Mixed-methods research (MMR) holds promise for investigating several empirical questions within special education, capitalizing on the strengths of quantitative and qualitative traditions. We present an overview of MMR in special education and quality indicators for conducting and reporting such studies. We look to the future for how MMR may advance our understanding of crucial issues related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Finally, we discuss special considerations for MMR and the open science movement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Mixed methods article reporting standards.
2.
AngueraM. T.Blanco-VillasenorA.LosadaJ. L.Sánchez-AlgarraP.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2018). Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2757–2770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0700-2
3.
BastableE.MengP.FalconS. F.McIntoshK. (2019). Using an embedded mixed methods design to assess and improve intervention acceptability of an equity-focused intervention: A methodological demonstration. Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919880486
4.
BazeleyP. (2012). Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426330
5.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.
6.
BengeC. L. (2012). Effect of cartoon mnemonics and revised definitions on the acquisition of tier-two vocabulary words among selected fifth-grade students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Sam Houston State University.
7.
BengeC. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J.RobbinsM. E. (2018). Effect of cartoon mnemonics and revised definitions on the acquisition of tier-2 vocabulary words among selected fifth-grade students: Phase II. Crossover mixed analysis. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 565–588. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v10n1a39
8.
BengeC. L.RobbinsM. E.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2018). Effect of cartoon mnemonics and revised definitions on the acquisition of tier-2 vocabulary words among selected fifth-grade students: Phase I. Noncrossover mixed analysis. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v10n1a38
9.
BertilssonI.GyllenstenA. L.OpheimA.GardG.HammarlundC. S. (2018). Understanding one’s body and movements from the perspective of young adults with autism: A mixed-methods study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 78, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.002
10.
BrantlingerE.JiminezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
11.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600307
12.
ColeE. V.CawthonS. W. (2015). Self-disclosure decisions of university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 163–179.
13.
CollinsK. M. T. (2015). Validity in multimethod and mixed research. In Nagy Hesse-BiberS.Burke JohnsonR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 240–256). Oxford University Press.
14.
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2012). Securing a place at the table: A review and extension of legitimation criteria for the conduct of mixed research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 849–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433799
15.
ConroyM. A.HetrickA.HouchinsD.HitchcockJ. (2022). Mixed and multiple methods in emotional and behavioral disorders research: A literature review [Manuscript submitted for review].
16.
CookB. G.CookL. (2016). Research designs and special education research: Different designs address different questions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(4), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12110
17.
CookB. G.FlemingJ. I.HartS. A.LaneK. L.TherrienW. J.van DijkW.WilsonS. E. (2021). A how-to guide for open-science practices in special education research. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publicationhttps://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211019100
18.
CookB. G.LloydJ. W.MellorD.NosekB. A.TherrienW. J. (2018). Promoting open science to increase the trustworthiness of evidence in special education. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918793138
19.
CooperJ. N.HallJ. (2016). Understanding black male student athletes’ experiences at a historically Black college/university: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814558451
20.
CorrC.LoveH.SnodgrassM.KernJ.ChudzikM. (in press). Methodological training in special education doctoral programs: A mixed methods exploration. Teacher Education and Special Education.
21.
CorrC.SnodgrassM. R.LoveH.ScottI. M.KimJ.AndrewsL. (2021). Exploring the landscape of published mixed methods research in special education: A systematic review. Remedial and Special Education, 42(5), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520924030
22.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
23.
CreswellJ. W.ShopeR.Plano ClarkV. L.GreenD. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1–11.
24.
CrossF. L.AgiA.MontoroJ. P.MedinaM. A.Miller-TejadaS.PinettaB. J.Rivas-DrakeD. (2020). Illuminating ethnic-racial socialization among undocumented Latinx parents and its implications for adolescent psychosocial functioning. Developmental Psychology, 56(8), 1458–1474. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000826
25.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2009). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Wiley.
26.
FàbreguesS.Molina-AzorínJ. F. (2017). Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2847–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4
27.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
28.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9, 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/155868981558122
29.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorínJ. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066
30.
GarwoodJ. D.WertsM. G.VargheseC.GoseyL. (2018). Mixed-methods analysis of rural special educators’ role stressors, behavior management, and burnout. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517745270
31.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.
32.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
33.
HallB.HowardK. (2008). A synergistic approach: Conducting mixed methods research with typological and systemic design considerations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808314622
34.
Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press.
35.
HeyvaertM.HannesK.MaesB.OnghenaP. (2013). Critical appraisal of mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 302–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813479449
36.
HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2014). The What Works Clearinghouse single-case design pilot standards: Who will guard the guards?Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518979
37.
HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (in press). The Routledge handbook for advancements in mixed methods integration. Routledge.
38.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
39.
HowieE. K.CampbellA. C.AbbottR. A.StrakerL. M. (2017). Understanding why an active video game intervention did not improve motor skill and physical activity in children with developmental coordination disorder: A quantity or quality issue?Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.013
40.
HuntJ. H.MartinK.KhounmeuangA.SilvaJ.PattersonB.Welch-PtakJ. (2020). Design, development, and initial testing of asset-based intervention grounded in trajectories of student fraction learning. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720963589
41.
JohnsonR. B. (2017). Dialectical pluralism: A metaparadigm whose time has come. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 156–173.
42.
JohnsonR. B.ChristensenL. B. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage.
43.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
44.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1558689806298224
45.
JohnsonR. B.TurnerL. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297–319). Sage.
46.
JonesT. M.WillifordA.SpencerM. S.RiggsN. R.TollR.GeorgeM.BruickS. (2021). School mental health providers’ perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on racial inequities and school disengagement. Children & Schools, 43(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdab009
47.
KlingnerJ. K.BoardmanA. G. (2011). Addressing the “research gap” in special education through mixed methods. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(3), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711417559
48.
KozleskiE. B. (2017). The uses of qualitative research: Powerful methods to inform evidence-based practice in education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916683710
49.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
50.
LekoM. M. (2014). The value of qualitative methods in social validity research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514524002
51.
LoveH. R.CorrC. (2022). Integrating without quantitizing: Two examples of deductive analysis strategies within qualitatively driven mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989833
52.
MarshR.HouchinsD. E.ChristensonC. (2022). Using an integrated approach when conducting juvenile justice special education mixed research. In HitchcockJ.OnwuegbuzieA. (Eds.), Handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods (pp. XX–XX). Routledge.
53.
McLeodB. D.SutherlandK. S.ConroyM. A.LyonA. R.ChapmanJ. E.GrangerK. L.SaldanaL. (2022). Study protocol: Multi-level determinants of implementation and sustainment in the education sector. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426622109016
54.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H.GutierrezR.OshrinS. (2021). Promoting quality of mixed methods consultation research: A synergistic participatory framework. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743
55.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Thenation’s report card.
56.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Characteristics of postsecondary faculty. In The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020-144).
57.
NewmanI.HouchinsD. E. (2018). Conceptualizing mixed methods questions in special education research. Research in the Schools, 24(2), 23–33.
58.
NzabonimpaJ. P. (2018). Quantitizing and qualitizing (im-)possibilities in mixed methods research. Methodological Innovations, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118789021
59.
O’CathainA. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework. In TashakkoriA.TeddieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 531–555). Sage.
60.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201
61.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2012). Introduction: Putting the mixed back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving towards the radical middle. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6, 192–219. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.192
62.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CorriganJ. A. (2018). What is happening now? An overview of mixed methods applications in special education. Research in the Schools, 25(2), 1–22.
63.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
PetrenkoC. L. M.PandolfinoM. E.RoddenberyR. (2016). The association between parental attributions of misbehavior and parenting practices in caregivers raising children with prenatal alcohol exposure: A mixed-methods study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 59, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.005
66.
Plano ClarkV. L. P.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field (Vol. 3). Sage.
67.
ReganK. S.BerkeleyS. L.HughesM.BradyK. K. (2015). Understanding practitioner perceptions of responsiveness to intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(4), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715580437
ScanlonD.SaenzL.KellyM. P. (2018). The effectiveness of alternative IEP dispute resolution practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(2), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717698827
70.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
71.
SullivanA. L.KlingbeilD. A.Van NormanE. R. (2013). Beyond behavior: Multilevel analysis of the influence of sociodemographics and school characteristics on students’ risk of suspension. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087493
72.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage.
73.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
74.
TrainorA. A.GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100
75.
UnwinK. L.PowellG.JonesC. R. (2021). A sequential mixed-methods approach to exploring the experiences of practitioners who have worked in multi-sensory environments with autistic children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104061
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
