The present study examined the impact of maternal labeling of children as gifted on the sibling relationship. Subjects were 144 pairs of firstborn and secondborn siblings classified according to maternal perceptions into one of four groups: both gifted, firstborn gifted, secondborn gifted, or neither gifted. Five aspects of the sibling relationship were examined: Warmth/Closeness, Status/Power, Conflict, Maternal Partiality, and Paternal Partiality. Results indicated that unlabeled children generally did not view the sibling relationship more negatively than their labeled siblings. However, there was consistent evidence of labeling effects which interacted with birth order. Maternal labeling of firstborn children was associated with greater Warmth/Closeness in the sibling relationship, but maternal labeling of secondborn children appeared to have the opposite effect of reduced Warmth/Closeness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalleringL. D., & KochA. (1984). Family relations when a child is gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 140–143.
2.
BarbeW. (1956). A study of the family background of the gifted. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 302–309.
3.
BridgesS. (1973). IQ-150. New York: Crane, Russak, & Co.
4.
CohenJ. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with the provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213–220.
5.
ColangeloN., & BrowerP. (1987a). Gifted youngsters and their siblings: Long-term impact of labeling on their academic and personal self-concept. Roeper Review, 10, 101–103.
CornellD. G. (1983). Gifted children: The impact of positive labeling on the family system. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 322–335.
8.
CornellD. G. (1984). Families of gifted children. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.
9.
CornellD. G. (1989). Child adjustment and parent use of the term “gifted.”Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 59–64.
10.
CornellD. G., & GrossbergI. N. (1986). Siblings of children in gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9, 253–264.
11.
CornellD. G., & GrossbergI. N. (1989). Parent use of the term “gifted”: Correlates with family environment and adjustment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 218–230.
12.
ErnstC., & AngstJ. (1983). Birth order: Its influence on personality. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
FisherE. (1978). An investigation into the effects of positive labeling on the families of gifted children. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
14.
FisherE. (1981). The effect of labeling on gifted children and their families. Roeper Review, 3, 49–51.
15.
FurmanW., & BuhrmesterD. (1985). Children's perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships. Child Development, 56, 448–461.
16.
GrenierM. E. (1985). Gifted children and other siblings. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29164–167.
17.
HollingsheadA. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
18.
LambM. E., & Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.). (1982). Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
PfoutsJ. H. (1976). The sibling relationship: A forgotten dimension. Social Work, 21, 200–204.
20.
PfoutsJ. H. (1980). Birth order, age spacing, I.Q. differences and family relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 517–521.
21.
PulakosJ. (1987). The effects of birth order on perceived family roles. Individual Psychology, 43, 319–328.
22.
RenzulliJ. S., & McGreevyA. M. (1986). Twins included and not included in special programs for the gifted. Roeper Review, 9, 120–127.
23.
RobinsonA. (1986). Brave new directions: Needed research on the labeling of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 11–14.
24.
RobinsonN. M.ChamradD. L., & JanosP. (1987, April). Sibling relationships in families of gifted children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Washington, DC.
25.
RossA. O. (1972). The exceptional child in the family. New York: Grune & Stratton.
26.
SchacterF. F. (1982). Sibling deidentification and split-parent identification: A family tetrad. In LambM. E. & Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan. (pp. 125–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
SilvermanL., & WatersJ. (1987, April). Exploding the myth of the non-gifted sibling. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, New Orleans.
28.
TesserA. (1980). Self-esteem maintenance in family dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 77–91.
29.
TuttleD. H. (1991). Positive labeling and the sibling relationship in families with gifted children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
