Contact with nature can have numerous beneficial effects for children. As the school is a place where children spend a lot of time, the physical environment of the school has considerable potential to influence children. This study investigated the influence of a redesign (greening) of a schoolyard on pupils’ physiological stress, psychological well-being, and executive functioning. A pre–post, quasi-experimental design with a multimethod approach was applied. One-hundred thirty-three middle school pupils (M = 14.4 years) of three middle schools in a rural area in Austria were assessed. The renovated schoolyard significantly diminished pupils’ physiological stress levels and enhanced their psychological well-being. Pupils in the renovated schoolyard setting also perceived the environment as more restorative following the redesign. However, it did not affect executive functioning as hypothesized. Limitations of the study and future research opportunities are discussed.
AbelM. H.SewellJ. (1999). Stress and burnout in rural and urban secondary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 287-293. doi:10.1080/00220679909597608
2.
BellA. C.DymentJ. E. (2008). Grounds for health: The intersection of green school grounds and health-promoting schools. Environmental Education Research, 14, 77-90. doi:10.1080/13504620701843426
3.
BermanM. G.JonidesJ.KaplanS. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225
4.
ColeyR. L.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment & Behavior, 29, 468-494. doi:10.1177/001391659702900402
5.
EberhardJ. P. (2009). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62(6):753-756. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001
6.
ElsleyS. (2004). Children’s experience of public space. Children & Society, 18, 155-164. doi:10.1002/chi.822
7.
Faber TaylorA.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment & Behavior, 33, 54-77. doi:10.1177/00139160121972864
8.
FanJ.McCandlissB. D.SommerT.RazM.PosnerM. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347. doi:10.1162/089892902317361886
9.
HartigT.EvansG. W. (1993). Psychological foundations of nature experience. In GärlingT.GolledgeR. G. (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches (pp. 427-457). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
10.
HartigT. A.MangM.EvansG. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment & Behavior, 23, 3-26. doi:10.1177/0013916591231001
11.
HartigT.EvansG. W.JammerL. D.DavisD. S.GärlingT. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
HerringtonS.StudtmannK. (1998). Landscape interventions: New directions for the design of children’s outdoor play environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 191-205. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00087-5
15.
HobiV. (1985). Basler Befindlichkeitsskala [Basler Well-Being Questionnaire]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.
KallusK. W. (1995). Erholungs-Belastungs-Fragebogen (EBF). Handanweisung [Recovery-Stress-Questionnaire. Manual]. Frankfurt, Germany: Swets Test Services.
18.
KaplanR. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 241-248. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
19.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KaplanS.BermanM. C. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43-57. doi:10.1177/1745691609356784
KorpelaK. M. (2002). Children’s environments. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 363-373). New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
LaumannK.GärlingT.StormarkK. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental psychology, 23, 125-134. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-X
24.
LlabreM. M.IronsonG. H.SpitzerS. B.GellmanM. D.WeidlerD. J.SchneidermanN. (2007). How many blood pressure measurements are enough? An application of generalizability theory to the study of blood pressure reliability. Psychophysiology, 25, 97-106. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00967
Loukaitou-SiderisA. (2003). Children’s common grounds: A study of intergroup relations among children in public settings. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 130-143. doi:10.1080/01944360308976302
27.
MatsuokaR. H.KaplanR. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of Landscape and Urban Planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 7-19. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
28.
ParsonsR.TassinaryL. G.UlrichR. S.HeblM. R.Grossman-AlexanderM. (1998). The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113-139. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0086
29.
TanabeJ.MishimaK.FujiiE. (2005). Effects of the lawn in a schoolyard on pupils’ play. The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 68, 943-946.
30.
TennessenC. M.CimprichB. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77-85. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0
31.
UlrichR. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4, 17-23. doi:10.1080/01426397908705892
32.
UlrichR. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment & Behavior, 13, 523-556. doi:10.1177/0013916581135001
33.
UlrichR. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Human behavior and the environment (Vol. 6., pp. 85-125) New York, NY: Plenum Press.
34.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. W.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
35.
Van den BergA. E.HartigT.StaatsH. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 79-96. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x
36.
Van den BergA. E.KooleS. L.Van der WulpN. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 135-146. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1
37.
WellsN. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effect of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment & Behavior, 32, 775-793. doi:10.1177/00139160021972793
38.
WellsN. M.EvansG. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35, 311-330. doi:10.1177/0013916503035003001
39.
WohlwillJ. F. (1966). The physical environment: A problem for a psychology of stimulation. Journal of Social Issues, 22, 29-38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1966.tb00546.x
