BogdanR. (1980). The softside of hard data. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 411–412.
2.
BogdanR., & BiklenS. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
3.
BogdanR., & TaylorS. (1982). Inside/out: The social meaning of mental retardation.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4.
CampbellD. (1974). Qualitative knowing in action research. Paper presented at the 1974 Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.
5.
CampbellD. (1979). “Degree of freedom” and the case study. In CookT. & ReichardtC. (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
6.
CampbellD., & StanleyJ. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
7.
CookT., & ReichardtC. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research.Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
8.
CronbachL. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.
9.
DaltonM. (1967). Preconceptions and methods in men who manage. In HammondP. (Ed.), Sociologists at work.New York: Anchor.
10.
DenzinN. (1978). The research act (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
EdgertonR. (1967). The cloak of competence.Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
EdgertonR. (1984). The participant-observer approach to research in mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 498–505.
13.
EdgertonR., & BercoviciS. (1976). The cloak of competence: Years later. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 485–497.
14.
EdgertonR., BollingerM., & HerrB. (1984). The cloak of competence: After two decades. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 345–351.
15.
FilsteadW. (1979). Qualitative methods: A needed perspective in evaluation research. In CookT. & ReichardtC. (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research.Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
16.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory.Mill Valley CA: Sociology Press.
17.
GubaE. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation.Los Angeles: University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation.
18.
HomansG. (1962). Sentiments and activities: Essays in social science.New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
19.
HouseE. R. (1977). The logic of evaluative argument. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation, No. 7.Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.
20.
LeCompteM., & GoetzJ. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.
ReichardtC., & CookT. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In CookT. & ReichardtC. (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research.Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
23.
RistR. (1977). Overview on the relations among educational research paradigms: From disdain to detente. Anthropology & Educational Quarterly, 8, 42–49.
24.
SchwartzH., & JacobsJ. (1979). Qualitative sociology: A method to the madness.New York: The Free Press.
25.
SmithJ. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issues. Educational Researcher, 12, 6–13.
26.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (1984). Broadening the research perspective in special education. Exceptional Children, 50, 400–409.
27.
StainbackS., & StainbackW. (in press). Methodological considerations in qualitative research. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
28.
TaylorS., & BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings.New York: John Wiley.
29.
WilsonS. (1977). The use of ethnographic techniques in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 47, 245–265.