The increased prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has intensified the need for high-quality special education services designed for children and youth with ASD and their families. Implementation science provides guidance for moving innovation, such as utilizing evidence-based practices for students with ASD, into regular practice in schools. The National Professional Development Center on ASD (NPDC) incorporated the principles of implementation science, the scientific knowledge about evidence-based practices, and the measurement of program quality into an intervention approach for students with ASD. This article presents the NPDC model as an example of using implementation science to build systems of professional development that increase the quality of services and promote teachers’ use of evidence-based practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenjaminiY., & HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300.
2.
BoyleC. A., BouletS., SchieveL. A., CohenR. A., BlumbergS. J., Yeargin-AllsoppM., … KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in prevalence of developmental disabilities in U.S. children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2989
3.
CarrR. A. (1979). Goal attainment scaling as a useful tool for evaluating progress in special education. Exceptional Children, 45, 88–95.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders—Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(3). 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6103.pdf
5.
ChamblessD. L., SandersonW. C., ShohamV., Bennett Johnson, S., PopeK. S., Crits-ChristophP., … McCurryS. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5–18.
6.
ChenH. (1998). Theory-driven evaluations. Advances in Educational Productivity, 7, 15–34.
7.
CoxA., BrockM. E., OdomS. L., RogersS. J., SullivanL. H., Tuchman-GinsbergL., … Collett-KlingenbergL. (in press). National professional development center on autism spectrum disorders: An emerging national trend. In DoehringP. & Becker-CotrillB. (Eds.), Facing autism nationally: Regional training and service programs for children with autism.Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
8.
DaneA. V., & SchneiderB. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3
9.
DomitrovichC. E., BradshawC. P., PoduskaJ. M., HoogwoodK., BuckleyJ. A., OlinS., … IalongoN. S. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 1, 6–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2008.9715730
10.
DilckersM. L. A., WagnerC., VosL., & GroenewegenP. P. (2011). Understanding organisational development, sustainability, and diffusion of innovations within hospitals participating in a multilevel quality collaborative. Implonentation Science, 608). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1/48-5908-6-18
11.
DurlakJ. A., & DuPreE. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
12.
FixsenD. (2011, August). Implementation 2020.Keynote presentation at the Global Implementation Conference, Washington, DC.
13.
FixsenD. L., NaoomS. F., BlaseK. A., FriedmanR. M., & WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature.Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network.
14.
FranzoneE., KucharczykS., SullivanL., & SzidonR. (2012). Facilitating the use of evidence-based practices in classrooms: The National Professional Development Center Model. In MundyP. & MastergeorgeA. (Eds.), Educational Interventions for Students with Autism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change.(3rd ed.). New York, NY, and London, England: Teachers College Press and Routledge Falmer.
16.
GerstenR., FuchsL. S., ComptonD., CoyneM., GreenwoodC., & InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
17.
GreenbergM. T., DomitrovichC. E., GraczykP. A., & ZinsJ. E. (2005). The study of implementation in school-based preventive interventions: Theory, research, and practice. Promotion of Mental Health and Prevention of Mental and Behavior Disorders(Vol. 3). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
18.
HornerR., CarrE., HalleJ., McGeeG., OdomS., & WoleryM. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.
19.
IDEA Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 (2006).
20.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §4301 et seq. (2006).
21.
JoyS. M. (2008). The impact of legislation and litigation on the education of students with autism spectrum disorders. Dissertation Abstracts International, A. The Humanities and Social Sciences, 0419–4209.
22.
KiresukT. J., & ShermanR. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluation comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01530764
23.
KucharczykS., MastergeorgeA., ShawE., Smith MylesB., StabelA., SullivanL., … Tuchman-GinsbergL. (2010). Guidelines for effective coaching practices.Chapel Hill, NC: National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina.
24.
MandellD., WigginsL., CarpenterL., DanielsJ., DiGuiseppiC., DurkinM., … KirbyR. S. (2009). Racial/ethical disparities in the identification of children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 493–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131243
25.
MittmanB. (2011, August). Integration of implementation research, practice, and policy across human services.Plenary presentation at the Global Implementation Conference, Washington, DC.
National Professional Development Center on ASD. (2011). Autism program environment rating scale (Preschool/elementary and middle/high school).Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
29.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027112l408329171
30.
OdomS. L., Collet-KlingenbergL., RogersS., & HattonD. (2010). Evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54, 275–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506
OdomS. L., & FettigA. (in press). Evidence-based practice in response-to-intervention in early childhood. In BuysseV. & Peisner-FeinbergE. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood response to intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
33.
OdomS. L., HansonM. J., LieberJ., DiamondK., PalmerS., ButeraG., & HornE. (2010). Prevention, early childhood intervention, and implementation science. In & DollB., PfohlW., & YoonJ.J. (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 413–433). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
OdomS. L., HumeK., BoydB., & StabelA. (2012). Moving beyond the intensive behavior treatment vs. eclectic dichotomy: Evidence-based and individualized programs for learners with ASD. Behavior Modification, 36, 270–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0145445512444595
35.
RubleL., McGrewJ. H., & TolandM. D. (2012). Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-l446-7
36.
SchlosserR. W. (2004). Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: A critical review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 217–239.
37.
SchlosserR. W., & SigafoosJ. (2008). Editorial: Identifying ‘evidence-based practice’ versus ‘empirically supported treatment.’Evidence-Based Communication and Assessment and Intervention, 2, 61–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17489530802308924
38.
ShusterS. K., FitzgeraldN., SheltonG., BarberP., & DeschS. (1984). Goal attainment scaling with moderately and severely handicapped preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 8, 26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105381518400800104
39.
U.S. Department of Education Data Accountability Center. (2006). Table 1–8. Children and students served under IDEA, Part B, by age and state: Fall 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ideadata.org/tables29th/ar_1-1.htm
40.
VolkmarF. R., LordC., BaileyA., SchultzR. T., & KlinA. (2004). Autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 135–170. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00317.x
41.
YellM. L., DrasgowE., LowreyK. A. (2005). No child left behind and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 130–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200030101
42.
YellM. L., KatsiyannisA., DrasgowA., & HerbstM. (2003). Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate programs for students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disorders, 18, 182–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576030180030601
43.
ZahnerG., & PaulsD. (1987). Epidemiological survey of infantile autism. In CohenD. J. & DonnellanA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 199–207). Toronto, Canada: Wiley.
44.
ZirkelP. (2002). The autism case law: Administrative and judicial rulings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(2), 84–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576020170020301
