A framework for understanding educational exceptionality in terms of stimulus, response, and reinforcement is offered. Every educationally exceptional child is seen as having some measurable defect in one of 41 areas which represent points of interaction of receptive functioning, response mechanisms, and responsivity to reinforcement. The framework provides a guideline for assessment, for grouping for instruction, and for remedial techniques in terms of observable behavioral variables.
BarragaN.Increased visual behavior in low vision children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1964.
3.
BlackmanL.The dimensions of a science of special education.Mental Retardation, 1967, 5, 7–11.
4.
DunnL. M.Special education for the mildly retarded-is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 1968, 35, 5–22.
5.
EllisN. R.The stimulus trace and behavioral inadequacy. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 134–158.
6.
JohnsJ. A., & QuayH. C.The effect of social reward on verbal conditioning in psychopathic and neurotic military offenders.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1962, 26, 217–220.
7.
LevinG. R., & SimmonsJ. J.Response to food and praise by emotionally disturbed boys.Psychological Reports, 1962, 11, 539–546.
8.
MischclW.Theory and research on the antecedents of self-imposed delay of reward. In MaherB. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research.Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 85–132.
9.
PattersonG. R., JonesR., WhittierJ., & WrightM.A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1965, 2, 217–226.
10.
QuayH. C.Some basic considerations in the education of emotionally disturbed children.Exceptional Children, 1963, 30, 27–31.
11.
QuayH. C.Dimensions of problem behavior and educational programming. In GraubardP. S. (Ed.), Children Against Schools.New York: Follett, in press.
12.
QuayH. C., WerryJ. S., McQueenM. M., & SpragueR. L.Remediation of the conduct problem child in the special class setting.Exceptional Children, 1966, 3, 390–397.
13.
RossL. E., HetheringtonM., WrayN. P.Delay of reward and the learning of a size problem by normal and retarded children.Child Development, 1965, 36, 509–518.
14.
ScottK. G.Engineering attention: Some rules for the classroom.Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1966, 1, 125–129.
15.
StevensG. D.Taxonomy in special education for children with body disorders: The problem and a proposal.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 1962.
16.
TerrellG.Jr., DurkinK., & WiesleyM.Social class and the nature of the incentive in discrimination learning.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 59, 270–272.
17.
WitryolS. L., TyrrellD. J., & LowdenL. M.Development of incentive values in childhood.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1965, 72, 201–246.
18.
ZeamanD., & HouseB. J.The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 159–223.
19.
ZiglerE., & KanzerP.The effectiveness of two classes of verbal reinforcers on the performance of middle and lower class children.Journal of Personality, 1962, 30, 157–163.
