Data are presented that provide an initial demonstration of the impact of two situational factors, setting (classroom or small testing room) and familiarity of the examiner (mother or unknown female), on the assessment performance of developmentally disabled preschool age children. A discussion is offered of the possible practical implications of these environmental variations in evaluation outcomes.
CapobiancoR. J.KnoxS.I.Q. estimates and the index of marital integration. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1964, 68, 718–721.
3.
CieutatV.FlickG.Examiner differences among Stanford-Binet items. Psychological Report, 1967, 21, 613–622.
4.
FillerJ. W.Sensorimotor assessment performance as a function of task materials. In BrickerD. D.BrickerW. A., Infant, toddler, and preschool research and intervention project report: Year III (IMRID Behavioral Science Monograph No. 23). Nashville TN: Institute on Mental Retardation and Intellectual Development, George Peabody College, 1973.
5.
HobbsN.The futures of children: Categories, labels, and their consequences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
6.
JacobsonL. I.BergerS. E.BergmanR. L.MillhamJ.GreesonL. E.Effects of age, sex, systematic conceptual learning, acquisition of learning sets, and programmed social interaction on the intellectual and conceptual development of preschool children from poverty backgrounds. Child Development, 1971, 42, 1399–1415.
7.
JohnsonD. L.The influences of social class and race on test performance and spontaneous speech of preschool children. Child Development, 1974, 45, 517–521.
8.
KatzL.RobertsS.RobinsonJ.Effects of task difficulty, race of administrator and instructions on digit-symbol performance of Negroes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 53–59.
9.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiements in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
10.
SacksE. L.Intelligence scores as a function of experimentally established social relationships between child and examiner. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 354–358.
11.
SeitzV.AbelsonW. D.LevineE.ZiglerE.Effects of place of testing on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test scores of disadvantaged Head Start and non-Head Start children. Child Development, 1975, 46, 481–486.
12.
StigenG. K.Heartaches and handicaps: An irreverent survival manual for parents. Palo Alto CA: Science and Behavior Books, 1976.
13.
TermanL. M.MerrillM. A.Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the third revision, form L-M. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960.
14.
ThomasS.HertzigM. E.DrymanI.FernandezP.Examiner effect in IQ testing of Puerto Rican working-class children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1971, 41, 809–821.
15.
WolfensbergerW.KurtzR. A.Measurement of parents' perceptions of their children's development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1971, 83, 3–92.
16.
ZiglerE.AbelsonW. D.SeitzV.Motivational factors in the performance of economically disadvantaged children on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Child Development, 1973, 44, 294–303.
