Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-2
Are Some Natural Environments More Psychologically Beneficial Than Others? The Importance of Type and Quality on Connectedness to Nature and Psychological Restoration
Exposure to nature can strengthen an individual’s sense of connectedness (i.e., emotional/cognitive bonds to the natural world) and enhance psychological restoration (e.g., feeling relaxed/refreshed). To date, there have been few large studies looking at the role that type and quality of natural environments may have on these outcomes. The present study used data from a large survey in England (sample analyzed = 4,515), which asked participants to recall a recent visit to nature. After controlling for covariates, respondents recalled greater connectedness to nature and restoration following visits to rural and coastal locations compared with urban green space, and to sites of higher environmental quality (operationalized by protected/designated area status, for example, nature reserves). A series of structural equation analyses provided evidence for a bidirectional association between connectedness and restoration. Consideration of the psychological benefits associated with different types and quality of environment has implications for human health, environmental management, and conservation.
BartonJ.PrettyJ. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 3947-3955. doi:10.1021/es903183r
2.
BermanM. G.JonidesJ.KaplanS. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
3.
BertoR. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249-259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
4.
BraggE. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93-108. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0008
5.
CapaldiC. A.DopkoR. L.ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Article 976. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1996). Physical activity and health. A report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
CervinkaR.RödererK.HeflerE. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379-388. doi:10.1177/1359105311416873
8.
CoombesE. G.JonesA. P. (2010). Assessing the impact of climate change on visitor behaviour and habitat use at the coast: A UK case study. Global Environmental Change, 20, 303-313. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.12.004
9.
CoxD. T. C.ShanahanD. F.HudsonH. L.PlummerK. E.SiriwardenaG. M.FullerR. A.. . . GastonK. J. (2017). Doses of neighborhood nature: Benefits for mental health of living with nature. Bioscience, 67, 147-155. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw173
10.
CracknellD.WhiteM. P.PahlS.NicholsW. J.DepledgeM. H. (2015). Marine biota and psychological well-being: A preliminary examination of dose–response effects in an aquarium setting. Environment and Behavior, 48, 1242-1269. doi:10.1177/0013916515597512
11.
DallimerM.IrvineK. N.SkinnerA. M. J.DaviesZ. G.RouquetteJ. R.MaltbyL. L.. . . GastonK. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience, 62, 47-55. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
12.
DavisJ. L.GreenJ. D.ReedA. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 173-180. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001
13.
Department of Health. (2004). At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. A report from the chief medical officer. London, UK: Author.
14.
DutcherD. D.FinleyJ. C.LuloffA. E.Buttolph JohnsonJ. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474-493. doi:10.1177/0013916506298794
15.
European Union. (2014). General union environment action programme to 2020: Living well, within the limits of our planet. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
16.
FelstenG. (2009). Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 160-167. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.006
17.
FredricksonB. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
18.
FullerR. A.IrvineK. N.Devine-WrightP.WarrenP. H.GastonK. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390-394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
19.
HaluzaD.SimicS.HöltgeJ.CervinkaR.MoshammerH. (2014). Connectedness to nature and public (skin) health perspectives: Results of a representative, population-based survey among Austrian residents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 1176-1191. doi:10.3390/ijerph110101176
20.
HansmannR.HugS.-M.SeelandK. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Planning, 6, 213-225. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004
21.
HindsJ.SparksP. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109-120. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001
22.
HolmesS. J. (2003). Some lives and some theories. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
23.
HowellA. J.DopkoR. L.PassmoreH. A.BuroK. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166-171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
JohanssonM.HartigT.StaatsH. (2011). Psychological benefits of walking: Moderation by company and outdoor environment. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 3, 261-280.
KalsE.SchumacherD.MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056
28.
KaplanS.BermanM. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43-57. doi:10.1177/1745691609356784
29.
KaplanS.KaplanR. (1983). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. Ann Arbor, MI: Ulrich’s.
30.
KnightA. J. (2008). “Bats, snakes and spiders, oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 94-103. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001
31.
LaumannK.GärlingT.StormarkK. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 31-44. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
32.
LearyM. R.TipsordJ. M.TateE. B. (2008). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self. In WaymentH. A.BauerJ. J. (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego. Decade of behavior (pp. 137-147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
Lindemann-MatthiesP.JungeX.MatthiesD. (2010). The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biological Conservation, 143, 195-202. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003
34.
LoughlandT.ReidA.WalkerK.PetoczP. (2003). Factors influencing young people’s conceptions of environment. Environmental Education Research, 9, 3-19. doi:10.1080/13504620303471
35.
LuckG. W.DavidsonP.BoxallD.SmallboneL. (2011). Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conservation Biology, 25, 816-826. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x
36.
MacKerronG.MouratoS. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23, 992-1000. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
37.
MaguireG. S.MillerK. K.WestonM. A.YoungK. (2011). Being beside the seaside: Beach use and preferences among coastal residents of south-eastern Australia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54, 781-788. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.07.012
38.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
39.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. P.Bruehlman-SenecalE.DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607-643. doi:10.1177/0013916508319745
40.
McMahanE. A.EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507-519. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.994224
41.
Natural England. (2015). Monitor of engagement with the natural environment: The national survey on people and the natural environment. Annual report from the 2013-14 survey (JP009). Retrieved from http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6579788732956672? category=47018
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101-1106. doi:10.1177/0956797611418527
44.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303-322. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
45.
PerkinsH. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 455-463. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
46.
PettT. J.ShwartzA.IrvineK. N.DallimerM.DaviesZ. G. (2016). Unpacking the people–biodiversity paradox: A conceptual framework. Bioscience, 66, 576-583. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw036
47.
PrettyJ.PeacockJ.SellensM.GriffinM. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15, 319-337. doi:10.1080/09603120500155963
48.
RichardsonM.CormackA.McRobertL.UnderhillR. (2016). 30 days Wild: Development and evaluation of a large-scale nature engagement campaign to improve well-being. PLoS One, 11(2), e0149777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149777
49.
SchipperijnJ.EkholmO.StigsdotterU. K.ToftagerM.BentsenP.Kamper-JørgensenF.RandrupT. B. (2010). Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 130-137. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010
50.
ShanahanD. F.LinB. B.GastonK. J.BushR.FullerR. A. (2014). Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: A case study from Brisbane, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130, 14-23. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.005
51.
TamK. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64-78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
52.
TuanY. F. (1974). Topophilia. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
53.
TuanY. F. (1977). Space and place. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
54.
UlrichR. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
55.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
56.
WeinsteinN.BalmfordA.DeHaanC. R.GladwellV.BradburyR. B.AmanoT. (2015). Seeing community for the trees: The links among contact with natural environments, community cohesion, and crime. Bioscience, 65, 1141-1153. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv151
57.
WeinsteinN.PrzybylskiA. K.RyanR. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1315-1329. doi:10.1177/0146167209341649
58.
WheelerB. W.LovellR.HigginsS. L.WhiteM. P.AlcockI.OsborneN. J.. . . DepledgeM. H. (2015). Beyond greenspace: An ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality. International Journal of Health Geographics, 14. Article 17. doi:10.1186/s12942-015-0009-5
59.
WhiteM.SmithA.HumphryesK.PahlS.SnellingD.DepledgeM. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 482-493. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004
60.
WhiteM. P.PahlS.AshbullbyK.HerbertS.DepledgeM. H. (2013). Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 40-51. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002
61.
WhiteM. P.PahlS.WheelerB. W.DepledgeM. H.FlemingL. E. F. (2017). Natural environments and subjective well-being: Different types of nature exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health & Place, 45, 77-84. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.008
62.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
63.
WolskoC.LindbergK. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5, 80-91. doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0008
64.
WylesK. J.PahlS.ThomasK.ThompsonR. C. (2016). Factors that can undermine the psychological benefits of coastal environments: Exploring the effect of tidal state, presence, and type of litter. Environment and Behavior, 48, 1095-1126. doi:10.1177/0013916515592177
65.
ZelenskiJ. M.NisbetE. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0013916512451901
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
