This lab-based study tested whether nature sounds can lead to less stress reactivity, better stress recovery, less stress-induced eating and healthy food choice stimulation, while differentiating between bird and water sounds. Before (5 min) and after (8 min) the Trier Social Stress Test, 59 participants (47% men, 18–30 years) were exposed to one of three soundtracks: birds, streaming water, or wind as control. Group differences were tested on negative affect, salivary cortisol, heart rate variability, hunger, food craving, snack intake and influence expectations. Both bird and water sounds led to better cortisol recovery (not reactivity) and were reported to be more stress-reducing than wind only. The recovery effect was highest for water sounds. No differential sound effects were found for the food variables. The results confirm the potential implementation of bird and water sounds for stress restoration but future research should test the effects (especially on diet) in real-life settings.
AllenA. P.KennedyP. J.DockrayS.CryanJ. F.DinanT. G.ClarkeG. (2017). The Trier Social Stress test: Principles and practice. Neurobiology of Stress, 6, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.11.001
3.
AlvarssonJ. J.WiensS.NilssonM. E. (2010). Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3), 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031036
4.
AnnerstedtM.JönssonP.WallergårdM.JohanssonG.KarlsonB.GrahnP.HansenÅ. M.WährborgP. (2013). Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest — Results from a pilot study. Physiology & Behavior, 118, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.023
5.
BeaulieuK.OustricP.FinlaysonG. (2020). The impact of physical activity on food reward: Review and conceptual synthesis of evidence from observational, acute, and chronic exercise training studies. Current Obesity Reports, 9(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-020-00372-3
BerryM. S.RepkeM. A.MetcalfA. L.JordanK. E. (2020). Promoting healthy decision-making via Natural Environment Exposure: Initial evidence and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01682
9.
BerthoudH. R. (2012). The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, 71(4), 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665112000602
10.
BertoR. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394
11.
BertoR.BarbieroG.BarbieroP.SenesG. (2018). An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments. Some observations about biophilia. Behavioral Sciences, 8(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8030034
12.
BiswasD.LundK.SzocsC. (2019). Sounds like a healthy retail atmospheric strategy: Effects of ambient music and background noise on food sales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47, 37–55.
13.
BlechertJ.MeuleA.BuschN. A.OhlaK. (2014). Food-pics: An image database for experimental research on eating and appetite. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00617
14.
BrownD. K.BartonJ. L.GladwellV. F. (2013). Viewing nature scenes positively affects recovery of autonomic function following acute-mental stress. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(11), 5562–5569. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305019p
15.
BrowningM.Saeidi-RiziF.McAnirlinO.YoonH.PeiY. (2021). The role of methodological choices in the effects of experimental exposure to simulated natural landscapes on human health and cognitive performance: A systematic review. Environment and Behavior, 53(7), 687–731.
BuxtonR. T.PearsonA. L.AllouC.FristrupK.WittemyerG. (2021). A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(14), e2013097118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013097118
18.
CerwénG.PedersenE.PálsdóttirA. M. (2016). The role of Soundscape in nature-based rehabilitation: A patient perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(12), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121229
19.
CohenD. A.BabeyS. H. (2012). Contextual influences on eating behaviours: Heuristic processing and dietary choices. Obesity Reviews, 13(9), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01001.x
20.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6668417
21.
CuiT.XiJ.TangC.SongJ.HeJ.Brytek-MateraA. (2021). The relationship between music and food intake: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients, 13(8), 2571. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082571
DickersonS. S.KemenyM. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355
24.
EpelE.TomiyamaA. J.DallmanM. F. (2012). Stress and reward neural networks, eating, and obesity. In BrownellK.GoldM. (Eds.), Handbook of Food and Addiction (pp. 266–272). Oxford University Press.
25.
FinlaysonG.KingN.BlundellJ. E. (2007). Is it possible to dissociate ‘liking’ and ‘wanting’ for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure. Physiology & Behavior, 90(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.020
26.
FriisR.SkovL. R.OlsenA.AppletonK. M.SaulaisL.DinnellaC.HartwellH.DepezayL.MonteleoneE.GiboreauA.Perez-CuetoF. J. A. (2017). Comparison of three nudge interventions (priming, default option, and perceived variety) to promote vegetable consumption in a self-service buffet setting. PLoS One, 12(5), e0176028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176028
27.
GomezP.DanuserB. (2004). Affective and physiological responses to environmental noises and music. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.02.002
28.
GrazioseM. M.KochP. A.WolfR.GrayH. L.TrentR.ContentoI. R. (2019). Cafeteria noise exposure and fruit and vegetable consumption at school lunch: A cross-sectional study of elementary students. Appetite, 136, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.01.026
29.
GuedesD.PradaM.GarridoM. V.LamyE. (2023). The taste & affect music database: Subjective rating norms for a new set of musical stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01862-z
30.
HagaA.HalinN.HolmgrenM.SörqvistP. (2016). Psychological restoration can depend on stimulus-source attribution: A challenge for the evolutionary account?Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01831
HartigT.KaiserF. G.BowlerP. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973142
33.
HedblomM.GunnarssonB.SchaeferM.KnezI.ThorssonP.LundströmJ. N. (2019). Sounds of nature in the city: No evidence of bird song improving stress recovery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081390
34.
HongJ. Y.JeonJ. Y. (2013). Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3), 2026–2036. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4817924
35.
JahnckeH. (2012). Open-plan office noise: The susceptibility and suitability of different cognitive tasks for work in the presence of irrelevant speech. Noise and Health, 14(61), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.104901
36.
KaiserD.SilberbergerS.HilzendegenC.Stroebele-BenschopN. (2016). (The influence of music type and transmission mode on food intake and meal duration: An experimental study. Psychology of Music, 44(6), 1419–1430.
37.
KangJ. (2012). On the diversity of urban waterscape [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Conference.
38.
KaoC. C.WuW. H.ChiouW. B. (2019). Exposure to nature may Induce lower discounting and lead to healthier dietary choices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101333.
39.
KimH. G.CheonE. J.BaiD. S.LeeY. H.KooB. H. (2018). Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Psychiatry Investigation, 15(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.08.17
40.
KirschbaumC.PirkeK. M.HellhammerD. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’ – A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1-2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004
41.
Largo-WightE.O’HaraB. K.ChenW. W. (2016). The efficacy of a brief nature sound intervention on muscle tension, pulse rate, and self-reported stress: Nature contact micro-break in an office or waiting room. HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715619741
42.
LinY. H. T.HamidN.ShepherdD.KantonoK.SpenceC. (2019). Environmental sounds influence the multisensory perception of chocolate gelati. Foods, 8(4), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8040124
43.
LinY. H. T.HamidN.ShepherdD.KantonoK.SpenceC. (2022). Musical and Non-Musical sounds influence the flavour perception of chocolate ice cream and emotional responses. Foods, 11(12), 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121784
44.
LiuF.LiuP.KangJ.MengQ.WuY.YangD. (2022). Relationships between landscape characteristics and the restorative quality of soundscapes in urban blue spaces. Applied Acoustics, 189, 108600.
45.
LiZ.KangJ. (2019). Sensitivity analysis of changes in human physiological indicators observed in soundscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 190, 103593.
46.
LuoJ.WangM.ChenL. (2021). The effects of using a nature-sound mobile application on psychological well-being and cognitive performance among university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 699908. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.699908
47.
MachtM. (2008). How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite, 50(1), 1–11.
48.
MathiesenS. L.HopiaA.OjansivuP.ByrneD. V.WangQ. J. (2022). The sound of silence: Presence and absence of sound affects meal duration and hedonic eating experience. Appetite, 174, 106011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106011
49.
MathiesenS. L.Moula-StahliD.ByrneD. V.WangQ. J. (2022). Leaving your comfort zone for healthier eating? Situational factors influence the desire to eat comfort food and simulated energy intake. Food Quality and Preference, 100, 104605.
50.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M.Bruehlman-SenecalE.DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643.
51.
McMahanE. A.EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 507–519.
52.
MeuleA.ReichenbergerJ.BlechertJ. (2018). Development and preliminary validation of the Salzburg Stress Eating Scale. Appetite, 120, 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.003
53.
MichelsN.DebraG.MattheeuwsL.HooybergA. (2022). Indoor nature integration for stress recovery and healthy eating: A picture experiment with plants versus green color. Environmental Research, 212(Pt E), 113643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113643
54.
MorganJ. F.ReidF.LaceyJ. H. (1999). The SCOFF questionnaire: Assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ, 319(7223), 1467–1468. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467
Peng-LiD.AlvesDaMotaP.CorreaC. M. C.ChanR. C. K.ByrneD. V.WangQ. J. (2022). Sound” decisions: The combined role of ambient noise and Cognitive Regulation on the neurophysiology of food cravings. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 827021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.827021
58.
Peng-LiD.AndersenT.FinlaysonG.ByrneD. V.WangQ. J. (2022). The impact of environmental sounds on food reward. Physiology & Behavior, 245, 113689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113689
59.
RatcliffeE. (2021). Sound and soundscape in restorative natural environments: A narrative literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 570563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570563
60.
RatcliffeE.GaterslebenB.SowdenP. T. (2013). Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 221–228.
61.
RatcliffeE.GaterslebenB.SowdenP. T. (2016). Associations with bird sounds: How do they relate to perceived restorative potential?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 136–144.
62.
RatcliffeE.GaterslebenB.SowdenP. T. (2020). Predicting the perceived restorative potential of bird sounds through acoustics and aesthetics. Environment and Behavior, 52(4), 371–400.
63.
RosaC. D.ColladoS. (2019). Experiences in nature and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Setting the ground for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00763
64.
SchlotzW.KumstaR.LayesI.EntringerS.JonesA.WüstS. (2008). Covariance between psychological and endocrine responses to pharmacological challenge and psychosocial stress: A question of timing. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(7), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0b013e3181810658
65.
ShawB.CoyleA.GaterslebenB.UngarS. (2015). Exploring nature experiences of people with visual impairments / vivir la naturaleza con una discapacidad visual. Psyecology, 6(3), 287–327.
66.
ShuS.MaH. (2020). Restorative effects of urban park soundscapes on children’s psychophysiological stress. Applied Acoustics, 164, 107293.
67.
SpenceC.Reinoso-CarvalhoF.VelascoC.WangQ. J. (2019). Extrinsic auditory contributions to food perception & consumer behaviour: An interdisciplinary review. Multisensory Research, 32(4-5), 275–318. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20191403
68.
SpendrupS.HunterE.IsgrenE. (2016). Exploring the relationship between nature sounds, connectedness to nature, mood and willingness to buy sustainable food: A retail field experiment. Appetite, 100, 133–141.
69.
ThomaM. V.MewesR.NaterU. M. (2018). Preliminary evidence: The stress-reducing effect of listening to water sounds depends on somatic complaints: A randomized trial. Medicine, 97(8), e9851. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009851
70.
TsutsumiM.NogakiH.ShimizuY.StoneT. E.KobayashiT. (2017). Individual reactions to viewing preferred video representations of the natural environment: A comparison of mental and physical reactions. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 14(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12131
71.
Twohig-BennettC.JonesA. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
72.
VanCauterE.LeproultR.KupferD. J. (1996). Effects of gender and age on the levels and circadian rhythmicity of plasma cortisol. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 81(7), 2468–2473. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.81.7.246810.1210/jcem.81.7.8675562
73.
van Den BergA. E.van Den BergC. G. (2011). A comparison of children with ADHD in a natural and built setting. Child Care Health and Development, 37(3), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01172.x
74.
Van HedgerS. C.NusbaumH. C.ClohisyL.JaeggiS. M.BuschkuehlM.BermanM. G. (2019). Of cricket chirps and car horns: The effect of nature sounds on cognitive performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 522–530. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1539-1
75.
VilímekZ.KantorJ.KrejčíJ.JanečkaZ.JedličkováZ.NekardováA.BotekM.BucharováM.CampbellE. A. (2022). The effect of low frequency sound on heart rate variability and subjective perception: A randomized crossover study. Healthcare, 10(6), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061024
76.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
77.
WattsG.MarafaL. (2017). Validation of the tranquillity rating prediction tool (TRAPT): Comparative studies in UK and Hong Kong. Noise Mapping, 4, 67–74.
78.
XuY.HamidN.ShepherdD.KantonoK.ReayS.MartinezG.SpenceC. (2019). Background soundscapes influence the perception of ice-cream as indexed by electrophysiological measures. Food Research International, 125, 108564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108564
79.
YangW.MakitaK.NakaoT.KanayamaN.MachizawaM. G.SasaokaT.SugataA.KobayashiR.HiramotoR.YamawakiS.IwanagaM.MiyataniM. (2018). Affective auditory stimulus database: An expanded version of the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-E). Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1415–1429. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1027-6
80.
ZelenskiJ. M.DopkoR. L.CapaldiC. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005
81.
ZhaoJ.XuW.YeL. (2018). Effects of auditory-visual combinations on perceived restorative potential of urban green space. Applied Acoustics, 141, 169–177.
82.
ZhaoW.LiH.ZhuX.GeT. (2020). Effect of birdsong soundscape on perceived restorativeness in an urban park. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165659
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
