Children with spastic cerebral palsy, who often have difficulties with visual motor tasks, produced significantly better drawings when the color of black and white figure and ground drawing materials was reversed (i.e., using white pencil on black paper). The control group of normal children did not display the improved performance on the reversed color figure-ground format. It is hypothesized that the children with cerebral palsy, when working on the black background, may have been less distracted by the brightness of the background, and therefore better able to concentrate on the figure that they were drawing. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieM.Perceptual and visuo-motor disorders in cerebral palsy. London: Heinemann, 1964.
2.
AyersA. J.The southern California figure ground perception test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 1969.
3.
BenderL.A visual motor Gestalt test and its clinical use. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association, 1938.
4.
BirrenF.Light, color and environment. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1969.
5.
CarlsonE.Infantile cerebral palsy: Its treatment by selective inhibition of sensory stimuli. Annals of International Medicine, 1937, 11, 324–334.
6.
CruickshankW.BiceH.WallenN., & LynchK.Perception and cerebral palsy. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press, 1965.
7.
CruickshankW. M., & DolphinJ. E.The educational implications of psychological studies of cerebral-palsied children. Exceptional Children, 1951, 18, 1–8, 32.
8.
DelaneyF.An investigation into certain aspects of visual and visuo-motor perception in children with cerebral palsy. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1967, 28, 1293.
9.
DunnL.Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines MN: American Guidance Service, 1959.
10.
HaberR., & HershensonM.The psychology of visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1973.
11.
HarrisD.Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1963.
12.
KlebanoffS.SingerJ., & WilenskyH.Psychological consequences of brain lesions and ablations. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 51, 1–42.
13.
PatelS., & BharuchaE.The Bender Gestalt test as a measure of perceptual and visuo-motor deficits in cerebral palsied children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1972, 14, 156–160.
14.
SchonellF.Intelligence testing and educational problems and methods of teaching. In IllingworthR. (Ed.), Recent advances in cerebral palsy. London: Churchill, 1958.
15.
StraussA., & LehtinenL.Psychopathology and education of the brain injured child. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1947.
16.
UhlinD.The basis of art for neurologically handicapped children. In JakabI. (Ed.), Art interpretation and art therapy — Psychiatry and art therapy — Psychiatry and art II. New York: S. Karger, Basel, 1969.
17.
UhlinD.The effect of figure-ground reversal in the H-T-P drawings of spastic cerebral palsied children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1970, 26, 87–88.
18.
WernerH., & ThumaB.A deficiency in the perception of apparent motion in children with brain injury. American Journal of Psychology, 1942, 55, 58–67.
19.
WinerB.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
