The Efficacy of Integrating Engaged Learners Into Small Group Reading Instruction on Reading and Attention Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

We investigate the efficacy of a reading intervention integrated with Engaged Learners, a program that applies behavioral and cognitive principles to increase student behavioral attention and reduce distractions during instruction. Using a three-arm randomized controlled trial, we randomized 159 Grade 3–5 students with co-occurring reading and behavioral attention challenges to a researcher-implemented small group reading intervention with Engaged Learners (READ + ENGAGE), an identical researcher-implemented reading intervention without Engaged Learners (READ), or a Business-as-Usual (BaU) condition. The READ + ENGAGE condition students demonstrated statistically significant greater behavioral attention according to direct observations and interventionist reports than READ condition students. The pattern of reading effect sizes contrasting the conditions suggests that the READ + ENGAGE and READ conditions were associated with higher performance on reading outcomes than the BaU condition and students in the READ condition significantly outperformed the BaU condition on measures of word reading, fluency and reading comprehension, and mid-transfer vocabulary and reading comprehension. We also explored whether integrating the Engaged Learners program in a reading intervention would be associated with improved reading outcomes by contrasting the READ + ENGAGE to the READ condition; however, the findings did not support this hypothesis. Future research could examine the effects of systematically fading the Engaged Learner supports over time and implementing the intervention over a longer duration. These findings demonstrate that an integrated intervention can be implemented with minimal training and coaching, increasing behavioral attention to reading instruction during small-group instruction for upper elementary students with co-occurring reading and behavioral attention challenges.

Keywords

reading attention behavioral group experimental design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823

Benjamini

Hochberg

(1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

Cassar

A. G.

Jang

E. E.

(2010). Investigating the effects of a game-based approach in teaching word recognition and spelling to students with Reading disabilities and attention deficits. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404151003796516

Cho

Dahl-Leonard

Kehoe

Capin

Hall

Solari

(2023). Motivational practices in reading interventions for students with or at risk for dyslexia: Literature synthesis and meta-analysis. Topics in Language Disorders, 43(2), 119–145.

Cirino

P. T.

Fuchs

L. S.

Elias

J. T.

Powell

S. R.

Schumacher

R. F.

(2015). Cognitive and mathematical profiles for different forms of learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413494239

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.

Denton

C. A.

Tamm

Schatschneider

Epstein

J. N.

(2020). The effects of ADHD treatment and Reading intervention on the fluency and comprehension of children with ADHD and word Reading difficulties: A randomized clinical trial. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1640704

Dignath

Buettner

Langfeldt

H. P.

(2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003

Dignath

Veenman

M. V.

(2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

10.

DiPerna

J.C.

Elliott

S. N.

(2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the mini-series. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086156

11.

Dittman

C. K.

(2016). Associations between inattention, hyperactivity and pre-reading skills before and after formal reading instruction begins. Reading and Writing, 29(9), 1771–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9652-x

12.

Donegan

R. E.

Wanzek

(2021). Effects of Reading interventions implemented for upper elementary struggling readers: A look at recent research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(8), 1943–1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10123-y

13.

DuPaul

G. J.

Gormley

M. J.

Daffner-Deming

(2022). School-based interventions for elementary school students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 31(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2021.08.003

14.

DuPaul

G. J.

Weyandt

L. L.

Janusis

G. M.

(2011). ADHD In the classroom: Effective intervention strategies. Theory Into Practice, 50(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534935

15.

Ennis

R. P.

Royer

D. J.

Lane

K. L.

Dunlap

K. D.

(2020). Behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919843075

16.

Evans

S. W.

Owens

J. S.

Bunford

(2014). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 527–551. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.850700.

17.

Fabiano

G. A.

Lupas

Merrill

B. M.

Schatz

N. K.

Piscitello

Robertson

E. L.

Pelham Jr

W. E.

(2024). Reconceptualizing the approach to supporting students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 104, Article 101309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101309

18.

Fabiano

G. A.

Schatz

N. K.

Aloe

A. M.

Pelham Jr

W. E.

Smyth

A. C.

Zhao

Coxe

(2021). Comprehensive meta-analysis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder psychosocial treatments investigated within between group studies. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 718–760. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.3102/00346543211025092

19.

Fuchs

Hendricks

Walsh

M. E.

Fuchs

L. S.

Gilbert

J. K.

Zhang Tracy

Patton III

Davis-Perkins

Kim

Elleman

A. M.

Peng

(2018). Evaluating a multidimensional Reading comprehension program and reconsidering the lowly reputation of tests of near-transfer. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12162

20.

Giordani

Ferraro

M. B.

Martella

(2020). Issues in gaussian model-based clustering. In An introduction to clustering with R (pp. 291–340). Springer Singapore.

21.

Gwet. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: How to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. STATAXIS Publishing Company.

22.

Hattie

Timperley

(2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

23.

Hendricks

E. L.

Fuchs

(2020). Are individual differences in response to intervention influenced by the methods and measures used to define response? Implications for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 428–443. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0022219420920379

24.

Kern

Wehby

J. H.

(2014). Using data to intensify behavioral interventions for individual students. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522970

25.

Kulesz

Roberts

G. J.

Francis

J. D.

Cirino

Walczak

Vaughn

(2024). Latent profiles as a predictor of response to instruction for students with Reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000832

26.

Lakes

K. D.

Swanson

J. M.

Riggs

(2012). The reliability and validity of the English and spanish strengths and weaknesses of ADHD and normal behavior rating scales in a preschool sample: Continuum measures of hyperactivity and inattention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(6), 510–516. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1087054711413550

27.

Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666

28.

Lenth

R. V.

Buerkner

Herve

Love

Riebl

Singmann

(2020). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (Version 1.5.3). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.

29.

Lonergan

Doyle

Cassidy

MacSweeney Mahon

Roche

R. A.

Boran

Bramham

(2019). A meta-analysis of executive functioning in dyslexia with consideration of the impact of comorbid ADHD. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(7), 725–749. http//doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1669609

30.

Lopez

M. J.

Gutman

(2017). Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: A review and new ideas. Statistical Science, 32(3), 432–454. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26408300

31.

Macdonald

K. T.

Barnes

M. A.

Miciak

Roberts

Halverson

K. K.

Vaughn

Cirino

P. T.

(2021). Sustained attention and behavioral ratings of attention in struggling readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(5), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1826950

32.

MacGinitie

W. H.

MacGinitie

R. K.

Maria

Dreyer

L. G.

Hughes

K. E.

(2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed.). Riverside.

33.

McGrath

L. M.

Pennington

B. F.

Shanahan

M. A.

Santerre-Lemmon

L. E.

Barnard

H. D.

Willcutt

E. G.

DeFries

J. C.

Olson

R. K.

(2011). A multiple deficit model of Reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Searching for shared cognitive deficits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(5), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02346.x

34.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Tufis

P. A.

Sperling

R. A.

(2008). Are Reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408321123

35.

Nattino

Shi

Lemeshow

Xiang

(2021). Triplet matching for estimating causal effects with three treatment arms: A comparative study of mortality by trauma center level. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(533), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1737078

36.

Peng

Zhang

Wang

Lee

Wang

Luo

Lin

(2022). A meta-analytic review of cognition and Reading difficulties: Individual differences, moderation, and language mediation mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 148(3-4), 227–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000361

37.

Pennington

B. F.

(2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.008

38.

Reynolds

C. R.

Kamphaus

R. W.

(2015). Behavior assessment system for children–Third Edition (BASC-3). Pearson.

39.

Roberts

G. J.

Cho

Garwood

J. D.

Goble

G. H.

Robertson

Hodges

(2020). Reading interventions for students with Reading and behavioral difficulties: A meta-analysis and evaluation of co-occurring difficulties. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 17–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09485-1

40.

Sayal

Washbrook

Propper

(2015). Childhood behavior problems and academic outcomes in adolescence: Longitudinal population-based study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(5), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.02.007

41.

Sexton

C. C.

Gelhorn

H. L.

Bell

J. A.

Classi

P. M.

(2012). The co-occurrence of Reading disorder and ADHD: Epidemiology, treatment, psychosocial impact, and economic burden. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 538–564. https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0022219411407772

42.

Sutherland

K. S.

Conroy

M. A.

McLeod

B. D.

Kunemund

McKnight

(2019). Common practice elements for improving social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes of young elementary school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342661878400

43.

Swanson

J. M.

Schuck

Porter

M. M.

Carlson

Hartman

C. A.

Sergeant

J. A.

Clevenger

Wasdell

McCleary

Lakes

Wigal

(2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10(1), 51–70. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618695/

44.

Sweller

(1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0364-0213(88)90023-7

45.

Tamm

Denton

C. A.

Epstein

J. N.

Schatschneider

Taylor

Arnold

L. E.

, et al. (2017). Comparing treatments for children with ADHD and word Reading difficulties: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(5), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000170

46.

Torgesen

J. K.

Wagner

R. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

(2012). Test of word Reading efficiency. Pro-Ed.

47.

Vaughn

Roberts

G. J.

Miciak

Taylor

P. M.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2019). Efficacy of a word- and text-based intervention for students with significant Reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775113

48.

Voyager Sopris Learning. (2022). Passport. Voyager Sopris Learning.

49.

Vygotsky

L S

(1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.

50.

Wagner

R. K.

Torgesen

J. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

Pearson

N. A.

(2010). TOSREC: Test of sentence Reading efficiency and comprehension. Pro-Ed.

51.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, Version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). This report is available on the What Works Clearinghouse website at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.

52.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

53.

Willcutt

E. G.

Pennington

F. B.

(2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with Reading disability. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(8), 1039–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00691

54.

Willcutt

E. G.

Petrill

S. A.

(2023). Comorbidity between Reading disability and ADHD in a community sample: Implications for academic, social, and neuropsychological functioning. Mind, Brain and Education: The Official Journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 17(4), 338. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12393

55.

Willcutt

E. G.

Petrill

S. A.

Boada

DeFries

J. C.

Olson

R. K.

Pennington

B. F.

(2013). Comorbidity between Reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(6), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413477476

56.

Zeng

Benner

G. J.

Silva

R. M.

(2016). Effects of a summer learning program for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0026

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.07 MB

0.00 MB