This is the first of two articles on implementing a prereferral intervention model as the first step in the special education services delivery system. A description of the model and rationale for it are provided. In the follow-up article, which will appear in the April issue of Exceptional Children, implementation of the model and its effects on consultation, testing, and placement practices are described.
AlgozzineB., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1981). Special education services for normal children: Better safe than sorry. Exceptional Children, 48, 238–243.
3.
AlgozzineB.ChristensonS., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1982). Probabilities associated with the referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5(3), 19–23.
4.
AlgozzineB.YsseldykeJ. E., & ChristensonS. (1983). An analysis of the incidence of special class placement: The masses are burgeoning. Journal of Special Education, 17, 141–147.
5.
BerganJ. (1977). Behavioral consultation.Columbus OH: Charles E. Merrill.
6.
ChristensonS.YsseldykeJ., & AlgozzineB. (1982). Institutional constraints and external pressures influencing referral decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 341–345.
7.
ChristensonS.YsseldykeJ. E.WangJ. J., & AlgozzineB. (1983). Teacher attributions for problems that result in referral for psychoeducational evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 174–180.
8.
CurtisM. J., & MeyersJ. (1985). Best practices in school-based consultation. In ThomasA. & GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 79–94). Washington DC: National Association for School Psychologists.
9.
EppsS.YsseldykeJ. E., & AlgozzineB. (1983). Impact of different definitions of learning disabilities on the number of students identified. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 341–352.
10.
FosterG. G.YsseldykeJ. E.CaseyA., & ThurlowM. L. (1984). The congruence between reason for referral and placement outcome. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 209–217.
11.
GradenJ. L.CaseyA., & BonstromO. (1983). Pre-referral interventions: Effects on referral rates and teacher attitudes (Research Report No: 140).Minneapolis, MN: Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
12.
Idol-MaestasL. (1983). Special educators' consultation handbook.Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
13.
MeyersJ.ParsonsR. D., & MartinR. (1979). Mental health consultation in the schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
ParsonsR. D., & MeyersJ. (1984). Developing consultation skills: A guide to training, development, and assessment for human services professionals.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
SarasonS. B., & DorisJ. (1979). Educational handicap, public policy, and social history.New York: Macmillan.
16.
ThurlowM. L., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1982). Instructional planning: Information collected by school psychologists vs. information considered useful by teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 3–10.
17.
ThurlowM. L.YsseldykeJ. E., & CaseyA. (1984). Teacher's perceptions of criteria for identifying LD students. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 349–355.
18.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB., & EppsS. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practices in classifying students as handicapped. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166.
19.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB.RicheyL., & GradenJ. L. (1982). Declaring students eligible for learning disability services: Why bother with the data?Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 37–44.
20.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB.ShinnM., & McGueM. (1982). Similarities and differences between underachievers and students classified learning disabled. Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.
21.
YsseldykeJ. E.ThurlowM.GradenJ.WessonC.AlgozzineB., & DenoS. (1983). Generalizations from five years of research on assessment and decision making: The University of Minnesota Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 75–93.
22.
ZinsJ. E., & CurtisM. J. (1984). Building consultation into the educational service delivery system. In MaherC. A.IllbackR. J., & ZinsJ. E. (Eds.), Organizational psychology in the schools: A handbook for professionals.Springfield IL: Charles C Thomas.
