichment Model for gifted education at the elementary level. In. J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 153-179). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
10.
Feldhusen, J.F. ( 1991). Saturday and summer programs. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 197-208). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Feldhusen, J.F. ( 1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In: N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 547-555). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Huffman, L. ( 1988). Practicum experiences in an educational program for teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12(1), 34-45.
13.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Kolloff, P.B. ( 1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 126-152). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
14.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Kolloff, P.B. ( 1988, January/February). A three-stage model for gifted education . Gifted Child Today, 14-18.
15.
Feldhusen, J.F., & Ruckman, D.R. ( 1988). A guide to the development of Saturday programs for gifted and talented youth. Gifted Child Today, 11, 56-61.
Hanninen, G.E. ( 1988). A study of teacher training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10, 139-144.
18.
Hansen, J.B. ( 1988). The relationships of skills and classroom climate of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.j
19.
Hansen, J.B., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1990). Off campus training of teachers of the gifted: A program model. Gifted International , 6, 54-62.
20.
Hansen, J.B., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly , 38, 115-121.
21.
Howell, H., & Bressler, J. ( 1988). Research on teaching styles of teachers of the gifted . Roeper Review, 10, 144-146.
22.
Kagan, D.M. ( 1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers . Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.
23.
Kitano, M., Montgomery, D., VanTassel-Baska, J.L., & Johnsen, S.K. ( 2006). Using the national gifted education standards for preK-12 professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24.
Megay-Nespoli, K. ( 2001). Beliefs and attitudes of novice teachers regarding instruction of academically talented learners. Roeper Review, 23, 178-182.
25.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
26.
Moon, S.M., Feldhusen, J.F., & Dillon, D.R. ( 1994). Long-term effects of an enrichment program based on the Purdue three-stage model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38-48.
27.
Moon, S.M., Kolloff, P., Robinson, A., Dixon, F., & Feldhusen, J.F. (in press). The Purdue three-stage model. In J. S. Renzulli, J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed.) pp. 289-321. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
28.
Moon, S.M., & Rosselli, H.C. (2000). Developing gifted programs . In H. A. Hemilyr, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 499-521). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
29.
Moon, T.R., Callahan, C.M., & Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). The effects of mentoring relationships on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward academically diverse students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 56-62.
30.
Parke, B.N. ( 1989). Educating the gifted and talented: An agenda for the future. Educational Leadership, 46, 4-5.
Reis, S.M., & Westberg, K.L. (1994). The impact of staff development on teachers’ ability to modify curriculum for gifted and talented students . Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 127-135.
33.
Sisk, D. ( 1975). Teaching the gifted and talented teachers: A training model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 81-88.
34.
Starko, A.J., & Schack, G.D. ( 1989). Perceived need, teacher efficacy, and teacher strategies for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 118-122.
35.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
36.
Toll, M.F. ( 2000). The importance of teacher preparation programs to appropriately serve students who are gifted. Understanding Our Gifted, 12, 14-16.
37.
Tomlinson, C.A., Callahan, C.M., Tomchin, E.M., Eiss, N., Imbeau, M., & Landrum, M. ( 1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: addressing academic diversity in contemporary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 269-282.
38.
Tomlinson, C.A., Tomchin, E.M., Callahan, C.M., Adams, C.M., Puzzat-Tinnin, P., Cunningham, C.M., . . . Imbeau, M. ( 1994). Practices of preservice teachers related to gifted and other academically diverse learners. Gifted Child Quarterly , 38, 106-114.
39.
VanTassel-Baska, J. ( 1988). Curriculum planning and development. In J. VanTassel-Baska, J. Feldhusen , K. Seeley, G. Wheatley, L. Silverman, & W. Foster (Eds.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (pp. 23-52). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
VanTassel-Baska, J. ( 2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners: An introduction. In J. VanTassel-Baska & C. A. Little (Eds.), Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners (pp. 1-23). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
41.
Westberg, K.L., Archambault, F.X., Dobyns, S.M., & Salvin, T.J. ( 1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.
42.
Westberg, K.L., & Daoust, M.E. ( 2003). The results of the replication of the classroom practices survey replication in two states. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, Fall, 3-8.
43.
Whitlock, M.S., & DuCette, J.P. ( 1989). Outstanding and average teachers of the gifted: A comparative study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 15-21.
44.
Wood, B., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1996). Creating special interest programs for gifted youth: Purdue’s super Saturday serves as successful model. Gifted Child Today, 19, 22-25, 28-29, 40-42.
