An Evaluation of Group Hearing Test Methods

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Causey

George D.

“A Comparative Analysis of Group and Individual Hearing Test Results.” Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1954.

2. Curby

E. Thayer

. “Reliability of the Ear-Choice Technique in Threshold Audiometry.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, Vol. 62, 1953, p. 156– 60.

3. Curry

E. Thayer

. “An Analysis of Hearing Loss Patterns in a Rural Illinois School System.” Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Monthly, Vol. 29, 1950, p. 357– 59.

4. Dicarlo

Louis M.

and Gardner

Eric F.

“The Efficiency of the Massachusetts Pure Tone Screening Test as Adapted for a University Testing Program.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 18, 1953, p. 175– 82.

5. Harris

J. Donald

. “Group Audiometry.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 17, 1947., p. 73– 76.

6. Johnson

Kenneth O.

“The Relative Efficiency of the Western Electric 4CA Phonograph and Massachusetts Pure Tone Group Hearing Tests.” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1952.

7. Nacel

Robert F.

Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Illinois, 1956.

8. Newby

Hayes A.

“Evaluating the Efficiency of Group Screening Tests of Hearing.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Vol. 13, 1948, p. 236– 40.

9. Webster

John C.

“A Recorded Warble Tone Audiometer Test Suitable for Group Administration over Loud Speakers.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Vol. 17, 1952, p. 213– 23.

10.

10. Yankauer

ALFRED

, Geyer

Margaret C.

, and Chase

Helen C.

“Comparative Evaluation of Three Screening Methods for Detection of Hearing Loss in School Children.” American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 44, 1954, p. 77– 82.