We investigate the efficacy of a reading intervention integrated with Engaged Learners, a program that applies behavioral and cognitive principles to increase student behavioral attention and reduce distractions during instruction. Using a three-arm randomized controlled trial, we randomized 159 Grade 3–5 students with co-occurring reading and behavioral attention challenges to a researcher-implemented small group reading intervention with Engaged Learners (READ + ENGAGE), an identical researcher-implemented reading intervention without Engaged Learners (READ), or a Business-as-Usual (BaU) condition. The READ + ENGAGE condition students demonstrated statistically significant greater behavioral attention according to direct observations and interventionist reports than READ condition students. The pattern of reading effect sizes contrasting the conditions suggests that the READ + ENGAGE and READ conditions were associated with higher performance on reading outcomes than the BaU condition and students in the READ condition significantly outperformed the BaU condition on measures of word reading, fluency and reading comprehension, and mid-transfer vocabulary and reading comprehension. We also explored whether integrating the Engaged Learners program in a reading intervention would be associated with improved reading outcomes by contrasting the READ + ENGAGE to the READ condition; however, the findings did not support this hypothesis. Future research could examine the effects of systematically fading the Engaged Learner supports over time and implementing the intervention over a longer duration. These findings demonstrate that an integrated intervention can be implemented with minimal training and coaching, increasing behavioral attention to reading instruction during small-group instruction for upper elementary students with co-occurring reading and behavioral attention challenges.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823
2.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
3.
CassarA. G.JangE. E. (2010). Investigating the effects of a game-based approach in teaching word recognition and spelling to students with Reading disabilities and attention deficits. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404151003796516
4.
ChoE.Dahl-LeonardK.KehoeK.CapinP.HallC.SolariE. (2023). Motivational practices in reading interventions for students with or at risk for dyslexia: Literature synthesis and meta-analysis. Topics in Language Disorders, 43(2), 119–145.
5.
CirinoP. T.FuchsL. S.EliasJ. T.PowellS. R.SchumacherR. F. (2015). Cognitive and mathematical profiles for different forms of learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413494239
6.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
7.
DentonC. A.TammL.SchatschneiderC.EpsteinJ. N. (2020). The effects of ADHD treatment and Reading intervention on the fluency and comprehension of children with ADHD and word Reading difficulties: A randomized clinical trial. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1640704
8.
DignathC.BuettnerG.LangfeldtH. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
9.
DignathC.VeenmanM. V. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
10.
DiPernaJ.C.ElliottS. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the mini-series. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086156
11.
DittmanC. K. (2016). Associations between inattention, hyperactivity and pre-reading skills before and after formal reading instruction begins. Reading and Writing, 29(9), 1771–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9652-x
12.
DoneganR. E.WanzekJ. (2021). Effects of Reading interventions implemented for upper elementary struggling readers: A look at recent research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(8), 1943–1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10123-y
13.
DuPaulG. J.GormleyM. J.Daffner-DemingM. (2022). School-based interventions for elementary school students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 31(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2021.08.003
14.
DuPaulG. J.WeyandtL. L.JanusisG. M. (2011). ADHD In the classroom: Effective intervention strategies. Theory Into Practice, 50(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534935
15.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020). Behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919843075
16.
EvansS. W.OwensJ. S.BunfordN. (2014). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 527–551. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.850700.
17.
FabianoG. A.LupasK.MerrillB. M.SchatzN. K.PiscitelloJ.RobertsonE. L.Pelham JrW. E. (2024). Reconceptualizing the approach to supporting students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 104, Article 101309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101309
18.
FabianoG. A.SchatzN. K.AloeA. M.Pelham JrW. E.SmythA. C.ZhaoX.CoxeS. (2021). Comprehensive meta-analysis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder psychosocial treatments investigated within between group studies. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 718–760. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.3102/00346543211025092
19.
FuchsD.HendricksE.WalshM. E.FuchsL. S.GilbertJ. K.Zhang TracyW.Patton IIIS.Davis-PerkinsN.KimW.EllemanA. M.PengP. (2018). Evaluating a multidimensional Reading comprehension program and reconsidering the lowly reputation of tests of near-transfer. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12162
20.
GiordaniP.FerraroM. B.MartellaF. (2020). Issues in gaussian model-based clustering. In An introduction to clustering with R (pp. 291–340). Springer Singapore.
21.
Gwet. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: How to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. STATAXIS Publishing Company.
HendricksE. L.FuchsD. (2020). Are individual differences in response to intervention influenced by the methods and measures used to define response? Implications for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 428–443. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0022219420920379
24.
KernL.WehbyJ. H. (2014). Using data to intensify behavioral interventions for individual students. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522970
25.
KuleszP.RobertsG. J.FrancisJ. D.CirinoP.WalczakM.VaughnS. (2024). Latent profiles as a predictor of response to instruction for students with Reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000832
26.
LakesK. D.SwansonJ. M.RiggsM. (2012). The reliability and validity of the English and spanish strengths and weaknesses of ADHD and normal behavior rating scales in a preschool sample: Continuum measures of hyperactivity and inattention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(6), 510–516. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1087054711413550
27.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666
LonerganA.DoyleC.CassidyC.MacSweeney MahonS.RocheR. A.BoranL.BramhamJ. (2019). A meta-analysis of executive functioning in dyslexia with consideration of the impact of comorbid ADHD. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(7), 725–749. http//doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1669609
30.
LopezM. J.GutmanR. (2017). Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: A review and new ideas. Statistical Science, 32(3), 432–454. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26408300
31.
MacdonaldK. T.BarnesM. A.MiciakJ.RobertsG.HalversonK. K.VaughnS.CirinoP. T. (2021). Sustained attention and behavioral ratings of attention in struggling readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(5), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1826950
McGrathL. M.PenningtonB. F.ShanahanM. A.Santerre-LemmonL. E.BarnardH. D.WillcuttE. G.DeFriesJ. C.OlsonR. K. (2011). A multiple deficit model of Reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Searching for shared cognitive deficits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(5), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02346.x
34.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.TufisP. A.SperlingR. A. (2008). Are Reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408321123
35.
NattinoG.LuB.ShiJ.LemeshowS.XiangH. (2021). Triplet matching for estimating causal effects with three treatment arms: A comparative study of mortality by trauma center level. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(533), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1737078
36.
PengP.ZhangZ.WangW.LeeK.WangT.WangC.LuoJ.LinJ. (2022). A meta-analytic review of cognition and Reading difficulties: Individual differences, moderation, and language mediation mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 148(3-4), 227–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000361
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2015). Behavior assessment system for children–Third Edition (BASC-3). Pearson.
39.
RobertsG. J.ChoE.GarwoodJ. D.GobleG. H.RobertsonT.HodgesA. (2020). Reading interventions for students with Reading and behavioral difficulties: A meta-analysis and evaluation of co-occurring difficulties. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 17–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09485-1
40.
SayalK.WashbrookE.PropperC. (2015). Childhood behavior problems and academic outcomes in adolescence: Longitudinal population-based study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(5), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.02.007
41.
SextonC. C.GelhornH. L.BellJ. A.ClassiP. M. (2012). The co-occurrence of Reading disorder and ADHD: Epidemiology, treatment, psychosocial impact, and economic burden. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 538–564. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0022219411407772
42.
SutherlandK. S.ConroyM. A.McLeodB. D.KunemundR.McKnightK. (2019). Common practice elements for improving social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes of young elementary school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342661878400
43.
SwansonJ. M.SchuckS.PorterM. M.CarlsonC.HartmanC. A.SergeantJ. A.ClevengerW.WasdellM.McClearyR.LakesK.WigalT.WigalT. (2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10(1), 51–70. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618695/
TammL.DentonC. A.EpsteinJ. N.SchatschneiderC.TaylorH.ArnoldL. E., et al. (2017). Comparing treatments for children with ADHD and word Reading difficulties: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(5), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000170
46.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (2012). Test of word Reading efficiency. Pro-Ed.
47.
VaughnS.RobertsG. J.MiciakJ.TaylorP. M.FletcherJ. M. (2019). Efficacy of a word- and text-based intervention for students with significant Reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775113
VygotskyL S (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
50.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.PearsonN. A. (2010). TOSREC: Test of sentence Reading efficiency and comprehension. Pro-Ed.
51.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, Version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). This report is available on the What Works Clearinghouse website at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.
52.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
53.
WillcuttE. G.PenningtonF. B. (2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with Reading disability. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(8), 1039–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00691
54.
WillcuttE. G.PetrillS. A. (2023). Comorbidity between Reading disability and ADHD in a community sample: Implications for academic, social, and neuropsychological functioning. Mind, Brain and Education: The Official Journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 17(4), 338. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12393
55.
WillcuttE. G.PetrillS. A.WuS.BoadaR.DeFriesJ. C.OlsonR. K.PenningtonB. F. (2013). Comorbidity between Reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(6), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413477476
56.
ZengS.BennerG. J.SilvaR. M. (2016). Effects of a summer learning program for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0026
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
