Leading scholars in special education acknowledge that the field has recently come under intense public criticism. Various defenses have been offered, including the lack of appropriate conditions under which to implement the knowledge base of special education. The nature of this knowledge base is examined, in particular the claim that special education possesses scientifically derived technologies. Specifically, a case is made that the term “science” is misused, and that the methods of empiricist science are inappropriately applied to study of special education. It is concluded that many, if not most, of the criticisms leveled at special education can be traced back to this misunderstanding of science. As a result, the field would do well to reconsider its philosophical ancestry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArtilesA. J.TrentS. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 410–437.
2.
AryD.JacobsL.RazaviehA. (1996). Introduction to research in education. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.*
3.
BernsteinR. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.*
4.
BorgW. R.GallM. D. (1979). Educational research (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.*
5.
CarnineD. (1987). A response to: False standards, a distorting and disintegrating effect on education, turning away from useful purposes, being inevitably unfulfilled, and remaining unrealistic and irrelevant. Remedial and Special Education, 8(1), 42–23.
6.
CarnineD. (1993, December 8). Facts over fads: Testing out “innovations” might save money, time, and good will. Education Week, p. 40.
7.
CarrierJ. G. (1986). Learning disability: Social class and the construction of inequality in American education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.*
8.
ColesG. S. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at “learning disabilities.”New York: Pantheon.*
9.
CzikoG. A. (1992). Purposeful behavior as the control of perception: Implications for educational research. Educational Researcher, 21(9), 10–18.
10.
DillonS. (1994, April 7). A class apart: Special education soaks up New York's school resources. The New York Times, p. A16.
11.
DonmoyerR. (1995, April). The very idea of a knowledge base. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
12.
EisnerE. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.*
13.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1995a). Special education can work. In KauffmanJ. M.LloydJ. W.HallahanD. P.AstutoT. A. (Eds.), Issues in the educational placement of pupils with emotional or behavioral disorders (pp. 363–377). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.*
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1995b). What's “special” about special education?Phi Delta Kappan, 76(7), 522–530.
15.
GadamerH. G. (1975). Truth and method (BardenG.CummingJ., Eds. and Trans.). New York: Seabury Press. (Original work published in 1960)*
16.
GiddensA. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies. New York: Basic Books.*
17.
GiddensA. (1977). Studies in social and political theory. New York: Basic Books.*
18.
HazelriggL. (1989). Claims of knowledge. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press.*
19.
HeshusiusL. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 403–415.
20.
HesseM. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.*
21.
IanoR. P. (1986). The study and development of teaching: With implication for the advancement of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 50–61.
22.
KaestleC. F. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23–31.
23.
KauffmanJ. M. (1994). Places of change: Special education's power and identity in an era of educational reform. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 610–618.
24.
KavaleK. (1990). The effectiveness of special education. In GutkinT. B.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 868–898). New York: Wiley.*
25.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.*
26.
KlattH. J. (1991). Learning disabilities: A question-able construct. Educational Theory, 41, 47–60.
27.
LakatosI. (1972). Falsification and methodology of scientific research programs. In LakatosI.MusgraveA. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.*
28.
LloydJ. W. (1987). The art and science of research on teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 8(1), 44–46.
29.
MacIntyreA. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.*
30.
PopkewitzT. S. (1992). Cartesian anxiety, linguistic communism, and reading texts. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 11–15.
31.
PoplinM. S. (1987). Self-imposed blindness: The scientific method in education. Remedial and Special Education, 8(6), 31–37.
32.
PoplinM. S. (1988). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
33.
PutnamH. (1981). Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.*
34.
RavetzJ. R. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. London: Oxford University Press.*
35.
RedlF. (1966). When we deal with children: Selected writings. New York: Free Press.*
36.
RortyR. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.*
37.
SchwandtT. (1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 18, 11–16.
38.
ShapiroJ. P.LoebP.BowermasterD.WrightA.HeaddenS.TochT. (1993, December 13). Separate and unequal: How special education programs are cheating our children and costing taxpayers billions each year. U. S. News & World Report pp. 46–54.
39.
ShawS. F.CullenJ. P.McGuireJ. M.BrinckerhoffL. C. (1995). Operationalizing a definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 586–597.
40.
SkrticT. M. (1986). The crisis in special education knowledge: A perspective on perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 18(7), 1–16.
41.
SkrticT. M. (1991). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver, CO: Love.*
42.
SkrticT. M. (1995). The special education knowledge tradition: Crisis and opportunity. In MeyenE. L.SkrticT. M. (Eds.), Special education and student disability: Traditional, emerging, and alternative perspectives (pp. 609–672). Denver, CO: Love.*
43.
SmithJ. K. (1989). The nature of social and educational inquiry: Empiricism versus Interpretation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.*
44.
SmithJ. K. (1993). After the demise of empiricism: The problem of judging social and educational inquiry. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.*
45.
Special Ed's special costs. (1993, October 20). Wall Street Journal, p. A14.
46.
SwansonH. L. (Ed.). (1991). Operational definitions and learning disabilities [Special issue]. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(4).
47.
TaylorC. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3–51.
48.
ThorndikeE. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 5–12.
49.
UlmanJ. D.RosenbergM. S. (1986). Science and superstition in special education. Exceptional Children, 52, 459–460.
50.
ZigmondN.JenkinsJ.FuchsL. S.DenoS.FuchsD.BakerJ. N.JenkinsL.CouthinoM. (1995). Special education in restructured schools: Findings from three multi-year studies. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(7), 531–540.
