This review takes a critical look at a major component of competency based teacher education: the derivation and validation of teacher competencies. The available literature indicates that teacher competencies tend to be derived from “expert” opinion rather than the direct observation of teacher behavior, that they often are not behaviorally stated or evaluated as to whether or not they have a positive impact on child performance, and that few teacher educators or researchers are attempting to validate competencies empirically before including them in teacher education programs. Research strategies to remediate these deficits are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmidonE.An approach to the study of teaching. In KnoblockP. & JohnsonJ. L. (Eds.), The teaching-learning process in educating emotionally disturbed children. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1967.
2.
BalowB.Personal communication to special education training programs, US Office of Education, 1971.
3.
BullockL. M., & WhelanR. J.Competencies needed by teachers of the emotionally disturbed and socially maladjusted: A comparison. Exceptional Children, 1971, 37, 485–489.
4.
CruickshankW. M. (Ed.) The teacher of brain-injured children. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1966.
DorwoodB.A comparison of the competencies for regular classroom teachers and teachers of emotionally disturbed children. Exceptional Children, 1963, 30, 67–73.
7.
FinkA. H.Teacher-pupil interaction in classes for the emotionally handicapped. Exceptional Children, 1972, 38, 469–474.
GetzelsJ. W., & JacksonP. W.The teacher's personality and characteristics. In GageN. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
10.
HallR. V., LundD., & JacksonD.Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 1–12.
11.
HaringN. G., & FargoG. A.Evaluating programs for preparing teachers of emotionally disturbed children. Exceptional Children, 1969, 36, 157–162.
12.
LillyM. S.A training based model for special education. Exceptional Children, 1971, 37, 745–749.
13.
MackieR. P., KvaraceusW., & WilliamsH.Teachers of children who are socially and emotionally handicapped. Washington, D.C.: USGPO, 1957.
14.
MadsenC. H., BeckerW. C., & ThomasD. R.Rules, praise and ignoring: Elements of elementary classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 139–150.
15.
MedleyD. M., & MitzelH. E.Measuring classroom behavior by systematic observation. In GageN. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
16.
MeisgeierC.The identification of successful teachers of mentally or physically handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 1965, 32, 229–235.
17.
MeyenE. L., ConnollyA. J., ChandlerM. R., & AltmanR.Prototype training program for the preparation of curriculum consultants for exceptional children. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. US Office of Education. Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, Division of Training. November, 1971.
18.
McKenzieH. S., EgnerA. N., KnightM. F., PerelmannP. D., SchneiderB. M., & GarvinJ. S.Training consulting teachers to assist elementary teachers in the management and education of handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 1970, 37, 137–143.
19.
National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. Standards for state approval of teacher education. Washington, D.C.: NASDTEC, 1971.
20.
NunnallyJ. C.Psychometric theory. St. Louis: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
21.
RosenshineB., & FurstN.Research on teacher performance criteria. In SmithB. O. (Ed.), Research in teacher education-A symposium. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
22.
ScheuerA. L.The relationship between personal attributes and effectiveness in teachers of the emotionally disturbed. Exceptional Children, 1971, 37, 723–731.
23.
SchwartzL.An integrated teacher education program for special education-A new approach. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 411–416.
24.
ShoresR. E.What behavior research says to the classroom teachers: An interview. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 1972, 4, 192–199.
25.
SmithB. O. (Ed.) Research in teacher education–A symposium. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
26.
TawneyJ. W.Practice what you preach: A proposal to develop a contingency-managed methods course, and to measure the effects of this course by in-field evaluation. Grant No. 271712, US Office of Education, 1973.
27.
ThomasD. R., BeckerW. C., & ArmstrongM.Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher's behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis1968, 1, 35–45.
28.
University of Oregon, Education Resource Center. Teacher competencies. Unpublished manuscript, n.d.
29.
WrightH. F. Observational child study. In MussenP. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in child development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1960.
