The need for effective transition practices, in the form of planning, direct service, and linkages to post-school settings, is well documented in special education literature. This study examined transition-related practices in use in one school and their effects on student experiences. Data were collected via qualitative methodology in a secondary program for students with learning disabilities. Findings showed the utilization of some literature-identified best practices. Participants indicated that vocation-related activities (e.g., work experience) were well received Instruction in self-determination skills was observed to be an integral, yet undocumented part of the program. Results also suggested that specific planning activities (i.e., transition teams) were responsible for much of the program's success.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanP. B., & VogelS. A. (1990). College graduates with learning disabilities—employment attainment and career patterns.Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 154–166.
2.
BlalockG. (1996). Community transition teams as the foundation for transition services for youth with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 148–159.
3.
BogdanR. C., & BildenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.*
4.
BrolinD. E. (1991). Life centered career education: A competency based approach (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 311 666)
5.
Collet-KlingenbergL. (1998). Communication as a critical factor in effective transition programming.University of Wisconsin, Madison. Manuscript in preparation.
6.
D'AmicoR. (1991). The working world awaits: Employment experience during and shortly after secondary school. In WagnerM., NewmanL., D'AmicoR., JayE. D., Butler-NalinP., MarderC., & CoxR. (Eds.), Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report for the National Longitudinal Transition Study of special education students (pp. 8-1–8-55). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.*
7.
DenzinN. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
8.
DunnC. (1996). A status report on transition planning for individuals with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 17–30.
9.
EdgarE. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?Exceptional Children, 53, 555–561.
10.
FairweatherJ. S., & ShaverD. M. (1991). Making the transition to postsecondary education and training.Exceptional Children, 57, 264–270.
11.
FowlerF. J. (1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
12.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York: Aldine.*
13.
HalpernA. (1990). A methodological review of follow-up and follow-along studies tracking school leavers in special education.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 13(1), 13–27.
14.
HaringK. A., LovettD. L., & SmithD. D. (1990). A follow-up study of recent special education graduates of learning disabilities programs.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 108–113.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. 20 U.S.C., 1412. (Formerly titled the Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1990 [P.L. 101–476]).
16.
KohlerP. D. (1993). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied?Career Development for Exceptional Individual16, 107–121.
17.
MalcolmC. B., PolatajkoH. J., & SimonsJ. (1990). A descriptive study of adults with suspected learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 518–520.
18.
MarshallC. (1985). Appropriate criteria of trustworthiness and goodness for qualitative research on education organizations.Quality and Quantity, 19, 353–373.
19.
MarshallC., & RossmanG. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
20.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
21.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
22.
RichardsonL. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
23.
RuschF. R., EnchelmaierJ. F., & KohlerP. D. (1994). Employment outcomes and activities for youth in transition.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(1), 1–16.
24.
ShapiroE. S., & LentzF. E.Jr. (1991). Vocational-technical programs: Follow-up of students with learning disabilities.Exceptional Children, 58, 47–60.
25.
SitlingtonP., FrankA., & CarsonR. (1993). Adult adjustment among graduates with mild disabilities.Exceptional Children, 59, 221–233.
26.
StainbackW., & StainbackS. (1989). Using qualitative data collection procedures to investigate supported education issues.The Journal for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 271–277.
27.
StowitschekJ. J. (1992). Policy and planning in transition programs at the state agency level. In RuschF., DeStefanoL., Chadsey-RuschJ., PhelpsL. A., & SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 519–536). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.*
28.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
29.
U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
30.
WagnerM. (1993). Trends in postsecondary youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of special education students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Transition Research Institute at Illinois Project Director's Eighth Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.
31.
WehmanP. (1990). School-to-work: Elements of successful programs.TEACHING Exceptional Children, 23(1), 40–43.
32.
WehmanP., KregelJ., & BarcusJ. M. (1985). From school to work: A vocational transition model for handicapped students.Exceptional Children, 52, 25–37.
33.
YsseldykeJ. E., ThurlowM. L., & GilmanR. (1993). Educational outcomes and indicators for students completing school. Available from: NCEO, 350 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
