Teacher ratings from four consecutive cohorts of kindergarten students were used to establish a prediction function by which children who ultimately received special education services in the form of resource-class placement were discriminated from children who remained solely in regular education classrooms. All five factors measured by the RISK scale were significantly related to future school performance, but items that assessed child ability, current performance, and teacher investment were most predictive of eventual special-class placement. Overall accuracy for the screening measure was 94.13%, with 1,194 out of 1,269 children accurately selected to their appropriate educational placement.
ButlerS. R.MarshH. W.SheppardM. J., & SheppardJ. L. (1985). Seven-year longitudinal study of the prediction of reading achievement. Journal of Education Psychology, 77(3), 349–361.
3.
ColemanJ. M., & DoverG. M. (1989). Rating Inventory for Screening Kindergartners. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
4.
CronbachL.J., & MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
5.
deHirschK.JanskyJ., & LangfordW. S. (1966). Predicting reading failure. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
FeshbachS.AdelmanA., & FullerW. W. (1974). Early identification of children with high risk of reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(10), 49–54.
7.
FeuersteinR. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
8.
FletcherJ. M. & SatzP. (1984). Test-based versus teacher-based predictions of academic achievement: A three-year longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9(2), 193–203.
9.
JoinerL. M. (1977). A technical analysis of the variation in screening instruments and programs in New York State. New York: City University of New York, Center for Advanced Study in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction service #ED 154 596).
10.
LichtensteinR. (1981). Comparative validity of two preschool screening tests: Correlational and classificational approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(2), 68–72.
11.
MannV. A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 117–136.
12.
McCallR. & ApplebaumM. (1983). Design and analysis in developmental psychology. In MussenP. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 415–476). New York: Wiley.
13.
MeiselsS. J. (1985). Developmental screening in early childhood: A guide (rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
14.
MeiselsS. J. (1987). Uses and abuses of developmental screening and school readiness testing. Young Children, 43(2), 4–6, 68–73.
15.
MercerC. D.AlgozzineB., & TrifilettiJ. (1988). Early identification: An analysis of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 12–24.
16.
Michigan Department of Education. (1984). Superintendent's Study Group on Early Childhood Education. Lansing, MI: Author.
17.
MuehlP. E., & ForellE. R. (1973). A follow-up study of disabled readers: Variables related to high school reading performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 110–123.
18.
PedhazurE. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19.
SatzP. & FletcherJ. M. (1979). Early screening tests: Some uses and abuses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(1), 65–69.
20.
SatzP. & FletcherJ. M. (1988). Early identification of learning disabled children: An old problem revisited. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 824–829.
21.
VaccN. A.VaccN. N., & FogelmanM. S. (1987). Preschool screening: Using the DIAL as a predictor of first-grade performance. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 45–51.
