A model of special education is presented in this article based on the use of a direct and repeated measurement and evaluation system for developing effective educational programs. The major premise in applying this system is the development of a continuous data base across all educational decisions, including initial problem selection, program planning, program implementation and evaluation, and program certification. To highlight the issues, two separate studies are included, presenting student outcome data at both the individual and system level, for academic and social behaviors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerganJ. (1977). Behavioral consultation.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
2.
BergquistC. G. (1982). A methodology for validating placement of children in exceptional child programs. Exceptional Children, 49(3), 269–270.
3.
CarlbergC., & KavaleK. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14(3), 295–309.
4.
DenoS.JenkinsJ., & MirkinP. (1979). Measuring pupil progress toward the least restrictive environment. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 2(4), 81–92.
5.
DenoS.MarstonD.MirkinP.LowryL.SindelarP., & JenkinsJ. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Research Report No. 87). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 129).
6.
DenoS. L.MarstonD., & MirkinP. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.
7.
DenoS., & MirkinP. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual.Minneapolis, MN.: University of Minnesota, Leadership Training Institute/Special Education.
8.
DenoS.MirkinP., & ShinnM. (1979). Behavioral perspectives on the assessment of learning disabled children (Monograph No. 12). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
9.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K., & ChiangB. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 36–45.
10.
DenoS.MirkinP.LowryL., & KuehnleK. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 21). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 508).
11.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K., & WessonC. (1984). Procedures for writing data-based IEPs. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 16(2), 94–104.
12.
EngelmannS.GranzinA., & SeversonH. (1979). Diagnosing instruction. Journal of Special Education, 13, 355–363.
13.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L., & RoettgerA. (1983). The effect of alternative data-utilization rules on spelling achievement: An N of 1 study (Research Report No. 120). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 844).
14.
GermannG. (1983a). Procedural manual: Academic behaviors. Unpublished manuscript, Pine County Special Education Cooperative, Sandstone, Minnesota.
15.
GermannG. (1983b). Procedural manual: Social behaviors. Unpublished manuscript, Pine County Special Education Cooperative, Sandstone, Minnesota.
16.
GermannG. (1983c). Procedural manual: Mainstream consultation. Unpublished manuscript, Pine County Special Education Cooperative, Sandstone, Minnesota.
17.
GermannG. (1983d). Procedural manual: Vocational and life skills. Unpublished manuscript, Pine County Special Education Cooperative, Sandstone, Minnesota.
18.
GermannG. (1983e). Procedural manual: Problem solving. Unpublished manuscript, Pine County Special Education Cooperative, Sandstone, Minnesota.
19.
GlassG. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
20.
GlassG. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. In ShulmanL. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5, pp. 351–379).
21.
GlassG. V. (1983). Effectiveness of special education. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 65–78.
22.
HaringN., & LovittT. (1969). The application of functional analysis of behavior by teachers in a natural setting. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Experimental Education Unit, Seattle.
HerschR. H., & WalkerH. M. (1983). Great expectations: Making schools effective for all students. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 147–188.
25.
HersenM., & BarlowD. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs.New York: Pergammon Press.
26.
HowellK., & KaplanJ. (1980). Diagnosing basic skills: A handbook for deciding what to teach.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
27.
JohnsonG. O. (1962). Special education for the mentally handicapped—A paradox. Exceptional Children, 29, 62–69.
28.
KazdinA., & WilsonG. (1978). Evaluation of behavior therapy: Issues, evidence and research strategies.Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
29.
KratochwillT. R. (1978). Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change.New York: Academic Press.
30.
LakinK. C. (1983). A response to Gene V. Glass. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 233–240.
31.
LeinhardtG., & PalleyA. (1982). Restrictive educational settings: Exile or haven?Review of Educational Research, 52(4), 557–578.
32.
MartinM. (1982). A comparison of variations in data utilization procedures on the reading performance of mildly handicapped students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
33.
MirkinP.DenoS.FuchsL.WessonC.TindalG.MarstonD., & KuehnleK. (1981). Procedures to monitor student progress on IEP goals.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
34.
ReynoldsM., & BirchJ. (1982). Teaching exceptional children in all America's schools.Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
35.
SidmanM. (1960). Tactics of scientific research.New York: Basic Books.
36.
SindelarP. T., & DenoS. L. (1978). The effectiveness of resource programming. Journal of Special Education12(1), 17–28.
37.
SkibaR.MarstonD.WessonC.SevcikB., & DenoS. (1983). Characteristics of the time-series data collected through curriculum-based reading measurement (Research Report No. 125). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 197).
38.
Sulzer-AzaroffB., & MayerR. (1977). Applying behavior-analysis procedures with children and youth.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
39.
TawneyJ., & GastD. (1984). Single subject research in special education.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
40.
TindalG. (1985). Investigating the effectiveness of special education: An analysis of methodology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(2), 101–112.
41.
TindalG., & GermannG. (1985). Outcome evaluations of special education. Unpublished raw data.
42.
TindalG., & MarstonD. (1985). Approaches to assessment. In TorgesonJ. & WongB. (Eds), Learning disabilities: Some new perspectives.Boston: Academic Press.
43.
WhiteO. R., & HaringN. G. (1981). Exceptional teaching.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
