To assess reaction time and attributional complexity as factors contributing to the relatively high moral judgment of gifted youth, a sample of 30 gifted youth and 30 college students responded to a computerized measure of moral judgment development, which also indexed reaction time. Additionally, participants completed a measurement of attributional complexity and reported American College Test (ACT) scores. Statistically significant differences favored the gifted in moral judgment development, reaction time, and attributional complexity. Regression analysis revealed that attributional complexity explained a significant amount of variance, whereas ACT scores and reaction times accounted for minimal variance. Although reaction time did not predict moral judgment developmental difference, discussion is offered to suggest how gifted youth, such as those in this study, might benefit from using their reaction time when considering moral situations.
Putting the Research to Use: The results of this study support the view that complex information processing and reaction time abilities of gifted youth are transferred to their moral judgment development. In sum, in comparison with a control group of college students, the gifted youth considered in this study appeared to process reasons for moral decisions in a more in-depth manner and were able to do so in a more efficient manner. Currently, it is unknown why and how this occurs, whether obstacles exist that could block this process, and whether practices exist that could help to facilitate these areas. Applications of these findings should therefore expound on these issues so that the utility of research on gifted moral judgment ability is increased. Applied research should also focus on transferring this understanding to general populations in the hopes of affecting the understanding of moral judgment development overall.
Beh, H.C., Roberts, R.D., & Prichard-Levy, A. (1994). The relationship between intelligence and choice reaction time within the framework of an extended model of Hick's law: A preliminary report. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 891-897.
2.
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children (E. S. Kit, Trans.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
3.
Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 593-637.
4.
Chovan, W., & Freeman, N.L. (1993). Moral reasoning and personality components in gifted and average students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 1297-1298.
5.
Cohn, S.J., Carlson, J.S., & Jensen, A.R. (1985). Speed of information processing in academically gifted youths. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 621-629.
6.
Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment . New York: Free Press.
7.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
9.
Crowson, H.M., DeBacker, T.K., Derryberry, W.P., & Thoma, S.J. (2005, November). Reliability and the DIT-2: Revisited . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Moral Education, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Deary, I.J. (2000). Simple information processing and intelligence . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267-284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Derryberry, W.P., Jones, K.L., Grieve, F., & Barger, B. (2007). Assessing the relationship among Defining Issues Test Scores and crystallised and fluid intellectual indices. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 475-496.
12.
Derryberry, W.P., & Thoma, S.J. (2005a). Moral judgment, self-understanding, and moral actions: The role of multiple constructs. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 51, 67-92.
13.
Derryberry, W.P., & Thoma, S.J. (2005b). Functional differences: Comparing moral judgment developmental phases of consolidation and transition. Journal of Moral Education, 34, 89-106.
14.
Derryberry, W.P., Thoma, S.J., Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. (2000, August). Verbal ability and the Defining Issues Test: Some recent findings. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
15.
Derryberry, W.P., Wilson, T., Snyder, H., Norman, A., & Barger, B. (2005). Moral judgment differences between gifted youth and college students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education , 17, 6-19.
16.
Dorans, N.J. (1999). Correspondence between ACT and SAT I scores (College Board Research Report No. 99-1, ETS Research Report No. 99-2). New York: The College Board.
17.
Fletcher, G.J.O., Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G.D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875-884.
18.
Follett, K.J., & Hess, T.M. (2002). Aging, cognitive complexity, and the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Gerontology, 57, 312-323.
19.
Foulkes, K.E. (2000). Moral reasoning, self-understanding, and gifted adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
20.
Gibbs, J.C. (1995). The cognitive developmental perspective. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 27-48). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
Hart, D., & Fegley, S. (1995). Prosocial behavior and caring in adolescence: Relations to self-understanding and social judgment. Child Development, 66, 1347-1359.
22.
Howard-Hamilton, M. (1994). An assessment of moral development in gifted adolescents . Roeper Review, 17, 57-59.
Jensen, A.R. (2005). Mental chronometry and the unification of differential psychology. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Pretz (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence: identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 26-50). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Kohlberg, L. (1987). Theoretical introduction to the measurement of moral judgment. In A. Colby & L. Kohlberg (Eds.), The measurement of moral judgment (Vol. 1, pp. 1-61). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Kurtines, W., & Greif, E. (1974). The development of moral thought: Review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 453-470.
27.
Lajoie, S.P., & Shore, B.M. (1986). Intelligence: The speed and accuracy tradeoff in high aptitude individuals. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9, 85-104.
28.
Lohman, D.F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 285-340). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Monroe, K.R., & Epperson, C. (1994). But what else could I do? Choice, identity, and cognitive-perceptual theory. Political Psychology, 15, 201-226.
30.
Narvaez, D. (1993). High achieving students and moral judgment. Journal for the Study of the Gifted, 16, 268-279.
31.
Piaget, J. (1963). Origins of intelligence in children. New York: W. W. Norton.
32.
Rest, J. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
Rest, J., Deemer, D., Barnett, R., Spickemier, J., & Volker, J. (1986). Life experiences and developmental pathways. In J. Rest (Ed.), Moral development: advances in research and theory (pp. 28-58). New York: Praeger.
34.
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M.J., & Thoma, S.J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohbergian approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
35.
Rest, J., Thoma, S.J., Narvaez, D., & Bebeau, M. (1997). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91S, 644-659.
36.
Sanders, C.E., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1995). Does the Defining Issues Test measure psychological phenomena distinct from verbal ability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 498-504.
37.
Snow, R.E., Kyllonen, P.C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 47-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
Steiner, H.H., & Carr, M. (2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 215-228.
39.
Sternberg, R.J. (1982). Reasoning, problem solving, and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 225-307). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Thoma, S.J., Derryberry, W.P., Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. (2000, April). Does the Defining Issues Test measure psychological phenomena distinct from verbal ability? Some relevant data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
41.
Thoma, S.J., Narvaez, D., Endicott, L., & Derryberry, W.P. (2002, April). Developmental phase indicators and moral information processing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, LA.
42.
Thoma, S.J., Narvaez, D., Rest, J., & Derryberry, W.P. (1999). Does moral judgment development reduce to political attitudes or verbal ability? Evidence using the Defining Issues Test. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 325-342.
43.
Thoma, S.J., Rest, J.R., & Davison, M.L. (1991). Describing and testing a moderator of the moral judgment and action relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 659-669.
44.
Tirri, K., & Pehkonen, L. (2002). The moral reasoning and scientific argumentation of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education , 13, 120-129.
45.
Walker, L.J. (1980). Cognitive and perspective-taking prerequisites for moral development. Child Development, 51, 131-139.
46.
Walker, L.J. (2002). The model and the measure: An appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 353-367.
47.
Yun, M., Shi, J., Tang, H., & Liu, Z. (2004). A comparative study on the development of speed of information processing (SIP) of 8- to 12-year old supernormal and normal children. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5, 233-248.
