Establishing a process for identifying evidence-based practices (EBPs) in special education has been a significant advance for the field because it has the potential for generating more effective educational programs and producing more positive outcomes for students with disabilities. However, the potential benefit of EBPs is bounded by the quality, reach, and maintenance of implementation. The cross-disciplinary field of implementation science has great relevance for translating the promise of EBPs into positive outcomes for children and youth with disabilities. This article examines the history, extent, and limitations of EBPs and describes the emergence and current state of implementation science as applied in special education. Subsequent articles in this special issue of Exceptional Children address a range of issues related to implementation science in special education: the research-to-practice gap, dissemination and diffusion, adherence and sustainability, scaling up, a model for state-level implementation, and fostering implementation through professional development.
BurnsM. K., & YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022466908315563
3.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.
4.
CookB. G., & CookS. C. (2011). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. Journal of Special Education.Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022466911420877
5.
CookB. G., & SmithG. J. (2012). Leadership and instruction: Evidence-based practices in special education. In CrockettJ. B., BillingsleyB. S., & BoscardinM. L. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership in special education (pp. 281–296). London, England: Routledge.
6.
CookB. G., SmithG. J., & TankersleyM. (2012). Evidence-based practices in education. In HarrisK. R., GrahamS., & UrdanT. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, volume 1 (pp. 495–528). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
CookB. G., TankersleyM., & LandrumT. J. (2009a). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365–383.
8.
CookB. G., TankersleyM., & LandrumT. J. (Eds.). (2009b). Evidence-based practices for reading, math, writing, and behavior [Special issue]. Exceptional Children, 75.
9.
CrosseS., WilliamsB., HagenC. A., HarmonM., RistowL., DiGaetanoR.,… DerzonJ. H. (2011). Prevalence and implementation fidelity of research-based prevention programs in public schools: Final report.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/research-based-prevention.pdf
10.
DetrichR. (2008). Evidence-based, empirically supported, or best practice? A guide for the scientist-practitioner. In LuiselliJ. K., RussoD. C., ChristianW. P., & WilczynskiS. M. (Eds.), Effective practices for children with autism (pp. 3–25). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
DonovanM. S., & CrossC. T. (Eds.) (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
FixsenD. L., NaoomS. F., BlaseK. A., FriedmanR. M., & WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature.Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Retrieved from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/-nirn/resources/publications/Monograph/pdf/Monograph_full.pdf
16.
GallagherD. J. (2004). Educational research, philosophical orthodoxy, and unfulfilled promises: The quandary of traditional research in U.S. special education. In ThomasG. & PringR. (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in education (pp. 119–132). Columbus, OH: Open University Press.
17.
GerstenR., FuchsL. S., ComptonD., CoyneM., GreenwoodC., & InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
18.
GlasgowR., VogtT., & BolesS. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
19.
GreenhalghT., RobertG., MacFarlaneF., BateP., & KyriakidouO. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
20.
GreenwoodC. R., & AbbottM. (2001). The research to practice in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088840640102400403
21.
HammersleyM. (2005). Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Reflections on Iain Chambers’ case for research-based policy making and practice. Evidence & Policy, 1(1), 85–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/1744264052703203
22.
HammersleyM. (Ed.). (2007). Educational research and evidence-based practice.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
HeathC., & HeathD. (2008). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die.New York, NY: Random House.
HornerR. H., CarrE.G., HalleJ., McGeeG., OdomS., & WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
26.
HornerR. H., SugaiG., & AndersonC. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8), 1–14.
27.
McintoshK., FilterK. J., BennettJ. L., RyanC., & SugaiG. (2010). Principles of sustainable prevention: Designing scale-up of school-wide positive behavior support to promote durable systems. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 5–21.
28.
McintoshK., HornerR. H., & SugaiG. (2009). Sustainability of systems-level evidence-based practices in schools: Current knowledge and future directions. In & SailorW., DunlapG., SugaiG., & HornerR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 327–352). New York, NY: Springer.
29.
MostertM. P., & CrockettJ. B. (1999–2000). Reclaiming the history of special education for more effective practice. Exceptionality, 8(2), 133–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX0802_4
30.
National Autism Center. (2009). National standards report.Randolph, MA: Author.
NelsonS. R., LefflerJ. C., & HansenB. A. (2009). Toward a research agenda for understanding and improving the use of research evidence.Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/311
34.
OdomS. L. (2005). Criteria for evidence-based practice in special education [Special issue]. Exceptional Children, 71.
35.
OdomS. L. (2009). The ties that bind: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0271121408329171
36.
OdomS. L., BrantlingerE., GerstenR., HornerR. H., ThompsonB., & HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
37.
OdomS. L., Collet-KlingenbergL., RogersS., & HattonD. (2010). Evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54, 275–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506
38.
RittelH. W. J., & WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
39.
RogersE. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations.New York, NY: Free Press.
40.
SackettD. L., RosenbergW. M., GrayJ. A., HaynesR. B., & RichardsonW. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
41.
SarasonS. B. (1993). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
SeethalerP. M., & FuchsL. S. (2005). A drop in the bucket: Randomized controlled trials testing reading and math interventions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 98–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00125.x
43.
SignalL. N., WaltonM. D., MhurchuC. N., MaddisonR., BowersS. G., CarterK. N., … PearceJ. (2012). Tackling ‘wicked’ health promotion problems: A New Zealand case study. Health Promotion International, 31, 441–455.
44.
SlavinR. E. (2008a). Evidence-based reform in education: Which evidence counts? Response to comments. Educational Researcher, 37, 47–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08315082
StokesD. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation.Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47.
StrausS. E., Tetroe, & Graham. (2009). Defining knowledge translation. Canadian Medication Association Journal, 181(3–4), 165–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081229
48.
SugaiG., & HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining the implementation of school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
49.
ThomasG., & PringR. (Eds.). (2004). Evidence-based practice in education.Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
50.
TorgesenJ. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1501_6
