The major objectives of this 1991 study of Canadian nonprofit housing cooperatives were to investigate how differences in design and the variable ability of residents, especially people with disabilities, to control important features of their spatial environment affect their quality of life. The research was concerned centrally with relationships among control, built form, social organization, and perceived quality of life. The materials discussed focus on residents' assessments. A sample of 16 co-ops was drawn, all except 2 in the Metro Toronto region. Data were gathered through site visits, interviews, and a mail survey conducted of all co-op households containing a member with a disability and half of all other households. Results showed that those residents who felt they could influence their co-op the most and those who found that the co-op form of social organization made the most difference to their housing satisfaction also rated their residential quality of life the highest. That is, residents' perceived social control over their residential environment was more important than their perceived physical control in explaining perceived quality of life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, F. , & Withey, S. (1976). Social indicators of well being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.
2.
Amstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
3.
Barrier-Free Design Centre . (n.d.). The source book. Toronto: Author.
4.
Beesley, K. , & Russwurm, L. (1989). Social indicators and quality of life research: Towards synthesis. Environments, 20, 22-39.
5.
Campbell, A. , Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) . (1990). Evaluation of the federal co-operative housing programs: Draft report. Ottawa: Author.
7.
Carr, S. , Francis, M., Rivlin, L., & Stone, A. (1992). Public space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cooper, M. , & Rodman, M. (1992a). Housing cooperatives in Toronto: An evaluation of resident control. Open House International, 17(2), 5-16.
9.
Cooper, M. , & Rodman, M. (1992b). New neighbours: A case study of cooperative housing in Toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
10.
Crewe, N. , & Zola, I. (Eds.). (1983). Independent living for physically disabled people. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Francescato, G. , Weidemann, S., Anderson, J. R., & Chenoweth, R. (1974). Evaluating residents' satisfaction in housing for low and moderate income families: A multi-method approach. In D. H. Carson (Ed.), Man-environment interactions: Evaluation and applications (Vol. 5, pp. 285-296). Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.
12.
Francescato, G. , Weidemann, S., Anderson, J. R., & Chenoweth, R. (1979). Residents' satisfaction in HUD-assisted housing: Design and management factors. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
13.
Francis, M. (1987). The making of democratic streets. In A. Moudon (Ed.), Public streets for public use (pp. 22-39). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
14.
Francis, M. (1989). Control as a dimension of public-space quality. In I. Altman & E. Zube (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Vol. 10. Public places and spaces (pp. 147-172). New York: Plenum.
15.
Friedman, M. , & Lackey, G. (1991). The psychology of human control. New York: Praeger.
16.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
17.
Glazer, N. , & Lilla, M. (1987). The public face of architecture: Civic culture and public spaces. New York: Free Press.
18.
Greer-Wooten, B. , & Velidis, S. (1983). The relationships between objective and subjective indicators of the quality of residential environments: Toronto C.M.A. 1981. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
19.
Laidlaw, A. (1977). Housing you can afford. Toronto: Green Tree.
20.
Langer, E. (1983). The psychology of control. Beveriy Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Lawrence, R. (1987). Housing, dwellings and homes: Design theory, research and practice. New York: Wiley.
22.
Logan, J. , & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Lyon, L. (1987). The community in urban society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
Marans, R. (1975). Perceived quality of residential environments: Some methodological issues. In K. H. Craik & E. Zube (Eds.), Perceiving environmental quality: Research and applications (pp. 123-147). New York: Plenum Press.
26.
Monti, D. (1989). The organizational strengths and weaknesses of resident-managed public housing sites in the United States. Journal of Urban Affairs, 11, 39-52.
27.
Murdie, R. , Rhyne, D., & Bates, J. (1992). Modelling quality of life indicators in Canada: A feasibility analysis. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Centre for Future Studies in Housing and Living Environments.
28.
Myers, D. (1987). Community-relevant measurement of quality of life. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 108-125.
29.
Pacione, M. (1988). Public participation in neighbourhood change. Applied Geography (UK), 8, 229-247.
30.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Robinson, J. (1993). Messages from space: Privacy and power in housing. Paper presented at annual meetings of the Environmental Design Research Association, Chicago.
32.
Rodman, M. , & Cooper, M. (1989). The sociocultural production of urban space: Building a fully accessible Toronto housing cooperative. City & Society, 3, 9-22.
33.
Rodman, M. , & Cooper, M. (1993). Accessibility as a discourse of space. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34.
Selby, J. , & Wilson, A. (1988). Canada's housing co-operatives: An alternative approach to resolving community problems (Research Paper No. 3). Ottawa: Co-operative Housing Foundation of Canada.
35.
Short, J. (1989). The humane city: Cities as if people matter. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
36.
Wandersman, A. (1979a). User participation in planning environments: A conceptual framework. Environment and Behavior, 11, 465-482.
37.
Wandersman, A. (1979b). User participation: A study of types of participation, effects, mediators, and individual differences. Environment and Behavior, 11, 185-208.
38.
Wandersman, A. (1981). A framework of participation in community organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 27-58.
39.
Weidemann, S. , & Anderson, J. R. (1985). A conceptual approach for residential satisfaction. In I. Altman & C. M. Wemer (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Vol. 8. Home environments (pp. 153-182). New York: Plenum.
40.
Wekerle, G. , Dragicevic, R., Jordan, R., Kszyk, I., & Sorenson, M. (1980). Contradictions in ownership, participation and control: The case of condominium housing. In C. Ungerson & V. Kam (Eds.), The consumer experience of housing: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 170-191). Westmead, England: Gower.
41.
Whyte, W. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
42.
Whyte, W. (1988). City: Rediscovering the center. New York: Doubleday.
43.
Wish, N. (1986). Are we really measuring the quality of life? Well-being has subjective dimensions, as well as objective ones. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45, 93-99.
44.
Zehner, R. (1977). Indicators of the quality of life in new communities. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
