Preview and Introduction of Open-Science Guidelines

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Farnham

Kurz

Öztürk

M. A.

Solbiati

Myllyntaus

. . . Hettne

(2017). Early career researchers want open science. Genome Biology, 18, 221. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1351-7

Giofrè

Cumming

Fresc

Boedker

Tressoldi

(2017). The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0175583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175583

Kidwell

M. C.

Lazarević

L. B.

Baranski

Hardwicke

T. E.

Piechowski

Falkenberg

L.-S.

. . . Nosek

B. A.

(2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biol, 14(5), e1002456. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

McBee

M. T.

Makel

M. C.

Peters

S. J.

Matthews

M. S.

(2018). A call for open science in giftedness research. Gifted Child Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0016986218784178

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Open science by design: Realizing a vision for 21st century research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25116

Nosek

B. A.

Alter

Banks

G. C.

Borsboom

Bowman

S. D.

Brckler

S. J.

. . . Yarkoni

(2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348, 1422–1425. doi:10.1126/science.aab2374

Piwowar

H. A.

Day

R. S.

Fridsma

D. B.

(2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308

Van der Zee

Reich

. (2018). Open education science. AERA Open, 4. doi:10.1177/2332858418787466