Promoting self-determination has become “best practice” in the education of students with disabilities. We synthesize the decade's work in this area as a foundation for considering issues pertaining to promoting self-determination in light of the current educational context. We particularly examine the role of promoting self-determination in light of federal standards-based reform initiatives. We conclude that school reform efforts provide an opportunity to infuse instruction in self-determination into the education programs of all students, including students with disabilities. Many state and local standards include a focus on component elements of self-determined behavior and promoting self-determination enables students to perform more effectively within other content domains. The importance of personnel preparation to enable teachers to promote self-determination is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberyB.RudrudL.ArndtK.SchaubenL.EggebeenA. (1995). Evaluating a multicomponent program for enhancing the self-determination of youth with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(3), 170–179.
2.
AberyB.ZajacR. (1996). Self-determination as a goal of elementary education. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the lifespan: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 169–196). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
AberyB. H.StancliffeR. J.SmithJ.McGrewK.EggebeenA. (1995). Minnesota Opportunities and Exercise of Self-Determination Scale—Adult Edition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
4.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student-directed learning: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351–364.
5.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.
6.
AndersonD.Kleinhammer-TramillJ.MorningstarM.BlalockG.KohlerP.LehmannJ.WehmeyerM. (2003). What is happening in personnel preparation in transition? A national survey. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 145–160.
7.
BenzM.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.
8.
BlantonL.GriffinC.WinnJ.PugachM. (1997). Teacher education in transition: Collaborative programs to prepare general and special educators. Denver, CO: Love.
9.
BurchardS. (1996). Mastering the developmental challenges of childhood and adolescence. In PowersL. E.SingerG. H. S.SowersJ. (Eds.), Promoting self-competence in youth with disabilities: On the road to autonomy (pp. 111–145). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (1998–1999). The National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum [Electronic version]. Retrieved June 25, 2003, from http://www.cast.org/ncac/.
11.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1997–1999). Common core of knowledge and skills essential for beginning special education teachers. Retrieved March 4, 2004, from http://www.cec.sped.org/ps/ps-entry.
12.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2000). Standards for preparation of transition specialists. Retrieved March 4, 2004, from http://www.cec.sped.org/ps/transition.doc.
13.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). Council for Exceptional Children Professional Standards. Retrieved March 4, 2004, from http://www.cec.sped.org/ps/.
14.
DeshlerD. D.EllisE. S.LenzB. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
15.
DollB.SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. (1996). Promoting the development and acquisition of self-determined behavior. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 65–90). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
ErwinE. J.BrownF. (2000, November). Variables that contribute to self-determination in early childhood. TASH Newsletter, 26(3), 8–10.
17.
Federal Register, Volume 54, No. 177, Thursday, September 14, 1989, p. 38166.
18.
FieldS. (1996). Self-determination instructional strategies for youth with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 40–52.
19.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. 17, 159–169.
20.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (1996a). Steps to self-determination. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (1996b). Promoting self-determination in school reform, individualized planning, and curriculum efforts. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 197–213). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998a). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
23.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998b). Self-determination in career and transition programming: A position statement of the Council for Exceptional Children. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 113–128.
24.
FullertonA. (1998). Putting feet on my dreams: Involving students with autism in life planning. In WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J. (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in education planning, decision-making and instruction (pp. 279–296). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
GastD. L.JacobsH. A.LoganK. R.MurrayA. S.HollowayA.LongL. (2000). Pre-session assessment of preferences for students with profound multiple disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 393–405.
26.
HalpernA. S. (2000). Federal funding trends for national transition projects. In JohnsonD. R.EmanuelE. J. (Eds.), Issues influencing the future of transition programs and services in the United States (pp. 39–53). Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
27.
HalpernA. S.HerrC. M.DorenB.WolfN. K. (2000). Next S.T.E.P.: Student transition and educational planning. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
28.
HoffmanA.FieldS.FullertonA. (2003). Knowledge, skills and beliefs that support the self-determination of educators. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29.
JanneyR.SnellM. (2000). Teachers' guides to inclusive practices: Modifying schoolwork. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
JohnstonM. (1997). Contradictions in collaboration: New thinking on school/university partnerships. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
31.
Kame'enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C. (1999). Toward successful inclusion of students with disabilities: The architecture of instruction. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
32.
KnowltonE. (1998). Considerations in the design of personalized curricular supports for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 95–107.
33.
Kochhar-BryantC.BassettD. (2003). Aligning transition and standards-based education: Issues and strategies (pp. 25–40). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
34.
LesarS.BennerS. M.HabelJ.ColemanL. (1997). Preparing general education teachers for inclusive settings: A constructivist teacher education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 204–220.
35.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H. (1995). ChoiceMaker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 147–156.
36.
MasonC.FieldS.SawilowskyS. (2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children70, 421–435.
37.
McLeskeyJ.HenryD.AxelrodM. I. (1999). Inclusion of students with learning disabilities: An examination of data from reports to Congress. Exceptional Children, 66, 55–66.
38.
MercerC. D.LaneH. B.JordanL.AllsoppD. H.EiselleM. R. (1996). Empowering teachers and students with instructional choices in inclusive settings. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 226–236.
39.
MithaugD. E. (1996). The optimal prospects principle: A theoretical basis for rethinking instructional practices for self-determination. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 147–165). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
40.
NoletV.McLaughlinM. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA; Corwin Press.
41.
OsguthorpeR. T.HarrisR. C.HarrisM. F.BlackS. (Eds.). (1995). Partner schools: Centers for educational research. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.
42.
PalmerS.WehmeyerM. L. (2003). Promoting self-determination in early elementary school: Teaching self-regulated problem-solving and goal setting skills. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–126.
43.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.GipsonK.AgranM. (2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children, 70, 407–420.
44.
RealonR. E.FavellJ. E.LowerreA. (1990). The effects of making choices on engagement levels with persons who are profoundly mentally handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 248–254.
45.
SandsD. J.AdamsL.StoutD. M. (1995). A statewide exploration of the nature and use of curriculum in special education. Exceptional Children, 62, 68–83.
46.
SchunkD. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills on learning disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 307–316.
47.
SkrticT. M.SailorW.GeeK. (1996). Voice, collaboration, and inclusion: Democratic themes in educational and social reform initiatives. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 142–157.
48.
SowersJ.PowersL. (1995). Enhancing the participation and independence of students with severe physical and multiple disabilities in performing community activities. Mental Retardation, 33, 209–220.
49.
TestD. W.KarvonenM.WoodW. M.BrowderD.AlgozzineB. (2000). Choosing a self-determination curriculum: Plan for the future. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(2), 48–54.
50.
ThomaC. A.NathansonR.BakerS. R.TamuraR. (2002). Self-determination: What do special educators know and where do they learn it?Remedial and Special Education, 23, 242–247.
51.
TomlinsonC. A.CallahanC. M.TomchinE. M.EissN.ImbeauM.LandrumM. (1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: Addressing academic diversity in contemporary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 269–282.
52.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S.ChappleJ. W. (1996). Preparing teachers to support inclusion: Preservice and inservice programs. Theory and Practice, 35, 42–50.
54.
WardM.KohlerP. (1996). Teaching self-determination: Content and process. In PowersL. E.SingerG. H. S.SowersJ. (Eds.), On the road to autonomy (pp. 275–290). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
55.
WardM. J. (1996). Coming of age in the age of self-determination: A historical and personal perspective. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 1–16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
56.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.
57.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996a). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities?. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15–34). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
58.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996b). A self-report measure of self-determination for adolescents with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282–293.
59.
WehmeyerM. L. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: Examining meanings and misinterpretations. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 5–16.
60.
WehmeyerM. L. (2001). Self-determination and mental retardation. In GliddenL. M. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 24, pp. 1–48). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
62.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
63.
WehmeyerM. L.LattinD.AgranM. (2001). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A decision-making model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 329–344.
64.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. (2000). Promoting the acquisition and development of self-determination in young children with disabilities. Early Education and Development, 11, 465–481.
65.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
66.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. (2000). Teaching students to become causal agents in their lives: The self-determining learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453.
67.
WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J. (1998). Making it happen: Student involvement in education planning, decision-making and instruction. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
68.
WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J.KnowltonE. H.KozleskiE. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Promoting access to the general curriculum. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
69.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
70.
WeimerM. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
WolmanJ.CampeauP.DuboisP.MithaugD.StolarskiV. (1994). AIR self-determination scale and user guide. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research.
72.
ZhangD. (2001). Self-determination and inclusion: Are students with mild mental retardation more self-determined in regular classrooms?Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 357–362.
