Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Qualitative research (QR) has gained visibility and acceptance in the field of special education due to early efforts to identify quality indicators focused on technical and methodological aspects of QR. Whereas these indicators focused on credibility and trustworthiness of data, this article articulates additional QR quality indicators to enhance the value and power of researcher reflexivity as a means to expand the capacity of purpose- and equity-driven special education research. First, the need for reflexivity criteria is addressed. Next, reflexivity criteria are operationalized in key questions that engage researchers in self-reflection: (a) Why do QR? (b) By whom, for whom, and with whom is QR being conducted? and (c) Who is affected by the benefits and costs of QR? These questions encourage researchers to grapple with the complexity of experiences, outcomes, and structures associated with special education and ultimately advance more equitable policy and practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annamma

S. A.

(2014). Disabling juvenile justice: Engaging the stories of incarcerated young women of color with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514526785

Annamma

A. (2015). Whiteness as property: Innocence and ability in teacher education. Urban Review, 47(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0293-6

Annamma

S. A.

Boelé

A. L.

Moore

B. A.

Klingner

(2013). Challenging the ideology of normal in schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(12), 1278–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.802379

Annamma

S. A.

Jackson

D. D.

Morrison

(2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837

Artiles

A. J.

(1998). The dilemma of difference: Enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context. The Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200105

Artiles

A. J.

(2019). Fourteenth annual Brown lecture in education research: Re-envisioning equity research. Disability identification disparities as a case in point. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19871949

Arzubiaga

A. E.

Artiles

A. J.

King

K. A.

Harris-Murri

(2008). Beyond research on cultural minorities: Challenges and implications of research as situated cultural practice. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400303

Banks

(2014). Barrier and supports to college transition: Case studies of African-American students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513512209

Banks

(2017). “These people are never going to stop labeling me”: Educational experiences of African American male students labeled with learning disabilities. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1250235

10.

Banks

(2018). Invisible man: Examining the intersectionality of disability, race, and gender in an urban community. Disability & Society, 33(6), 894–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1456912

11.

Berliner

D. C.

(2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018

12.

Bishop

(2008). Freeing ourselves from neocolonial domination in research: A Kauppapa Māori approach to creating knowledge. In N. K.

Denzin

Y. S.

Lincoln

(Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 109–138). Sage.

13.

Brantlinger

E. A.

Jimenez

R. T.

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

14.

Brayboy

B. M. J.

Deyhle

(2000). Insider-outsider: Researchers in American Indian communities. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_7

15.

Butler

(2011). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

16.

Chapman

(2011). Resonance, intersectionality, and reflexivity in critical pedagogy (and research methodology). Social Work Education, 30(7), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.520120

17.

Christians

C. G.

(2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K.

Denzin

Y. S.

Lincoln

(Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Sage.

18.

Cole

(2010). What’s culture got to do with it? Educational research as a necessarily interdisciplinary enterprise. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10380247

19.

Connor

Cavendish

González

Jean-Pierre

(2019). Is a bridge even possible over troubled waters? The field of special education negates the overrepresentation of minority students. A discrit analysis. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(6), 723–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1599343

20.

Connor

D. J.

(2008). Urban narratives: Portraits in progress, life at the intersections of learning disability, race and class. Peter Lang.

21.

Cormier

C. J.

Scott

L. A.

Powell

Hall

(2022). Locked in glass classrooms: Black male special education teachers socialized as everything but educators. Teacher Education & Special Education, 45(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211061038

22.

Craft

Howley

(2018). African American students’ experiences in special education programs. Teachers College Record, 120(10), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812001001

23.

Crenshaw

(1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

24.

Crenshaw

K. W.

Harris

L. C.

Martinez Hosang

Lipsitz

(2019). Seeing race again. University of California Press.

25.

Cruz

R. A.

Rodl

J. E.

(2018). An integrative synthesis of literature on disproportionality in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 52(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918758707

26.

Dávila

(2015). Critical race theory, disability microaggressions and Latina/o student experiences in special education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.885422

27.

Denzin

N. K.

(2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In N. K.

Denzin

Y. S.

Lincoln

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed, pp. 933–958). Sage.

28.

Esposito

Evans-Winters

(2022). Introduction to intersectional qualitative research. Sage.

29.

Ferri

Connor

(2009). “I was the special ed girl”: (En)gendering disability from the standpoint of urban working-class young women of color. Journal of Gender and Education, 22(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802612688

30.

Fine

(1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K.

Denzin

Y. S.

Lincoln

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70–82). Sage.

31.

Forber-Pratt

A. J.

Lyew

Mueller

Samples

(2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134

32.

Giroux

H. A.

(2001). Cultural studies as performative politics. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 1(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860100100102

33.

González

Bertrand

Salinas

(2019). Pursuing inclusive schools: The case of youth researchers of color expanding a new vision. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 19(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.5555/2158-396X.19.1.4

34.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

Rogoff

(2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019

35.

Harry

Klingner

J. K.

(2014). Why are so many minority students in special education? (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

36.

Harvey

Wennerstrom

E. K.

(2021). Perceptions of parents of youth with disabilities toward school-based parent engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214211005853

37.

Hattery

A. J.

Smith

Magnuson

Monterrosa

Kafonek

Shaw

Davidson Mhonde

Kanewske

L. C.

(2022). Diversity, equity, and inclusion in research teams: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Race and Justice, 12(3), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687221087373

38.

Hernández-Saca

D. I.

(2020). My learning dis/ability and disability studies in education activism. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 31(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2019.1800935

39.

Holmes

A. G. D.

(2020). Researcher positionality: A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research. A new researcher guide. International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232

40.

Hostetler, K. (2005). What is “good” education research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16–21.

41.

Jackson

A. Y.

Mazzei

L. A.

(2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry. Routledge.

42.

Jurkowski

J. M.

(2008). Photovoice as participatory action research tool for engaging people with intellectual disabilities in research and program development. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2008)46[1:PAPART]2.0.CO;2

43.

Kangas

S. E. N.

(2020). Counternarratives of English learners with disabilities. Bilingual Research Journal, 43(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2020.1807424

44.

Keefe

E. B.

Moore

V. M.

Duff

F. R.

Fisher

(2006). Listening to the experts: Students with disabilities speak out. Brookes.

45.

Klingner

J. K.

Harry

(2006). The special education referral and decision-making process for English language learners: Child study team meetings and placement conferences. Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2247–2281. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9620.2006.00781.x

46.

Lather

(2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839050045014

47.

Lauterbach

A. A.

Bettini

Mathews

H. M.

Rossetti

Hughes

O. C.

(2022). Beyond exploratory: How varied qualitative methodologies can inform and advance the field of special education. In W. J.

Therrien

D. L.

Lee

D. M.

Maggin

(Eds.), Special education handbook: Methods, design, and analysis in special education research (pp. 171–186). Routledge.

48.

Leko

M. M.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2021). Qualitative methods in special education research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12268

49.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Berkeley

McDuffie

K. A.

Graff

Marshak

Conners

N. A.

Diamond

C. M.

Simpkins

Bowdey

F. R.

Fulcher

Scruggs

T. E.

Cuenca-Sanchez

(2009). What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907600105

50.

Mercer

(2007). The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980601094651

51.

Milner

H. R.,

IV . (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471

52.

Milner

H. R.,

IV Howard

T. C.

(2013). Counter-narrative as method: Race, policy and research for teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 536–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.817772

53.

Mingus

(2011, August 2). Moving toward the ugly: A politic beyond desirability. Leaving Evidence . https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/08/22/moving-toward-the-ugly-a-politic-beyond-desirability

54.

Morgan

P. L.

Farkas

Hillemeier

M. M.

Mattison

Maczuga

Cook

(2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15591157

55.

Mueller

(2019). Adolescent understandings of disability labels and social stigma in school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576940

56.

Mueller

C. O.

(2021). “I didn’t know people with disabilities could grow up to be adults”: Disability history, curriculum, and identity in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/D10.1177/0888406421996069

57.

Pacheco

(2010). Performativity in the bilingual classroom: The plight of English learners in the current reform context. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01068.x

58.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

59.

Pillow

(2003). Confession, catharsis or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635

60.

Pugach

M. C.

(2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700401

61.

Romano

Trainor

A. A.

Newman

(2023). Triad transition planning for students receiving special education and English learner services, families, and teachers. Career Development & Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221143514

62.

Ruppar

Bal

Gonzalez

Love

McCabe

(2018). Collaborative research: A new paradigm for systemic change in inclusive education for students with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 778–778. http://www.internationalsped.com/ijse/issue/view/26/23

63.

Skelton

S. M.

(2019). Situating my positionality as a Black woman with a dis/ability in the provision of equity-focused technical assistance: A personal reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576942

64.

Skiba

R. J.

Artiles

Kozleski

E. B.

Losen

D. J.

Harry

(2016). Risks and consequences of oversimplifying educational inequities: A response to Morgan et al. (2015). Educational Researcher, 45(3), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16644606

65.

Stronach

Garratt

Pearce

Piper

(2007). Reflexivity, the picturing of selves, the forging of method. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406295476

66.

(2009). Introduction. In G.

Alonso

N. S.

Anderson

Theoharis

(Eds.), Our schools suck: Students talk back to a segregated nation on the failures of urban education (pp. 1–30). New York University Press.

67.

Tachine

Nicolazzo

(2022). Weaving an otherwise: In-relations methodological practice. Stylus.

68.

Tefera

A. A.

Fischman

G. E.

(2020). How and why context matters in the study of racial disproportionality in special education: Toward a critical disability education policy approach. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1791284

69.

The QR Collective. (2023). Reflexive Quality Criteria: Questions and Indicators for Purpose-Driven Special Education Qualitative Research. Exceptional Children, Advance online publication [DOI: 10.1177/00144029231168106]

70.

Trainor

A. A.

Graue

(2012). Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences. Routledge.

71.

Trainor

A. A.

Leko

M. M.

(2014). Qualitative special education research: Purpose, rigor, and contribution. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514536996

72.

Trainor

A. A.

Romano

Chen

Y.-L.

Newman

Ozuna Presinal

(in press). Secondary students receiving special education and English learner services: Identity informed transitions. Multiple Voices.

73.

Tuck

(2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15

74.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. State University of New York Press.

75.

Villenas

(1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711–732. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.3483672630865482

76.

Warren

M. R.

Calderón

Kupscznk

L. A.

Squires

(2018). Is collaborative, community-engaged scholarship more rigorous than traditional scholarship? On advocacy, bias, and social science research. Urban Education, 53(4), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918763511

77.

Wong

(2020). Disability visibility: First person stories from the 21st century. Vintage.

78.

Zagona

A. L.

Miller

A. L.

Kurth

J. A.

Love

H. R.

(2019). Parent perspectives on special education services: How do schools implement team decisions? School Community Journal, 29(2), 105–128. http://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/SCJ.aspx

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB

0.19 MB

0.10 MB