This article addresses instructional issues related to the teaching of expository writing. Exceptional students' writing difficulties are examined in relationship to the writing process, expository text structures, and students' metacognitive knowledge. Approaches to the teaching of expository writing are discussed, and a dialogic approach, involving teacher modeling and a series of think sheets, is described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplebeeA. N. (1984). Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
BosC. S. (1988). Process oriented writing with mildly handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 521–527.
3.
BosC. S., & FilipD. (1984). Comprehension monitoring in learning disabled and average students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 229–233.
4.
EnglertC. S.RaphaelT. E., & AndersonL. M. (1986, December). Metacognitive knowledge and writing skills of upper elementary students and students with special needs: Extensions of text structure research. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
5.
EnglertC. S.RaphaelT. E.AndersonL. M.AnthonyH.FearK., & GreggS. (in press). A case for writing intervention: Strategies for writing informational text. Learning Disabilities Focus.
6.
EnglertC. S.RaphaelT. E.FearK. L., & AndersonL. M. (in press). Students' metacognitive knowledge about writing informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly.
7.
EnglertC. S.StewartS. R., & HiebertE. H. (in press). Young writers' use of text structure in expository text generation. Journal of Educational Psychology.
8.
EnglertC. S., & ThomasC. C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison of learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 93–105.
9.
FitzgeraldJ., & TeasleyA. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children's writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 424–432.
10.
FlowerL., & HayesJ. R. (1980). Writing as problem solving. Visible Language, 14, 388–399.
11.
GordonC. J., & BraunC. (1985). Metacognitive processes: Reading and writing narrative discourse. In Forrest-PressleyD. L.MacKinnonG. E., & WallerT. G. (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 1–75). New York: Academic Press.
12.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. (1986, April). Improving learning disabled students' compositions via story grammar training: A component analysis of self-control strategy training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
13.
GravesD. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
HillocksG. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133–170.
16.
HillocksG. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference for Research in English.
17.
LangerJ. A. (1984). Literacy instruction in American schools: Problems and perspectives. American Journal of Education, 93, 107–132.
18.
MeichenbaumD., & AsarnowJ. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In KendallP. C. & HollanS. D. (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research and procedures (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press.
19.
NodineB. F.BarenbaumE., & NewcomerP. (1985). Story composition by learning disabled, reading disabled, and normal children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 167–181.
20.
RaphaelT. E.EnglertC. S., & KirschnerB. W. (1986). The impact of text structure instruction and social context on students' comprehension and production of expository text. (Research Series No. 177). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
21.
RaphaelT. E.EnglertC. S.KirschnerB. M., & BonkowskiN. (1986). Text structure instruction in process writing classrooms: Individual differences in upper elementary students' responses to instruction. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
22.
RumelhartD. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C., & BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
ScardamaliaM., & BereiterC. (1986). Research on written composition. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.
24.
TaylorB. M., & BeachR. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.
25.
ThomasC. C.EnglertC. S., & GreggS. (1987). An analysis of errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 21–30.
26.
WalmsleyS. A. (1984). Helping the learning disabled child overcome writing disabilities in the classroom. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 3, 81–90.
27.
WilliamsJ. P. (1986). Teaching children to identify the main idea of expository texts. Exceptional Children, 53, 163–168.
