This article simulates job and fiscal impacts of the Michigan Economic Growth Authority’s tax credit program for job creation, commonly called “MEGA.” Under plausible assumptions about how such credits affect business location decisions, the net costs per job created of the MEGA program are simulated to be of modest size. The job creation impacts of MEGA are simulated to be considerably larger than devoting similar dollar resources to general business tax cuts. The simulation methodology developed here is applicable to incentives in other states.
BartikT. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
2.
BartikT. J. (1992). The effects of state and local taxes on economic development: A review of recent research. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 102-111.
3.
BartikT. J. (2001). Jobs for the poor: Can labor demand policies help?New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
4.
BartikT. J. (2005). Solving the problems of economic development incentives. Growth and Change, 36, 139-166.
5.
BruceD.FoxW. F.TuttleM. H. (2006). Tax base elasticities: A multi-state analysis of long-run and short-run dynamics. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 315-341.
6.
BussT. F. (2001). The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 90-105.
7.
BussoM.GregoryJ.KlineP. M. (2010). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place based policy (Working Paper No. 16096). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
ByrneP. F. (2010). Does tax increment financing deliver on its promise of jobs? The impact of tax increment financing on municipal employment growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 13-22.
9.
CalcagnoP. T.ThompsonH. (2004). State economic incentives: Stimulus or reallocation?Public Finance Review, 35(5), 1-15.
10.
ChirinkoR. S.WilsonD. J. (2010a). Job creation tax credits and job growth: Whether, when, and where? (Working Paper No. 2010-25). San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
DyeR. F.MerrimanD. F. (1999). The effects of tax increment financing on economic development (Working Paper No. 75). Chicago: Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois.
13.
EdmistonK. D. (2004). The net effects of large plant locations and expansions on county employment. Journal of Regional Science, 44, 289-319.
14.
ElveryJ. A. (2009). The impact of enterprise zones on resident employment: An evaluation of the enterprise zone programs of California and Florida. Economic Development Quarterly, 23, 44-59.
15.
FanW.TreyzF.TreyzG. (2000). An evolutionary new economic geography model. Journal of Regional Science, 40, 671-695.
16.
FaulkD. (2002). Do state economic development incentives create jobs? An analysis of state employment tax credits. National Tax Journal, 55, 263-280.
17.
FoxW. F.MurrayM. N. (2004). Do economic effects justify the use of fiscal incentives?Southern Economic Journal, 71, 78-92.
18.
GabeT. M.KraybillD. S. (2002). The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments. Journal of Regional Science, 42, 703-730.
19.
GreenbaumR. T.LandersJ. (2009). Why are state policy makers still proponents of enterprise zones? What explains their action in the face of a preponderance of the research?International Regional Science Review, 32, 466-479.
20.
GreenstoneM.MorettiE. (2004). Bidding for industrial plants: Does winning a ‘million dollar plant’ increase welfare? (Working Paper No. 9844). Berkeley: University of California.
21.
GreenwoodM. J.HuntG. L.RickmanD. S.TreyzG. I. (1991). Migration, regional equilibrium, and the estimation of compensating differentials. American Economic Review, 81, 1382-1390.
22.
HansenR. J.KalambokidisL. (2010). How are businesses responding to Minnesota’s tax-free zone program?Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 180-192.
HicksM. J.LaFaiveM. (2011). The influence of targeted economic development tax incentives on county economic growth: Evidence from Michigan’s MEGA credits. Economic Development Quarterly, 25, 193-205.
25.
HinesJ. R.Jr. (1996). Altered states: Taxes and the location of foreign direct investment in America. American Economic Review, 86, 1076-1094.
26.
HollenbeckK. (2008). Is there a role for public support of incumbent worker on-the-job training? (Upjohn Institute Working Paper No. 08-138). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
27.
HolzerH. J.BlockR. N.CheathamM.KnottJ. H. (1993). Are training subsidies for firms effective? The Michigan experience. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 625-636.
28.
HoytW. H.JepsenC.TroskeK. R. (2008). Business incentives and employment: What incentives work and where? (Working Paper No. 2009-02). Lexington: University of Kentucky.
29.
JarminR. (1998). Manufacturing extension and productivity dynamics (Discussion Paper No. 98-8). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
30.
JarminR. (1999). Evaluating the impact of manufacturing extension on productivity growth. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 99-119.
31.
LeeY. (2008). Geographic redistribution of U.S. manufacturing and the role of state development policy. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 436-450.
32.
LeRoyG. (2007). Concrete ways to curtail the economic war among the states. In MarkusenA. (Ed.), Reining in the competition for capital (pp. 183-198). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
33.
LugerM. I.BaeS. (2005). The effectiveness of state business tax incentive programs: The case of North Carolina. Economic Development Quarterly, 19, 327-345.
Manufacturing Extension Partnership. (2010). Delivering measurable results to its clients: Fiscal year 2008 results. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.
36.
MasonS.ThomasK. P. (2010). Tax increment financing in Missouri: An analysis of determinants, competitive dynamics, equity, and path dependency. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 169-179.
MerrimanD.SkidmoreM.KashianR. (2011). Do tax increment finance districts stimulate growth in real estate values?Real Estate Economics, 39, 221-250.
39.
NeumarkD.KolkoJ. (2010). Do enterprise zones create jobs? Evidence from California’s enterprise zone program. Journal of Urban Economics, 68, 1-19.
40.
PapkeL. E. (1994). Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 37-49.
41.
PetersA. H.FisherP. S. (2002). State enterprise zone programs: Have they worked?Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
42.
PetersA. H.FisherP. S. (2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 27-38.
43.
PhillipsJ. M.GossE. P. (1995). The effect of state and local taxes on economic development: A meta-analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 62, 320-333.
44.
PoterbaJ.SummersL. (1995). A CEO survey of U.S. companies’ time horizons and hurdle rates. Sloan Management Review, 37(1), 43-53.
45.
RickmanD. S.TreyzG. I. (1993). Alternative labor market closures in a regional model. Growth and Change, 24, 32-50.
46.
ThomasK. P. (2000). Competing for capital: Europe and North America in a global era. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
47.
TreyzG. I. (1993). Regional economic modeling: A systematic approach to economic forecasting and policy analysis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48.
TreyzG. I.RickmanD. S.ShaoG. (1991). The REMI economic-demographic forecasting and simulation model. International Regional Science Review, 14, 221-253.
49.
TreyzG. I.TreyzF. (2004). The evaluation of programs aimed at local and regional development: Methodology and twenty years of experience using REMI policy insight. In NolanA.WongG. (Eds.), Evaluating local economic and employment development: How to assess what works among programmes and policies (pp. 151-190). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
50.
WasylenkoM. P. (1997, March). Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature. New England Economic Review, 1997, 37-52.
