Relationship between Teachers' Effectiveness and Their Tolerance for Handicapped Students

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between classroom teachers' self-reported tolerance levels for maladaptive behavior in their classrooms and experienced supervisors' evaluations of the teachers' effectiveness. Teachers were assessed on the Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Form (TEEF), covering research-based practices for effective instruction for low-achieving students. Self-report instruments measured teachers' tolerance for maladaptive behavior and their propensity to resist placement of handicapped students in their classes. Those teachers with the most effective teaching strategies for low-achieving students tended to report (a) that they tolerate less maladaptive behavior in their classrooms and (b) that they may actively resist placement of handicapped students in their rooms.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brophy

, & Good

(1986). Teacher and student achievement. In Wittrock

(Ed.), The third handbook of research on teaching. New York: McMillan.

Brookover

, (1981). Schools can make a difference. East Lansing, MI: College of Urban Development, Michigan State University.

Clark

T. A.

, & McCarthy

D. P.

(1983). School improvement in New York City: An appraisal of some recent trends. Educational Researcher, 12, 17–24.

Edmonds

(1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 9(5), 28–32.

Englert

C. S.

(1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38–47.

Gerber

M. M.

, & Semmel

M. I.

(1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19(3), 137–148.

Gersten

Carnine

, & Williams

(1982). Measuring implementation of a stuctured educational model in an urban setting: An observational approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 67–69.

Gersten

Carnine

Zoref

, & Cronin

(1986). Measuring implementation of educational innovations in a broad context. Elementary School Journal, 86, 257–276.

Gersten

Meyer

Zoref

(1979). Teacher effectiveness evaluation form. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.

10.

Good

(1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 415–422.

11.

Good

, & Weinstein

(1986). Teacher expectations: A framework for exploring classrooms. In Zumwalt

(Ed.). Improving Teaching (pp. 67–86). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

12.

Gresham

F. M.

(1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 422–433.

13.

Rosenshine

(1986). Synthesis of research on explicity teaching. Educational Research, 43, 60–69.

14.

Thurlow

Christenson

, & Ysseldyke

(1983). Referral research: An integrative summary of findings. (Research Report # 141). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

15.

Walker

H. M.

, (1984). SBS Program: A systematic approach to the integration of handicapped children into less restrictive settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 6(4), 421–431.

16.

Walker

H. M.

, & Rankin

(1983). Assessing the behavior expectations and demands of less restrictive settings. School Psychology Review, 12, 274–284.

17.

Ysseldyke

, & Thurlow

(1983). Identification/classification research: An integrative summary of findings. (Research Report # 142). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.