To ensure children with disabilities (CWD) have a successful transition to kindergarten, teachers have been encouraged to use high-intensity, or individualized, transition practices. Yet, there exists little research regarding principals’ perceptions of transition practice use for CWD. The purpose of this explanatory sequential mixed methods study was to better understand how principals’ perceptions are related to the reported use of transition practices by teachers to support CWD and their families, and their perceived importance and feasibility. A questionnaire designed for this study was used to understand what 150 principals from one midwestern U.S. state report about teachers’ use of kindergarten transition practices to support CWD, and their perceptions of transition practices. Next, interviews were conducted with 14 principals to further explain findings from the initial phase, using a purposeful sample and interview protocol developed using findings from the completed questionnaires. According to findings, principals perceived preschool teachers as having an essential role in the transition process and as using a higher number of transition practices when compared to those used by kindergarten teachers. Principals in this study perceived proximity of preschool and kindergarten classrooms as one contributing factor to the use of transition practices. Lastly, principals who reported teachers’ use of a higher number of overall and high-intensity transition practices were able to describe multiple benefits of their use. While these findings indicate a potential need for professional development to support principals’ understanding of best practices as they relate to kindergarten transition for CWD, further investigation using statistical methods of analysis and comparison to teacher perceptions is suggested.
BaysD. A.CrockettJ. B. (2007). Investigating instructional leadership for special education. Exceptionality, 15(3), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830701503495
5.
BiemerP. P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058
6.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.
7.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001440290507100205
BrothersonM. J.SheriffG.MilburnP.SchertzM. (2001). Elementary school principals and their needs and issues for inclusive early childhood programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140102100103
10.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practices for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100209
11.
Conn-PowersM. C.Ross-AllenJ.HolburnS. (1990). Transition of young children into the elementary education mainstream. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9(4), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149000900409
12.
CorrC.SnodgrassM. R.GreeneJ. C.MeadanH.SantosR. M. (2020). Mixed methods in early childhood special education research: Purposes, challenges, and guidance. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119873096
13.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd Ed.). Sage.
14.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
15.
CruzeiroP. A.MorganR. L. (2006). The rural principal’s role with consideration for special education. Education, 126(3), 569–579.
16.
DaaneC. J.Beirne-SmithM.LathamD. (2000). Administrators’ and teaches’ perceptions of the collaborative efforts of inclusion in the elementary grades. Education, 121(2), 331–339.
17.
DaleyT. C.MunkT.CarlsonE. (2011). A national study of kindergarten transition practices for children with disabilities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(4), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.001
FàbreguesS.Molina-AzorínJ. F. (2017). Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 51(6), 2847–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4
22.
FanW.YanZ. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015
23.
ForestE. J.HornerR. H.Lewis-PalmerT.ToddA. W. (2004). Transitions for young children with autism from preschool to kindergarten. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10983007040060020501
24.
FrickW. C.FairclothS. C.LittleK. S. (2012). Responding to the collective and individual “best interests of students”: Revisiting the tension between administrative practice and ethical imperatives in special education leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 207–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12463230
25.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202
26.
GillS.WintersD.FriedmanD. S. (2006). Educators’ views of pre-kindergarten and kindergarten readiness and transition practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Fciec.2006.7.3.213
27.
GoodenC.RousB. (2018). Effective transitions to kindergarten for children with disabilities. In MashburnA. J.LoCasale-CrouchJ.PearsK. C. (Eds.), Kindergarten transition and readiness (pp. 141–162). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90200-5
28.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. John Wiley & Sons.
29.
HorrocksJ. L.WhiteG.RobertsL. (2008). Principals’ attitudes regarding inclusion of children with autism in Pennsylvania public schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1462–1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0522-x
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400. (2004).
32.
IvankovaN. V.StickS. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(93), 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
33.
JenkinsA. A.YoshimuraJ. (2010). Not another inservice! meeting the special education professional development needs of elementary general educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(5), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200504
34.
JiangH.JusticeL.PurtellK. M.LinT.LoganJ. (2021). Prevalence and prediction of kindergarten-transition difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.10.006
35.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2010). Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00151.x
36.
LekoM. M.HitchcockJ. H.LoveH. R.HouchinsD. E.ConroyM. A. (2023). Quality indicators for mixed-methods research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141031
37.
LynchJ. M. (2016). Effective instruction for students with disabilities: Perceptions of rural middle school principals. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500404
38.
McCruddenM. T.McTigueE. M. (2018). Implementing integration in an explanatory sequential mixed methods study of belief bias about climate change with high school students. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818762576
39.
McIntyreL. L.EckertT. L.FieseB. H.ReedF. D.WildengerL. K. (2010). Family concerns surrounding kindergarten transition: A comparison of students in special and general education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0416-y
MovahedazarhoulighS.BanerjeeR.LucknerJ. (2021). An examination of current leadership practices in early childhood and early childhood special education: A mixed methods study. Early Education and Development, 33(4), 700–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2021.1909937
42.
MyersC. T. (2008). Descriptive study of occupational therapists’ participation in early childhood transitions. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 62(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.2.212
43.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). McGraw-Hill.
44.
OddenA. R.PicusL. O.GoetzM. E. (2010). A 50-state strategy to achieve school finance adequacy. Educational Policy, 24(4), 628–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809335107
45.
PiantaR. C.CoxM. J.TaylorL.EarlyD. (1999). Kindergarten teachers’ practices related to the transition to school: Results of a national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/461944
46.
PonterottoJ. G.RuckdeschelD. E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014
47.
PraisnerC. L. (2003). Attitudes of elementary school principals toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290306900201
48.
PurtellK. M.ValauriA.Rhoad-DrogalisA.JiangH.JusticeL. M.LinT.LoganJ. A. R. (2020). Understanding policies and practices that support successful transitions to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52(B), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.09.003
49.
QuinteroN.McIntyreL. L. (2011). Kindergarten transition preparation: A comparison of teacher and parent practices for children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0427-8
50.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
51.
ReyesV.BogumilE.WelchL. E. (2021). The living codebook: Documenting the process of qualitative data analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120986185
52.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.PiantaR. C. (2000). An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: A theoretical framework to guide empirical research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(5), 491–511. doi/10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00051-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00051-4
53.
RobertsC. A.RupparA. L.OlsonA. J. (2018). Perceptions matter: Administrators’ vision of instruction for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917743931
54.
RobertsM. B.GuerraF. (2017). Principals’ perceptions of needs in Hispanic special education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715616679
55.
RousB. (2008). Recommended transition practices for young children and families: Results from a national validation survey (Technical Report No.3). University of Kentucky, Human Development Institute, National Early Childhood Transition Center.
56.
RousB.GoodenC.LiZ. (2019). Nationally validated transition practices: Implications for children with disabilities, families, and providers. In presentation at the Division for Early Childhood's Annual International Conference on Young Children with Special Needs and Their Families, Dallas, TX.
57.
RousB.GoodenC.LiZ. (2021). Validation of transition practices for young children and families: Results from a national survey. Manuscript in-preparation.
58.
RousB.HallamR.HarbinG.McCormickK.JungL. (2007a). The transition process for young children with disabilities: A conceptual framework. Infants and Young Children, 20(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000264481.27947.5f
59.
RousB.MeyersC.StricklinS. (2007b). Strategies for supporting transitions of young children with special needs and their families. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F105381510703000102
60.
SalisburyC. L. (2006). Principals’ perspectives on inclusive elementary schools. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.31.1.70
61.
SalisburyC. L.McGregorG. (2002). The administrative climate and context of inclusive elementary schools. Exceptional Children, 68(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206800207
62.
SandsM. M.MeadanH. (2023). Transition to kindergarten for children with disabilities: Parent and kindergarten teacher perceptions and experiences. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 43(4), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214221146748
63.
SunA. Q.XinJ. F. (2020). School principals’ opinions about special education services. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1681354
64.
TavakolM.DennickR. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
65.
TeddlieC.YuF. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
66.
TrainorA. A.GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100
United States Department of Education. (2009). Early school transitions and the social behavior of children with disabilities: Selected findings from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pdf/20093016.pdf.
WaldronN. L.McLeskeyJ.ReddL. (2011). Setting the direction: The role of the principal in developing an effective, inclusive school. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(2), 51–60.
71.
WelchonsL. W.McIntyreL. L. (2015). The transition to kindergarten for children with and without disabilities: An investigation of parent and teacher concerns and involvement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0271121414523141
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
