This article examines fear of crime in relation to exterior site features on a college campus. The authors propose and test a theoretical model that posits that places that afford offenders refuge, and victims limited prospect and escape, will be seen as unsafe. In three studies, the authors observed behavior, obtained responses to site plans and on-site responses to perceptions of safety in relation to exterior campus areas that varied in prospect, refuge, and escape. The findings confirmed that fear of crime was highest in areas with refuge for potential offenders and low prospect and escape for potential victims. In places such as campuses, which have pronounced fear of crime, designs that manipulate prospect, refuge, and escape could reduce the fear of crime, as well as opportunities for crime.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of place. London: Wiley.
2.
Archea, J. C. (1985). The use of architectural props in the conduct of criminal acts. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2, 245-259.
3.
Box, S. , Hale, C., & Andrews, G. (1988). Explaining fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 28, 340-356.
4.
Camp, G. (1968). Nothing to lose: A study of bank robbery in America. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
5.
Cohen, L. , & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
6.
Eisenman, P. (1989). An interview with Peter Eisenman, Architect Wexner Center for the Visual Arts. Press Kit, February. Wexner Center for the Visual Arts, Ohio State University, Columbus.
7.
Fisher, B. (in press). Neighborhood business proprietors' reactions to crime. Journal of Security Administration.
8.
Fisher, B. , & Nasar, J. (1991). Prospect and refuge: Fear of crime and the building design characteristics. Paper delivered at the Joint ASCP and ASEOP International Conference, Oxford England, July 11, 1991.
9.
Gaines, L. (1989). People power battles campus crime. Security, 26, 44-46.
10.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Micro studies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
Goldberger, P. (1989, November 5). The museum that theory built. The New York Times, p. 38.
12.
Hassinger, J. (1985). Fear of crime in public environments. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2, 289-300.
13.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
14.
Jeffery, C. R. (1977). Crimeprevention throughenvironmentaldesign. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Jones, K. B. (1990). The Wexner fragments for the visual arts. Journal of Architectural Education, 43(3), 34-37.
16.
Lorenz, K. (1964). King Solomon's mine. London: Methuen.
17.
Nasar, J. L. , & Fisher, B. (1991). The design of vulnerability: Cues to fear of crime and reactions to fear. Working Paper, Ohio State University, City and Regional Planning, Columbus.
18.
Nasar, J. L. , & Kang, J. (1989). A post-jury evaluation: The Ohio State University design competion for a center for the visual arts. Environment and Behavior, 21, 464-484.
19.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: MacMillan.
20.
Pablant, P. , & Baxter, J. (1975). Environmental correlates of school vandalism. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 41, 270-279.
21.
Patterson, A. (1974). Unobtrusive measures: Their nature and utility for architects. In J. Lang, C. Burnette, W. Moleski, & D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior: Architecture and the behavioral sciences (pp. 261-273). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
22.
Progressive Architecture. (1985). 66, 98-100.
23.
Progressive Architecture (1989). 70, 68-99.
24.
Raddatz, A. (1988). Crime on campus: Institutional tort liability for the criminal acts of third parties. Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Attorneys.
25.
Skogan, W. G. (1986). Fear of crime and neighborhood change. In A. J. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime (pp. 203-229). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Skogan, W. G. , & Maxfield, M. (1981). Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
27.
Smith, M. C. (1988). Coping with crime on campus. New York: MacMillan.
28.
Stoks, F. G. (1983). Assessing urban public space environments for danger of violent crime-specially rape. In D. Joiner, G. Brimikombe, J. Daish, J. Gray, & D. Kemohan, (Eds.) PAPER: Proceedings of the conference on people and physical environment research (pp. 331-343). Ministry of Works and Development, Wellington, New Zealand.
29.
Student Right to Know and Campus Security Act . (1990). HR 101-883, Section 201-205, 101 st Congress, 2nd sess.
30.
Swisher, K. (1989, October 19). Campus crime. Washington Post, sec. C, p. 5.
31.
Taylor, R. , & Gottfredson, S. (1986). Environmental design, crime, and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. In A. J. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime (pp. 387-416). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
32.
Taylor, M. , & Nee, C. (1988). The role of cues in simulated residential burglary. British Journal of Criminology, 28, 396-401.
33.
Tiffany, W.D. , & Ketchel, J.M. (1979). Psychological deterrence in robberies of banks and its application to other institutions. In J.J. Kramer (Ed.), The role of behavioral sciences in physical security. National Bureau of Standards.
34.
Warr, M. (1984). Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid?Social Science Quarterly, 65, 681-702.
35.
Warr, M. (1990). Dangerous situations: Social context and fear of victimization. Social Forces, 68, 891-907.
36.
Wise, J. (1983). Urban environments and altered behavior: Crime and fear of crime. Paper presented at 14th International Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
