Recent cognitive analyses of reading indicate the importance of fluent word identification skills in reading comprehension. These analyses suggest that children who experience difficulties in the acquisition of fluent word decoding skills will be limited in their development of higher level comprehension processes in reading. Recent advances in computer technology create the possibility of providing much greater amounts of fluency oriented practice in decoding skills than is possible in most traditional programs. A few beginning studies provide support for the idea that computers may be helpful in reading instruction for handicapped children by providing large amounts of practice in the word identification skills that are necessary before good comprehension of written materials can occur.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonR. C.HiebertE. H.ScottJ. A., & WilkersonI. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
2.
AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J., & AndersonM. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in connected discourse. American Education Research Journal, 15, 433–440.
3.
BaronJ. (1978). Access to meanings of printed words: Some implications for reading and learning to read. In MurrayF. (Ed.), The recognition of words: IRA series on the development of the reading process. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
CaseR. (1978). Intellectual development from birth to adulthood: A neo-Piagetian interpretation. In SieglerR. S. (Ed.), Children thinking: What develops (pp. 37–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
DahlemW. E., & TorgesenJ. K. (1985). The effects of supplemental auditory information on the reading comprehension performance of learning disabled high school students. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.
6.
EhriL., & WilceL. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3–18.
7.
FlavellJ. H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
HogaboamT. W., & PerfettiC. A. (1978). Reading skill and the role of verbal experience in decoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 717–729.
9.
HornW. F.O'DonnellJ. P., & VitulanoL. A. (1983). Long-term follow-up studies of learning-disabled persons. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 542–555.
10.
JonesK.TorgesenJ. K., & SextonM. A. (in press). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilties.
11.
LaBergeD., & SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
12.
LesgoldA. M., & ResnickL. B. (1982). How reading difficulties develop: Perspectives from a longitudinal study. In DasJ. P.MulcahyR. F., & WallA. E. (Eds.), Theory and research in learning disabilities (pp. 155–187). New York: Plenum Press.
13.
ManisF. R. (1985). Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 78–90.
14.
MoyerS. B. (1982). Repeated reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 619–632.
15.
ParisS. G., & MeyersM. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Heading Behavior, 13, 5–22.
16.
PerfettiC. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
PerfettiC. A. (1984). Reading acquisition and beyond: Decoding includes cognition. American Journal of Education, 33, 40–61.
18.
PerfettiC. A., & HogaboamT. W. (1975). The relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469.
19.
PerfettiC. A., & LesgoldA. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In JustM. & CarpenterP. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
20.
PerfettiC. A., & RothS. F. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skills. In LesgoldA. M. & PerfettiC. A. (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
RashotteC. A., & TorgesenJ. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–188.
22.
ResnickL. B., & FordW. W.The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
RoblyerM. D., & KingF. J. (1983, January). Reasonable expectations for computer-based instruction in basic reading skills. Paper presented at meetings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
24.
RothS. F., & BeckI. L. (in press). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly.
25.
RothS. F., & BeckI. L. (1984, April). Research and instructional issues related to the enhancement of children's decoding skills through a microcomputer program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
26.
RyanE. B.WeedK. A., & ShortE. J. (1986). Cognitive behavior modification: Promoting active, self-regulatory learning styles. In TorgesenJ. & WongB. Y. L. (Eds.), Psychological and educational projectives on learning disabilities (pp. 367–397). New York: Academic Press.
27.
SalisburyD. F. (in press). Effective drill and practice strategies. In LonassenD. (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
SieglerR. S. (1983). Information processing approaches to development. In FlavellJ. H. & MarkmanE. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1, history, theory and methods (4th ed., pp. 129–211). New York: Wiley.
29.
StanovichK. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.
30.
StanovichK. E. (1982). Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading I: Word decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 485–493.
31.
TorgesenJ. K.CohenA., & WatersM. (1986). Development of a program to build rapid word recognition in learning disabled children. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.
32.
TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.GreensteinL.HouckG.PortesP. (in press). Academic difficulties of learning disabled children who perform poorly on memory span tests. In SwansonH. L. (Ed.). Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
33.
TorgesenJ. K., & WolfH. (1986). Computers and reading instruction: Lessons from the past, promise for the future. In PavlidisG. T. & FisherD. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Neuropsychology and treatment. Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons.
34.
WarnerM. M.SchumakerJ. B.AlleyG. R., & DeshlerD. D. (1980). Learning disabled adolescents in the public schools: Are they different from other low achievers?Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1, 27–36.
35.
WongP. (1984). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In Forrest-PressleyD. L.MacKinnonG. E. & WallerT. G. (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance, (Vol. 2, pp. 137–180). New York: Academic Press.
