This study evaluated the effects of social interaction training on the social interactions directed by high school students without disabilities toward peers with severe disabilities. Eight high school students who were peer tutors in a classroom for students with severe disabilities were matched in pairs and then randomly assigned to interact with and serve as partners for four classmates with severe disabilities. Only one participant in each peer tutor pair received the social interaction training. A statistical analysis indicated that the training increased the frequency of initiations of interactions directed from the students without disabilities toward their partners with severe disabilities. There was also an increase in the proportion of interactions that were social in nature, with a resulting decrease in the frequency of task-related interactions, as well as a significant increase in targeted social behaviors of the participants with severe disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshmoreR. D. (1975). Background considerations in developing strategies for changing attitudes and behavior toward the mentally retarded. In BegaM. & RichardsonS. (Eds.), The mentally retarded and society: A social science perspective (pp. 159–174). Baltimore: University Press.
2.
BiklenD.CorriganC., & QuickD. (1989). Beyond obligation: Students' relations with each other in integrated classes. In LipskyD. & GartnerA. (Eds.), Beyond separate education: Quality education for all (pp. 207–221). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
BrinkerR. P., & ThorpeM. E. (1986). Features of integrated educational ecologies that predict social behavior among severely mentally retarded and non-retarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 150–159.
4.
CarrE. G. (1985). Behavioral approaches to language and communication. In SchloplerE. & MesibovG. B. (Eds.), Communication problems in autism (pp. 1–33). New York: Plenum.
5.
CarrE. G. & DurandV. M. (1985). The social-communicative basis of severe behavior problems in children. In ReissS. & BoctzinR. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 214–254). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Chadsey-RuschJ. (1990). Social interactions of secondary-aged students with severe handicaps: Implications for facilitating the transition from school to work. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 69–78.
7.
Chadsey-RuschJ., & GonzalezP. (1988). Social ecology of the workplace: Employers' perceptions versus direct observation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 9, 229–245.
DonaldsonJ. (1980). Changing attitudes toward handicapped persons: A review and analysis of research. Exceptional Children, 46, 504–515.
10.
DonnellanA. M.La VignaG. W.Negri-ShoultzN., & FassbenderL. L. (1988). Progress without punishment. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
DonnellanA. M.MirendaP. L.MesarosR. A., & FassbenderL. L. (1984). Analyzing the communicative functions of aberrant behavior. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 201–212.
12.
EdgingtonE. S. (1967). Statistical inference from N = 1 experiments. The Journal of Psychology, 65, 195–199.
13.
EdgingtonE. S. (1975). Randomization tests for one-subject operant experiments. The Journal of Psychology, 90, 57–60.
14.
EdgingtonE. S. (1980a). Random assignment and statistical tests for one-subject experiments. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 19–28.
15.
EdgingtonE. S. (1980b). Validity of randomization tests for one-subject experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5(3), 235–251.
16.
EdgingtonE. S. (1980c). Overcoming obstacles to single-subject experimentation. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5(3), 261–267.
17.
EichingerJ. (1990). Goal structure effects on social interaction: Nondisabled and disabled elementary students. Exceptional Children, 56, 408–416.
18.
ForestM., & LusthausE. (1989). Promoting educational equality for all students: Circles and maps. In StainbackS.StainbackW., & ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 43–57). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
Gaylord-RossR. J., & HaringT. G. (1987). Social interaction research for adolescents with severe handicaps. Behavioral Disorders, 12(4), 264–275.
20.
Gaylord-RossR. J.HaringT. G.BreenC., & Pitts-ConwayV. (1984). The training and generalization of social interaction skills with autistic youth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 209–214.
21.
GoldsteinH., & WickstromS. (1986). Peer intervention effects on communicative interaction among handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 209–214.
22.
GottliebJ. (1980). Improving attitudes toward retarded children by using group discussion. Exceptional Children, 47, 106–113.
23.
HalleJ. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 2, 29–37.
24.
HalleJ. W. (1987). Teaching language in the natural environment: An analysis of spontaneity. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 28–37.
25.
HalvorsenA., & SailorW. (1990). Integration of students with severe and profound disabilities: A review of research. In Gaylord-RossR. (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 111–172). New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
HaringT. G.RogerC.LeeM.BreenC., & Gaylord-RossR. J. (1986). Teaching social language to moderately handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 159–171.
27.
HuntP.AlwellM.GoetzL., & SailorW. (1990). Generalized effects of conversation skill training. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(4), 240–260.
28.
LevinJ. R.MarascuiloL. A., & HubertL. J. (1978). N = nonparametric randomization tests. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 55–56). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Lignugaris/KraftB.RuleS.SalzbergC. L., & StowitscheckJ. J. (1986). Social inter-personal skills of handicapped and nonhandicapped adults at Work. Journal of Employment Counseling, 23, 20–30.
30.
MarascuiloL. A., & BuskP. (1988). Combining statistics for multiple baseline AB and replicated ABAB designs across subjects. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 1–28.
31.
MurrayC., & BecksteadS. (1983). Awareness and inservice manual (AIM). San Francisco: San Francisco State University, San Francisco Unified School District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242182).
32.
Murray-SeegertC. (1989). Nasty girls, thugs, and humans like us: Social relations between severely disabled and nondisabled students in high school. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
33.
OgbuJ. (1978). School desegregation in racially stratified communities: A problem of congruence. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 9(4), 290–292.
34.
PeckC. A.DonaldsonJ., & PezzoliM. (1990). Some benefits nonhandicapped adolescents perceive for themselves from their social relationships with peers who have severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 241–249.
35.
PumpianI. R. (1981). Variables effecting attitudes toward the employability of severely handicapped adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison.
36.
SchellenbergJ. A. (1970). An introduction to social psychology. New York: Random House.
37.
SchulerA. L., & GoetzL. (1981). Assessment of severe language disabilities: Communication and cognitive considerations. Analysis and Intervention of Developmental Disabilities, 1, 333–346.
38.
StrainP., & OdomS. (1986). Peer social initiations: Effective intervention for social skills development of exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 52, 543–551.
39.
TawneyJ. W. & GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
40.
VoeltzL. M. (1980). Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84(3), 455–464.
