During the 1980s, innovative use of technology was equated with microcomputer instruction. In the 1990s, a different kind of technology—videodisc instruction—has great potential for application in secondary special education. By examining its day-to-day use in naturalistic settings, this study builds on previous research with a specific videodisc program in fractions. Participants were seven secondary teachers of students with learning disabilities. Researchers measured the program's level of implementation, teacher reactions, and student achievement. Results were generally positive in all areas, with a surprisingly high acceptance of the program by the seven teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerH. (1987). Using computers for instruction. Byte, 12(2), 149–162.
2.
BeckerH.SterlingC. (1987). Equity in school computer use: National data and neglected considerations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(3), 289–311.
3.
BerlinerD. (1985). The executive functions of teaching. In OsbornJ.WilsonP.AndersonR. (Eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America (pp. 87–108). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
4.
BermanP.McLaughlinM. (1976). Implementation of educational innovations. Educational Forum, 40(3), 345–370.
5.
BlaschkeC. (1985). Technology trends in special education. T.H.E. Journal, 14(2), 73–77.
6.
BorkA. (1981). Educational technology and the future. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 10(1), 3–19.
7.
BrophyJ.GoodT. L. (1986). Teacher and student achievement. In WittrockM. (Ed.), The third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
8.
BuckeleyW. (1988, June 16). Computers failing as teaching aids. The Wall Street Journal, p. 15.
9.
CohenD. (1987). Educational technology, policy, and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 153–170.
CubanL. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
DuckworthK.FieldingG. (1985). Management implications of teachers' design and use of tests in high school classes. (Final Report to the National Institute of Education.) Eugene: University of Oregon, Center for Education Policy and Management.
13.
FullanM. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
GerstenR.CarnineD.ZorefL.CroninD. (1986). A multifaceted study of change in seven inner-city schools. Elementary School Journal, 86(3), 257–276.
15.
GoodT. L.GrouwsD. A.EbmeierH. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
16.
GuskeyT. R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 245–259.
17.
HasselbringT.SherwoodB.BransfordJ. (1986). An evaluation of the Mastering Fractions level–one instructional videodisc program. Nashville: George Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, The Learning Technology Center.
18.
HofmeisterA. (1984). Special education in the information age. Peabody Journal of Education, 62(1), 5–22.
19.
HubermanA.MilesM. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.
20.
KellyB.CarnineD. W.GerstenR.GrossenB. (1986). The effectiveness of videodisc instruction in teaching fractions to learning handicapped and remedial high school students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(2), 5–17.
21.
KellyB.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(1), 23–29.
22.
LeinhardtG.SmithD. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 247–271.
23.
LoucksS. F.ZaccheiD. A. (1983). Applying our findings to today's innovations. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 28–31.
24.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1988). NAEP: Results of the fourth mathematics assessment. Education Week, 28–29.
25.
OkoloC.RiethH.PolsgroveL.BahrC.YerkesK. (1985). An analysis of secondary special education teachers' attitudes toward computer-based instruction (Research Rep. No. 103). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
26.
Optical Data. (1988). Windows on science [videodisc program]. Orangewood, NJ: Author.
27.
PapertS. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
28.
RiethH.BahrC.OkoloC.PolsgroveL.EckertR. (1988). An analysis of the secondary special education classroom ecology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(4), 425–441.
29.
RothmanR. (1988, April 13). ‘Computer competence’ still rare among students, assessment finds. Education Week, pp. 1, 20.
30.
SemmelM.LieberJ. (1986). Computer applications in instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 18(9), 1–12.
31.
ShowersB.JoyceB.BennettB. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 11–23.
32.
SniderW. (1986, January 11). Computers: A change in course?Education Week, pp. 1, 14.
33.
Systems Impact, Inc. (1986). Mastering fractions. [videodisc program]. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
WestP. (1988, October 24). Chiefs eye barriers to technology. Education Week, p. 5.
35.
WolcottH. (1981). Is there life after technology? Some lessons on change. Educational Technology, 5, 24–28.
36.
WoodwardJ. (1990). Causal discourse and its effect on recall and understanding in science (Tech. Rep. #12). Eugene: University of Oregon, Instructional Research.
