Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

How important are market potential and fiscal incentives for firms’ location decisions? We estimate the influence of subsidies and tax breaks on the decisions of firms to relocate or to remain in a certain U.S. county using a structural economic geography model developed in Meurers and Moenius (2018). In a panel data set from 1990 to 2016 for almost 3,000 U.S. counties, the authors find a strong and robust impact of economic geography on firms’ location decisions: The closer a county is to market demand and to the supply of inputs, the more firms locate there. As the model predicts, public investment attracts firms while the local tax burden disincentivizes economic activity, although to a lesser extent. Furthermore, in counties that are closer to economic centers, firms respond less to public investment and tax changes than firms in counties far away from centers. These data, therefore, confirm the predictions of the model regarding the potential effectiveness of regional development policies, in particular for investment tax credits, job creation, and training.

Keywords

regional economic policy fiscal incentives market potential

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. E.

van Wincoop

(2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 691-751. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10480

Bartik

T. J.

(1991). Who benefits from State and Local economic development policies? Upjohn Press.

Bartik

T. J.

(2017). A new panel database on business incentives for economic development offered by State and Local governments in the United States. Upjohn Press.

Brülhart

(1998). Economic geography, industry location and trade: The evidence. World Economy, 21(6), 775-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00163

Chirinko

R. S.

Wilson

D. J.

(2008). State investment tax incentives: A zero-sum game? Journal of Public Economics, 92(12), 2362-2384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.005

Crozet

Mayer

Mucchielli

J.-L.

(2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00010-3

Ellison

Glaeser

E. L.

(1999). The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review, 89(2), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.311

Ellison

Glaeser

E. L.

Kerr

W. R.

(2010). What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review, 100(3), 1195-1213. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1195

Fujita

Krugman

Venables

A. J.

(2001). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade (Vol. 1). MIT Press.

10.

Harris

C. D.

(1954). The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44(4), 315-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2561395

11.

Head

Mayer

(2000). Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Review of World Economics, 136(2), 284-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707689

12.

Head

Mayer

(2004). Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 959-972. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125257

13.

Helms

L. J.

(1985). The effect of state and local taxes on economic growth: A time series-cross section approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4), 574-582. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924801

14.

Henly

S. E.

Sanchez

J. M.

(2009). The U.S. establishment size distribution: Secular changes and sectoral decomposition. Economic Quarterly, 95(4), 419-454. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2188482

15.

Holmes

T. J.

(1998). The effect of state policies on the location of manufacturing: Evidence from state borders. Journal of Political Economy, 106(4), 667-705. https://doi.org/10.1086/250026

16.

Hummels

(1999). Towards a geography of trade costs. https://www.krannert.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research/toward/tgtc.pdf

17.

Krugman

(1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763

18.

Marshall

(1890). The principles of economics. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.

19.

McFadden

(1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In Zarembka

(Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). Academic Press.

20.

Melitz

M. J.

(2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8881

21.

Meurers

Moenius

. (2018). Optimal public investment in economic centers and the periphery. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3198783

22.

Peltzman

(2016). State and local fiscal policy and growth at the border. Journal of Urban Economics, 95(September), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.06.003

23.

Randall

Gordon

Greene

Huffer

(2018). Follow the money: How to track federal funding to local governments. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/96761/2018.02.26_follow_the_money_v4_-_printpdf.pdf

24.

Redding

(2016). Goods trade, factor mobility and welfare. Journal of International Economics, 101(July), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.04.003

25.

Redding

Venables

A. J.

(2004). Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 53-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001

26.

Rickman

D. S.

Wang

(2018). U.S. State and local fiscal policy and economic activity: Do we know more now? https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88422/1/MPRA_paper_88422.pdf

27.

Simonovska

Waugh

M. E.

(2014). The elasticity of trade: Estimates and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 92(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.10.001

28.

Rickman

D. S.

(2013). US state and local fiscal policies and non-metropolitan area economic performance: A spatial equilibrium analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 92(3), 579-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00423.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB

Market Potential and Fiscal Incentives Influence Firms’ Location Decisions: Evidence From U.S. Counties

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material