Psychosocial Climate in Correctional Institutions

Abstract

This article presents an attempt to find out whether supplementing the original nine subdimensions of the widely used Correctional Institutions Environment Scale (CIES) with a few additional ones provides any significant new information about institutional climate. Three new subscales containing 39 items were developed. They were named Judiciary System, Socio-spatial Conditions, and Physical Environment Conditions. The instrument was administered to all 398 male residents in both a maximum and a minimum security correctional facility. The factor analysis showed that the new subscales were related to the same general factor as the original ones. The linear stepwise regression indicated that the Physical Environment Conditions and Socio-spatial Conditions subscales were superior to the six original ones in discriminating between the two very different penal institutions. The proposed nine subdimensions of the CIES seem to be neither the only nor the most distinctive attributes of the correctional social climate.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajdukovic, D., & Kulenovic, A. (1989). Konstrukcija skale za ispitivanje psihosocijalne klime u penalnim ustanovama. Penoloske teme, 4.

Arthur, R. J. (1971). Success is predictable. Military Medicine, 136, 539-545.

Brinc, F. (1985). Dolocitelji druzbenega vzdusja v kaznenih zavodih v SR Sloveniji. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 36, 304-317.

Brinc, F. (1987). Otvorene kazneno-popravne ustanove od ideje do stvarnosti. Penoloske teme, 2, 3-22.

Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Megargee, E. I. (1977). The association of population density, reduced space, and uncomfortable temperatures with misconduct in a prison community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 289-298.

Moos, R. (1974). Correctional Institutions Environment Scale Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Moos, R. (1975). Evaluating correctional and community settings. New York: Wiley.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Ray, D. W. , Wandersman, A. , Ellisor, J. , & Huntington, D. E. (1982). The effect of high density in a juvenile correctional institution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 95-108.

11.

Ruback, R. B. , & Carr, T. S. (1984). Crowding in woman's prison: Attitudinal and behavioral effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 57-68.

12.

Ruback, R. B. , & Carr, T. S. (1986). Perceived control in prison: Its relation to reported crowding, stress and symptoms. JournalofAppliedSocialPsychology, 16,375-386.

13.

Skalar, V. (1974). Social climate in the experimental and control institutions. In K. Vodopivec (Ed.), Maladjusted youth: An experiment in rehabilitation. Hampshire, England: D.C. Heath.

14.

Wener, R. E. , & Keys, C. (1988). The effect of changes in jail population densities on crowding, sick call, and spatial behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 852-866.

15.

Wenk, E. A. , & Moos, R. H. (1972). Social climate in prison: An attempt to conceptualize and measure environmental factors in total institutions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 9,134-148.

16.

Wright, K. N. , & Boudouris, J. (1982). An assessment of the Moos Correctional Institutions Environment Scale. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 255-276.