The development of collaborative partnerships between parents and professionals is too often unsuccessful. One reason for this failure may be the lack of empirical understanding of the components of interpersonal partnerships. Using qualitative inquiry, 33 focus groups were conducted with adult family members of children with and without disabilities and service providers and administrators. In addition, 32 individual interviews were conducted with non-English-speaking parents and their service providers. Indicators of professional behavior facilitative of collaborative partnerships were identified. These indicators were organized into six broad themes: (a) Communication, (b) Commitment, (c) Equality, (d) Skills, (e) Trust, and (f) Respect. The specific meaning of each theme is described, including similarities and differences between professionals and family members. Policy, practice, and future research implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanH.TaylorL. (1997b). Toward a scale-up model for replicating new approaches to schooling. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 5, 197–230.
2.
AdelmanH. S.TaylorL. (1997a). Addressing barriers to learning: Beyond school-linked services and full service schools. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, 408–421.
3.
AllenR. I.PetrC. G. (1996). Toward developing standards and measurements for family-centered practice in family support programs. In SingerG. H. S.PowersL. E.OlsonA. L. (Eds.), Redefining family support: Innovations in public-private partnerships (pp. 57–86). Baltimore:, MD: Brookes.
4.
ApplequistK. L.BaileyD. B. (2000). Navajo care-givers' perceptions of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention Services, 23, 47–61.
5.
BaileyD. B.McWilliamR. A.DarkesL. A.HebbelerK.SimeonssonR. J.SpikerD.WagnerM. (1998). Family outcomes in early intervention: A framework for program evaluation and efficacy research. Exceptional Children, 64, 313–328.
6.
Blue-BanningM. J.TurnbullA. P.PereiraL. (2000). Group action planning as a support strategy for Hispanic families: Parent and professional perspectives. Mental Retardation, 38 (2), 262–275.
7.
BruderM. B. (2000). Family-centered early intervention: Clarifying our values for the new millennium. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 105–115.
8.
Children's Aid Society. (1997). Building a community school (Rev. ed.). New York: Author.
9.
CreswellJ. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
DinnebeilL. A.HaleL. M.RuleS. (1996). A qualitative analysis of parents' and service coordinators' descriptions of variables that influence collaborative relationships. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 322–347.
11.
DinnebeilL. A.HaleL. M.RuleS. (2000). Early intervention program practices that support collaboration. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 225–235.
12.
DunstC. J. (2000). Revisiting “Rethinking early intervention.”Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 95–104.
13.
EpsteinJ. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
FeinbergE.BeyerJ.MosesP. (2002). Beyond mediation: Strategies for appropriate early dispute resolution in special education. Unpublished manuscript. National Center on Alternative Dispute Resolution (CADRE): Eugene, OR.
15.
FettermanD. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step (Applied social research methods series, Vol. 17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
HarryB.RuedaR.KalyanpurM. (1999). Cultural reciprocity in sociocultural perspective: Adapting the normalization principle for family collaboration. Exceptional Children, 66, 123–136.
18.
JonesT. M.GarlowJ.TurnbullH. R.BarberP. A. (1996). Best practices: Empowerment in a family support program: Program, professional, and policy issues. In SingerG. H. S.PowersL. E.OlsonA. L. (Eds.), Redefining family support: Innovations in public-private partnerships (pp. 87–114). Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (1999). Culture in special education: Building a posture of reciprocity in parent-professional relationships. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
20.
KruegerR. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
LynchE. W.HansonM. H. (1998). Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with children and their families (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
23.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MasseyD. S.ZambranaR. E.BellS. A. (1995). Contemporary issues in Latino families: Future directions for research, policy, and practice. In ZambranaR. E., (Ed.), Understanding Latino families: Scholarship, policy, and practice (pp. 190–204). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
McKnightJ. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
26.
McWilliamR.MaxwellK.SloperK. (1999). Beyond involvement: Are elementary schools ready to be family-centered?School Psychology Review, 28 (3), 378–394.
27.
McWilliamR. A.TocciL.HarbinG. L. (1998). Family-centered services: Service providers' discourse and behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 206–221.
28.
NisbetJ.CovertS.SchuhM. (1992). Family involvement in the transition from school to adult life. In RuschF. R.DeStefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsL. A.SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 408–424). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
29.
OsherT. W.OsherD. M. (2002). The paradigm shift to true collaboration with families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11 (1), 47–60.
30.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J.HuerM. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 177–190.
31.
ParkJ.TurnbullA. P. (2002). Families speak out: What are quality indicators of professionals in working with children with problem behavior?Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 118–123.
32.
ParkJ.TurnbullA. P. (2003). Service integration in early intervention: Determining interpersonal and structural factors for its success. Infants & Young Children, 16, 48–58.
33.
PattonM. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
PugachM. C. (2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67, 439–453.
35.
RainforthB.YorkJ.MacdonaldC. (1992). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore: Brookes.
36.
RobertsR. N.RuleS.InnocentiM. (1998). Strengthening the family-professional partnership in services for young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
37.
SalembierG.FurneyK. (1998). Speaking up for your child's future. Exceptional Parent, 28 (7), 62–64.
38.
SandallS. P.SmithB. J.McLeanM. E.RamseyA. L. (2002). Qualitative research in early intervention/early childhood special education. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 129–136.
39.
SandersM. (1999). Improving school, family and community partnerships in urban middle schools. Middle School Journal, 31 (2), 35–41.
40.
SeidmanI. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
SileoT. W.PraterM. A. (1998). Preparing professionals for partnerships with parents of students with disabilities: Textbook considerations regarding cultural diversity. Exceptional Children, 64, 513–528.
42.
SoodakL. C.ErwinE. J. (2000). Valued member or tolerated participant: Parents' experiences in inclusive early childhood settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 29–41.
43.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1989). Using qualitative data collection procedures to investigate supported education issues. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 271–277.
44.
StewartD. W.ShamdasaniP. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
SummersJ. A.SteeplesT.PetersonC.NaigL.McBrideS.WallS.LiebowH.SwansonM.StowitschekJ. (2001). Policy and management supports for effective service integration in Early Head Start and Part C programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 16–30.
46.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.BoydK.HambyD. W. (1995). Family-oriented program models, helpgiving practices, and parental control appraisals. Exceptional Children, 62, 237–248.
47.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
48.
TurnbullH. R.TurnbullA. P. (2000). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (6th ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
49.
WintonP. J. (2000). Early childhood intervention personnel preparation: Backward mapping for future planning. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 87–94.
