The second special education case decided by the U. S. Supreme Court, Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, is discussed. The case provides some criteria for determining which related services are required under the EHA. These criteria are discussed in relation to recent and future special education cases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School v. Rowley, 102 S. Ct. 3034 (1982).
2.
Doe v. Colburg, 555 p. 2d 753 (1976).
3.
Espino v. Besteiro, 520 F. Supp 905 (1981).
4.
Hawaii Department of Education v. Katherine D., No. 82:4096 (9th Or. No. 7, 1983).
5.
Hurry v. Jones, 560 F. Supp 500 (1983).
6.
In re Family A., 602 P. 2d 157 (1979).
7.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 104 S. Ct. 3371 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1984).
8.
Tatro v. State Texas, 481, F. Supp 1724 (1979).
9.
Tatro v. State Texas, 625 F. 2d 557 (1980).
10.
T.G. and P.G. v. Board of Education of Piscataway, N.J., 576 F. Supp 420 (1983).
11.
Tokarcik v. Forest Hills School District, 665 F 2d 443 (1981).
