BosC. & FilipD. (1984). Comprehension monitoring in learning disabled and average students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 229–233.
2.
BransfordJ. D.SherwoodR. D.HasselbringT. S.KinzerC. K., & WilliamsS. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In NixD. & SpiroR. (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA., & DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research. 32–54.
4.
Cognition and Technology Croup at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher. 19, 2–10.
5.
GildeaP. M.MillerG. A., & WurtenbergC. L. (1990). Contextual enrichment by videodisc. In NixD. & SpiroR. (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
KameenuiE. J.SimmonsD. C. & DarchC. B. (1987). LD children's comprehension of selected textual features: Effects of proximity of information. Learning Disability Quarterly. 10, 237–248.
7.
JenkinsJ. R., & DixonR. C. (1983). Vocabulary learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 237–260.
8.
JohnsonR. T. (1988). Story retelling: Innovation in a learning technology context. Early Child Development and Care, 32, 53–58.
MooreP. R.RiethH., & EbelingM. (1993). Considerations in teaching higher order thinking skills to students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 25, 1–12.
11.
TorgesenJ. K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. Topics in Learning and Learning Disability. (1). 45–52.
12.
XinF. (1993). The effects of video-based macro-contexts in vocabulary learning and reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
