The extreme variability of behavior characterizing the neurologically impaired, or more recently, children with learning disabilities, demands the educator's attention to symptomatology rather than etiology. Diagnosticians must strengthen their attempts to recommend corrective remedial-education for these children rather than to serve as mere “classifiers” or intermediate “stop-gaps” between teachers and neurologists. Clinical educational techniques of proven value should be geared to the nature of the learning disability rather than to causative factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettC. D., EllisN. R., and PryerM. W.Learning in familial and brain-injured defectives. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1960, 64, 894–901.
2.
BeckH. S., and LamR. L.Use of the WISC in predicting organicity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1955, 11, 154–158.
3.
BensbergG. J.Jr.The relation of academic achievement of mental defectives to mental age, sex, institutionalization and etiology. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1953, 58, 327–330.
4.
BurnsR. C.Behavioral differences between brain-injured and brain-deficit children grouped according to neuropathological types. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1960. 65, 326–334.
5.
CapobiancoR. J.Quantitative and qualitative analyses of endogenous and exogenous boys on arithmetic achievement. Monograph of Society for Research in Child Development, 1956, 19, 101–141.
6.
CapobiancoR. J., and FunkRuth A.A comparative study of intellectual, neurological, and perceptual processes as related to reading achievement of exogenous and endogenous retarded children. New York: Syracuse University Research Institute, 1958.
7.
CapobiancoR. J., and MillerD. Y.Quantitative and qualitative analyses of exogenous and endogenous children in some reading processes. New York: Syracuse University Research Institute, 1958.
8.
GallagherJ. J.A comparison of brain-injured and non-brain-injured mentally retarded children on several psychological variables. Monograph of Society for Research in Child Development, 1957, 22, (2).
9.
GallagherJ. J.The tutoring of brain-injured mentally retarded children. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1960.
10.
KirkS. A., and McCarthyJ. J.The Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities—an approach to differential diagnosis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1961, 66, 399–412.
11.
MorrowR. S., and MarkJ. C.The correlation of intelligence and neurological findings on 22 patients autopsied for brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1955, 19, 283–289.
12.
NewlandT. E.Psychological assessment of exceptional children. In CruickshankW. (Editor), Psychology of exceptional children and youth (Second Edition). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.
13.
ReitanR. M.Certain differential effects of left and right cerebral lesions in human adults. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955, 48, 474–477.
14.
RiggsMargaret M., and RainMargaret E.A classification system for the mentally retarded. Training School Bulletin, 1952, 49, 151–168.
15.
SieversDorothy L., and RosenbergC. M.The differential language facility test and electroencephalograms of brain-injured mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1960, 65, 46–50.
16.
StraussA. A., and LehtinenLaura E.Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child. New York: Grune and Stratton, Inc., 1947.
17.
TaterkaJ. H., and KatzJ.Study of correlations between electroencephalographic and psychological patterns in emotionally disturbed children. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1955, 22, 62–72.
18.
WechslerD.The measurement of adult intelligence. (Third Edition) Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, Inc., 1944.