This study was designed to determine (a) the demographic characteristics and responsibilities of educational sign language interpreters within the K-12 public school system in the United States; (b) the mode of communication they use most frequently; and (c) their education and certification levels. Surveys were completed by 222 educational sign language interpreters in three states. Results showed the lack of certification and adequate training for the majority of respondents, as well as inadequate minority/gender representation, among other concerns. The study raised questions about the dependence of students who are deaf or hard of hearing on the educational interpreter support system. Recommendations for educational practice are presented.
AndersonG. B.StaufferL. K. (1990). Identifying standards for the training of interpreters for deaf people. Little Rock: University of Arkansas Research and Training Center on Deafness and Hearing Impairment.
3.
BabbidgeH. D. (1965). Education of the deaf in the United States: A report to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare by his Advisory Committee of Education of the Deaf. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 014 188).
4.
BornsteinH.SaulnierK. (1984). The signed English starter: A beginning book in the signed English system. Washington, DC: Kendall Green Publications.
5.
BrazeauK. (Ed.). (1991, Spring). Oregon guidelines: Educational interpreting for students who are deaf. Salem: Publications and Multimedia Center, Oregon Department of Education.
6.
Colorado Department of Education (CDE). (1991). Educational interpreter guidelines. Denver: CDE, Special Education Services Unit.
7.
Commission on Education of the Deaf (COED). (1988, February). Toward equality: Education of the deaf. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8.
ContrucciV. J. (1991). Educational interpreter license. Exceptional education/pupil services: Information update. (Bulletin No. 91.13). Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
9.
DillmanD. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. New York: Wiley.
10.
EpeeC. M. (1801). The method of educating the deaf and dumb: Confirmed by long experience (translated from the French and Latin). London, UK: T. Cadell, Robson, Harding & Longman/Rees.
11.
FrishbergN. (1990). Interpreting: An introduction (rev. ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf.
12.
GustasonG. (1985). Interpreters entering public school employment. American Annals of the Deaf130, 265–266.
13.
GustasonG.PfetzingD.ZawolkowE. (1980). Signing exact English. Los Alamitos, CA: Modern Signs Press.
14.
GustasonG.ZawolkowE. (1993). Signing exact English. Los Alamitos, CA: Modern Signs Press.
15.
HarrisW. L. (1989). Duties of the educational interpreter in Iowa. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.
16.
HayesP. L. (1991). Educational interpreters for deaf students: Their responsibilities, problems, and concerns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
17.
HayesP. L. (1992). Educational interpreters for deaf students: Their responsibilities, problems, and concerns. Journal of Interpretation, 5(1), 5–24.
18.
HeavnerJ. (1986). Interpreting in the educational setting. (Technical Assistance Paper No. 12). Tallahassee: Florida Bureau of Education for Exceptional Students, Division of Public Schools.
19.
HurwitzT. A. (1991). Report from National Task Force on Educational Interpreting. Conference proceedings: Educational interpreting: Into the 1990s, November 9–11, 1989. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, College of Continuing Education.
20.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990 (IDEA). Public Law 101-476. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
JohnsonK. (1991). Miscommunication in interpreted classroom interaction. Sign Language Studies, 70, 1–34.
22.
KluwinT. N. (1994). Interpreting services for youngsters who are deaf in local public school programs. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 28(2), 21–29.
23.
Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (MCDHH) & Massachusetts Department of Education, Division of Special Education. (1988, December 5). An information guide related to standards for educational interpreting for deaf and severely hard of hearing students in elementary and secondary schools. Boston: MCDHH.
24.
New York State Department of Education (NYSDE). (1994). Guidelines for educational interpreters. Albany: Author.
25.
RosenR. (1992). Testimony: Education of the Deaf Act reauthorization. House Subcommittee Hearing, February 25, 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
SalendS. J.LongoM. (1994). The roles of the educational interpreter in mainstreaming. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 26(4), 22–28.
27.
SandersonG. (1991). Setting priorities for the 1990s. Conference proceedings: Educational interpreting: Into the 1990s, November 9–11, 1989. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, College of Continuing Education.
28.
SandersonG.GustasonG. (Eds.) (1993). Model standards for the certification of educational interpreters for deaf students and suggested options for routes to certification. Silver Spring, MD, & Washington, DC: Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf/Council on Education of the Deaf.
29.
ScheinJ. D.MalloryB. L.GreavesS. (1991). Communication for deaf students in mainstream classrooms. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
30.
SchildrothA. N.HottoS. A. (1994). Inclusion or exclusion? Deaf students and the inclusion movement. American Annals of the Deaf139(2), 239–243.
31.
SchragJ. (1991). Special education in the 1990s, keynote address. Conference proceedings: Educational interpreting: Into the 1990s, November 9–11, 1989. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, College of Continuing Education.
32.
SeleskovitchD. (1978). Interpreting for international conferences. Washington, DC: Pen and Booth.
33.
StedtJ. D.MooresD. F. (1990). Manual codes of English and American Sign Language. In BornsteinH. (Ed.), Manual communication: Implications for education (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
34.
StewartD. A. (1988). Educational interpreting for the hearing impaired. British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 12(3), 273–279.
35.
StrongM.RudserS. Fritsch (1985). An assessment instrument for sign language interpreters. Sign Language Studies, 49, 343–362.
36.
StrongM.RudserS. Fritsch (1986). The subjective assessment of sign language interpreters. Sign Language Studies, 53, 299–314.
37.
StucklessE. R.AveryJ. C.HurwitzT. A. (1989). Educational interpreting for deaf students: Report of the National Task Force on Educational Interpreting. Rochester, NY: National Technical Institute for the Deaf at Rochester Institute of Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 331 274).
38.
TogiokaP. (1990). Looking at educational interpreting theory: Course content and rationale used in a training program for educational interpreters. In SwabyL. (Ed.), The challenge of the 90's: New standards in interpreter education. Conference of Interpreter Trainers 8th National Convention, Pomona, California.
39.
WangM. C.ReynoldsM. C.WalbergH. J. (Eds.) (1990). Special education: Research and practice: Synthesis and findings. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
40.
WendelT. (Ed.). (1993). Guidelines for sign language interpreters. Lincoln: Nebraska Department of Education/Nebraska Commission for the Hearing Impaired.
41.
WilliamsK.SchickB. (1992). Educational interpreter performance assessment. Proceedings of the seventh annual conference on issues in language and deafness, October 1992. Omaha, NE: Boys Town.
42.
WinstonE. A. (1985). Mainstreaming: Like it or not. Journal of Interpretation, 2, 117–119.
43.
WinstonE. A. (1988). Mainstream interpreting: An analysis of the task. Unpublished master's thesis, Gallaudet University.
44.
WinstonE. A. (1989). Transliteration: What's the message. In LucasC. (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of the deaf community (pp. 147–164). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
WinstonE. A. (1990). Mainstream interpreting: An analysis of the task. In SwabyL. (Ed.), The challenge of the 90's: New standards in interpreter education. Conference of Interpreter Trainers 8th National Convention. Pomona, CA.
46.
Witter-MerithewA.DirstR. (1982). Preparation and use of educational interpreters. In SimsD. G.WalkerG. G.WhiteheadR. L. (Eds.), Deafness and Communication, pp. 395–406. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
