Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

P.L. 94–142 requires that parents become involved in the educational decision-making of their handicapped child. For parents to become involved, they need to be familiar with the various complexities of the law so they can make informed decisions about their child's education. State and local education agencies inform parents primarily through printed materials. This study surveyed materials used by the 50 states and evaluated their comprehensibility. A computer program, using four common readability formulas, analyzed selected passages for their readability. Other factors also analyzed included print size, use of examples, comprehensibility, and page density. Results indicated a range of reading levels from grades five through eight. These results are interpreted in the context of reading literacy. Issues involved in development of materials for parents and future analysis of these materials are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andraski

Heimberg

R. G.

Edlund

S. R.

, & Blankenberg

Assessing readability levels of self-report assertion inventories. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981 49(1), 142–144.

Andraski

, & Murphy

W. D.

Assessing the readability of thirty-nine behavior modification training manuals and primers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1977, 10, 341–344.

Carrol

J. B.

, & Chall

J. S.

Toward a literate society. New York: McGraw Hill, 1975).

Davison

, & Kanter

R. N.

On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly, 1982, XVII, 187–209.

Dembinski

R. J.

, & Mauser

A. J.

What parents of the learning disabled really want from professionals. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 578–584.

Dentch

G. E.

O'Farrell

T. J.

, & Cutter

H. S. G.

Readability of marital assessment measures used by behavioral marriage therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48(6), 790–792.

Educational Testing Service. Learning to read. Focus, 1978, 4, 1–16.

Educational Testing Service. New vistas in special education. Focus, 1980, 8, 1–20.

Forbes

F. W.

, & Cottle

W. C.

A new method for determining readability of standardized tests. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953, 37(3), 185–190.

10.

Goldstein

Strickland

Turnbull

A. P.

, & Curry

An observational analysis of the IEP conference. Exceptional Children, 1980, 6, 278–286.

11.

Harber

J. R.

Syntactic complexity: A necessary ingredient in predicting readability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 437–443.

12.

Hoff

M. K.

Fenton

K. S.

Yoshida

, & Kaufman

M. J.

Notice and consent: The school's responsibility to inform parents. Journal of School Psychology, 1978, 16, 265–273.

13.

Klare

G. R.

Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 1974–75, 1, 62–102.

14.

Kroth

R. L.

, & Scholl

G. T.

Getting schools involved with parents. Reston VA: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 155 831).

15.

Madron

B. B.

Design of a computer-based system for research in and teaching of literature. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). George Peabody College for Teachers, Nashville TN, 1979.

16.

Mitchell

Parental perceptions of their experiences with due process in special education. A preliminary report. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 130–482).

17.

Moe

A. J.

Analyzing text with computers: The state of the technology, 1979. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. 179–919).

18.

Northcutt

Functional literacy for adults: A status report of the adult performance level study, 1974. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 091–672).

19.

Polk

J. K.

A comparison of the readability of materials commonly used by adults with the average adult reading level in the United States, 1979. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 169–508).

20.

Roit

, & Pfohl

The readability of P.L. 94–142 parent materials: Are parents truly informed? Proceedings of the Convention National Association of School Psychologists 1982. (Summary).

21.

Rosenshine

New correlates of readability and listenability. In Figuree

J. A.

(Ed.), Reading and realism. Newark DE: International Reading Association, 1969.

22.

Turnbull

A. P.

Strickland

, & Goldstein

Training professionals and parents in developing and implementing the IEP. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1978, 13, 414–426.

The Readability of P.L. 94–142 Parent Materials: Are Parents Truly Informed?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References