There is no clear-cut evidence whether fiscal incentives turn into desired growth of the economy or just result in cost for the exchequer. Looking at the success of China and other countries, India has tried to replicate the ‘zone’ concept by enacting special economic zones (SEZs) policy in 2005. The present article attempts to study different types of fiscal incentives given to the firms in SEZs and their impact on the performance through survey-cum-interview method. The research reveals that there is a need to modify the structure of present incentives to tap its full benefit.
AggarwalA. (2010). Economic impacts of SEZs: Theoretical approaches and analysis of newly notified SEZs in India. Retrieved 11 September 2011 from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20902/
2.
CieslikA.RyanM. (2005). Location determinants of Japanese multinationals in Poland: Do special economic zones really matter for investment decisions?Journal of Economic Integration, 20(3), 475–496.
3.
DhavanA. (2011). Special economic zones and Indian perspective. International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research, 2(1), 95–105.
4.
DhingraT.SinghT.SinhaA. (2009). Location strategy for competitiveness of special economic zones: A generic framework for India. An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 19(4), 272–289.
5.
DowlaA. (1997). Export processing zones in Bangladesh: The economic impact. Asian Survey, 37(6), 561–574.
6.
DuttaM. (2009). Nokia SEZ: Public price of success. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(40), 23–25.
7.
GomesJ. (2001). SMEs and industrial clusters: Lessons for India from Italian experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(49), 4532–4533.
8.
IkeyiN. (1998). The export processing zones and foreign investment promotion in Nigeria: A note on recent legislation. Journal of African Law, 42(2), 223–230.
KuznetsovA. (1993–1994). Promotion of foreign investment in Russia: An evaluation of free economic zones as a policy instrument. Russian and East European Finance and Trade, 29(4), 43–65.
MurayamaM.YokotaN. (2009). Revisiting labor and gender issues in export processing zones: Case of South Korea, Bangladesh and India. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 73–83.
13.
PalitA. (2009). Special economic zones in India: New challenges for governance and public policy. ISAS Working Paper No.82, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore.
14.
RautR.K. (2010). SEZ and Indian Economy. International Research Journal, 1(13), 77–78.
15.
RondinelliA.D.BurpittJ.W. (2000). Do government incentives attract and retain international investment? A study of foreign owned firms in North Carolina. Policy Sciences, 33(2), 181–205.
16.
RayA. (2002, September14–20). Chinese economic miracle: Lessons to be learnt. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(37), 3835–3848.
17.
SampatP. (2008). Special economic zones in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(28), 25–27.
18.
ShahU.K.RiveraE.J. (2007). Export processing zones and corporate environmental performance in emerging economics: The case of the oil, gas and chemical sectors of Trinidad and Tobago. Policy Sciences, 40(4), 265–285.
19.
SharmaN.K. (2009). Special economic zones: Socio economic implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(20), 18–21.
20.
SilvermanH.R. (1982). Enterprise zones and fundamental issues. The Urban Lawyer, 14(4), 751–759.
21.
YuanJ.D.EdenL. (1992). Export processing zones in Asia: A comparative study. Asian Survey, 32(11), 1026–1045.
