The research reviewed herein suggests that an increase in the efficiency of transfer occurs when (a) the retardate is relatively young; (b) a high similarity exists between tasks, such that a substantial amount of the training task can be transferred as a unit; and (c) meaningful pretraining of a general and varied nature is provided. The general nature of the verbal instructions provided the retardate also seems to influence transfer performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettC. D., EllisN. R., & PryerM. W.Stimulus pretraining and the delayed reaction in defectives.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1959, 64, 104–111.
2.
BaumeisterA., & KlosowskiR.An attempt to group toilet train severely retarded patients.Mental Retardation, 1965, 3, 24–26.
3.
BryantP. E.The effect of verbal instruction on transfer in normal and severely subnormal children.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 1964, 8, 35–43.
4.
BryantP. E.The transfer of positive and negative learning by normal and severely subnormal children.British Journal of Psychology, 1965, 56, 81–86. (a)
5.
BryantP. E.The transfer of sorting concepts by moderately retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1965, 70, 291–300. (b)
6.
ClarkeA. D. B., & BlakemoreC. B.Age and perceptual-motor transfer in imbeciles.British Journal of Psychology, 1961, 52, 125–131.
7.
ClarkeA. D. B., & CooksonM.Perceptual-motor transfer in imbeciles: A second series of experiments.British Journal of Psychology, 1962, 53, 321–330.
8.
DickersonD. J., GirardeauF. L., & SpradlinJ. E.Verbal pretraining and discrimination learning by retardates.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1964, 68, 476–484.
9.
HebbD. O.The organization of behaviour.London: Chapman and Hall, 1949.
10.
HirschW., & LowmanC. L.Motor skill transfer by trainable mentally retarded.Research Relating to Children, 1965, 19, 82.
11.
KatzP. J.Transfer of principles as a function of a course of study incorporating scientific method for the educable mentally retarded.Dissertation Abstracts, 1963, 24, 42–44.
12.
KaufmanM. E., & PrehmH. J.A review of research on learning sets and transfer of training in mental defectives. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 123–147.
13.
LashleyK. S., & WadeM.The Pavlovian theory of generalization.Psychological Review, 1946, 53, 72–87.
14.
MillerM. B., & GriffithB. C.The effects of training verbal associates on the performance of a conceptual task.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1961, 66, 270–276.
15.
NewmanF. L., & BaronM. R.Stimulus generalization along the dimension of angularity.Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 1965, 60, 59–63.
16.
PrehmJ. J.Concept learning in culturally disadvantaged children as a function of verbal pretraining.Exceptional Children, 1966, 32, 599–604.
17.
RossL. E.Learning research with the retarded. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation.Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 24–29.
18.
SmithM. D., & MeansJ. R.Effects of type of stimulus pretraining on discrimination learning in mentally retarded.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1961, 66, 259–265.
19.
WatsonL. S., ClevengerL. J., & HundziakM.Transfer of word recognition performance by brain-injured mentally retarded children. Paper presented at the convention of the Great Lakes Region American Association on Mental Deficiency, Columbus, Ohio, 1964.
