DunnL. M. (Ed.) Exceptional children in the schools.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
8.
DunnL. M.Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 1968, 35, 5–22.
9.
ElamS.The age of accountability dawns in Texarkana.Phi Delta Kappan, 1970, 51, 509–514.
10.
FisherH. K.What is special education?Special Education in Canada, 1967, 41, 9–16.
11.
FlanaganJ. C.Functional education for the seventies.Phi Delta Kappan, 1967, 49, 27–33.
12.
GeerW. C.Testimony.Hearings before the General Subcommittee on Education. Committee on Education and Labor. Washington, D.C.: USGPO, 1969.
13.
GlaserR.The program for individually prescribed instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, February 1966.
14.
JohnsonG. O.Special education for the mentally retarded—A paradox.Exceptional Children, 1962, 29, 62–69.
15.
JohnsonJ. L.Special education for the inner city: A challenge for the future or another means for cooling the mark out?The Journal of Special Education, 1969, 3, 241–251.
McCarthyJ. M.Testimony.Hearings before the General Subcommittee on Education. Committee on Education and Labor. Washington, D.C.: USGPO, 1969.
18.
ProutyR., & PrillamanD.Educational diagnosis: In clinic or classroom?Virginia Journal of Education, 1967, 61, 10–12.
19.
RegerR., SchroederW., & UscholdD.Special education: Children with learning problems.New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.
20.
VinagradoffV.The role and function of the diagnostic teacher. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Council for Exceptional Children, Denver, Colorado, April 1969.
21.
WrightJ. S.The Washington, D.C. school case. In WeinbergM. (Ed.), Integrated education: A reader.Beverly Hills: Glencoe Press, 1968. Pp. 207–213.