Implementing a Successful Writing Program in Public Schools for Students Who are Deaf

Abstract

A 2-year project to improve the writing skills of children who are deaf included instruction for teachers in the process approach to teaching writing. The project encompassed 10 public school programs for students who are deaf and included 325 students in Grades 4–10 and 52 teachers. The project included specific training goals for teachers, a self-report procedure for the teachers, and a data-collection and analysis phase to assess short-term effects on students' writing. Teacher self-reports indicated widespread involvement in the project, and pretest and posttest results showed dramatic improvement in students' writing—particularly in grammatical skills. Scoring systems for students' papers are included.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Applebee

A. N.

(1982). Writing and learning in school settings. In Nystrand

P. M.

(Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discours. (pp. 365–382). New York: Academic Press.

Baxter

, & Kwalick

(1984). Holism and the teaching of writing (Research Report). New York: Scribner Educational Publishers.

Clifford

(1981). Composing in stages: The effects of a collaborative pedagogy. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(1), 37–53.

Heider

, & Heider

(1940). A comparison of sentence structure of deaf and hearing children. Psychological Monographs, 52(1), 42–103.

Hillocks

(1987). Synthesis of research on teaching writing. Educational Leadership, 44, 71–76.

Humes

(1983). Research on the composing process. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 201–216.

Kluwin

(1979). The effects of selected errors on the written discourse of deaf adolescents. Directions, 1(2), 46–53.

Knudson

R. E.

(1988). The effects of highly structured versus less structured lessons on student writing. Journal of Educational Research, 81(6), 365–368.

Livingston

(1989). Revision strategies of deaf student writers. American Annals of the Deaf, 134, 21–26.

10.

Mather

(1989). Visually oriented teaching strategies with deaf preschool children. In Lucas

(Ed.), The sociolinguistics of the deaf community (pp. 165–190). New York: Academic Press.

11.

Moriarity

D. J.

(1978). An investigation of the effects of instruction in five components of the writing process on the quality and syntactic complexity of students' writing (Research Report). Framingham, MA: Framingham State University.

12.

Mullis

(1980). Using the primary trait system for evaluating.writing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

13.

Soltis

, & Walberg

(1989). Thirteen-year-olds' writing achievements: A secondary analysis of the fourth national assessment of writing. Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 22–29.

14.

Stuckless

, & Birch

(1966). The influence of early manual communication on the linguistic development of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 111(4), 425–460, 499–504.

15.

Taylor

(1969). A language analysis of the writing of deaf children (Final Report). Tallahassee: Department of English, Florida State University.

16.

Thompson

(1936). Analysis of errors in written composition by deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 81(2), 95–99.

17.

Walter

(1955). A study of the written sentence construction of a group of profoundly deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 100(3), 235–252.