Research in environmental psychology has found a positive relationship between place bonds and behaviors related to care and maintenance of place. Although this relationship has been analyzed in natural environments, it has been less frequently studied in urban environments and has yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study is to analyze behavior related to care and conservation of neighborhood and its possible relationship to place bonds, as well as to other variables that we think may be important in explaining this behavior. The participants were 407 residents from eight different neighborhoods with different sociodemographic characteristics in one Spanish city. The results indicate that the relationship between attachment and behavior is significant only in residents with higher socioeconomic levels. These findings may help to explain the contradictory results found in the literature. Other variables which are significant in explaining neighborhood care are social norms, residential satisfaction, and support for protection policies. Place identity was not found to be significantly correlated with neighborhood care.
BernardoF.Palma-OliveiraJ. M. (2016a). Urban neighbourhoods and intergroup relations: The importance of place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 239–251.
5.
BernardoF.Palma-OliveiraJ. M. (2016b). Identification with the neighborhood: Discrimination and neighborhood size. Self and Identity, 15(5), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1178665
6.
BerroetaH.RamonedaA.OpazoL. (2015). Sentido de comunidad, participación y apego de lugar en comunidades desplazadas y no desplazadas postdesastres: Chaitén y Consitución. Universitas Psychologica, 14(4), 1221. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.up14-4.scpa
7.
BonaiutoM.AielloA.PeruginiM.BonnesM.ErcolaniA. P. (1999). Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0138
8.
BonaiutoM.BilottaE.BonnesM.CeccarelliM.MartorellaH.CarrusG. (2008). Local identity moderating the role of individual differences in natural resource use: The case of water consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(4), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00333.x
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss (Volume 1: Attachment). Hogarth.
10.
BrownG.BrownB. B.PerkinsD. D. (2004a). New housing as neighborhood revitalization: Place attachment and confidence among residents. Environment and Behavior, 36(6), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503254823
11.
BrownB.PerkinsD. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In AltmanI.LowS. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). Plenum Press.
12.
BrownB.PerkinsD. D.BrownG. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00117-2
13.
BrownB.PerkinsD.BrownG. (2004b). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.01.001
14.
CarrusG.BonaiutoM.BonnesM. (2005). Environmental concern, regional identity and support for protected areas in Italy. Environment and Behavior, 37(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269644
15.
CarrusG.ScopellitiM.FornaraF.BonnesM.BonaiutoM. (2014). Place attachment, community identification, and pro-environmental engagement. In ManzoL. C.Devine-WrightP. (Eds.), Place attachment. Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 154–164). Routledge.
16.
CasakinH.BilligM. (2009). Effect of settlement size and religiosity on sense of place in communal settlements. Environment and Behavior, 41(6), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508329944
17.
CasakinH.HernándezB.RuizC. (2015). Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size. Cities, 42, 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.07.007
18.
Chamlee-WrightE.StorrV. H. (2009). “There’s no place like New Orleans”: Sense of place and community recovery in the Ninth Ward after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(5), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00479.x
19.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgreenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
20.
ColladoS.StaatsH.SanchoP. (2018). Normative influences on adolescents’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of parents and friends. Environment and Behavior, 51(3), 288–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517744591
21.
Corral-VerdugoV.Frías-ArmentaM.Pérez-UríasF.Orduña-CabreraV.Espinoza-GallegoN. (2002). Residential water consumption, motivation for conserving water, and the continuing tragedy of commons. Environment Management, 30(4), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2599-5
22.
Devine-WrightP. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind energy, 8(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124
23.
DixonJ.DurrheimK. (2000). Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164318
24.
DixonJ.DurrheimK. (2004). Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.004
25.
GiulianiM. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In BonnesM.LeeT.BonaiutoM. (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137–170). Ashgate.
26.
GuoJ. Y.BhatC. R. (2007). Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: Application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(1), 1, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.11.001
27.
HalpennyE. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.006
28.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
29.
HernándezB.HidalgoM. C.RuizC. (2014). Theoretical and methodological aspects of research on place attachment. In ManzoL.Devine-WrightP. (Eds.), Place attachment, advances in theory, methods and applications. Routledge.
30.
HernándezB.HidalgoM. C.Salazar-LaplaceM. E.HessS. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
31.
HernándezB.MartínA. M.RuizC.HidalgoM. C. (2010). The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.009
HidalgoM. C.HernándezB. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
34.
HidalgoM. C.HernándezB.MorenoP. (2015). Does neighborhood attachment mean to care for and to maintain it?IAPS Bulletin, 43, 24–27.
35.
HurM.NasarJ. L. (2014). Physical upkeep, perceived upkeep, fear of crime and neighborhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.001
36.
JefferyC. R. (1971). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, Sage.
37.
KaltenbornB. P. (1998). Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts: A study among residents in Svalbard in the Norwegian high Arctic. Applied Geography, 18(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-6228(98)00002-2
38.
LewickaM. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.004
39.
LewickaM. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004
40.
LewickaM. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
41.
Longhinotti-FelippeM.KuhnenA. (2012a). Environmental care and place attachment: Perspectives for sustainability in schools. Psyecology, 3(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119712800337846
42.
Longhinotti-FelippeM.KuhnenA. (2012b). O apego ao lugar no contexto dos estudos pessoa-ambiente: práticas de pesquisa. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 29(4), 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2012000400015
43.
ManzoL. C.PerkinsD. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412205286160
44.
MihinjacM.SavilleG. (2020). Crime and fear in Hollygrove—Building neighbourhood resilience. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1719534
45.
MoserG.RatioE.Fleury-BahiG. (2002). Appropriation and interpersonal relationships: From dwelling to city through the neighborhood. Environment and Behavior, 34(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034001009
46.
PerkinsD. D.LongD. A. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital. In FisherA. T.SonnC. C.BishopB. J. (Eds.), Psychological sense of community (pp. 291–318). Springer.
47.
RamkissoonH.WeilerB.SmithL. (2012). Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: The development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.602194
48.
RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104
RuizC.Hernández-FernaudE.Rolo-GonzálezG.HernándezB. (2019). Neighbourhoods’ evaluation: Influence on well-being variables. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1736.
51.
RuizC.HernandezBHidalgoM. C. (2011). Confirmation of the factorial structure of neighbourhood attachment and neighbourhood identity scale. Psyecology, 2(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119711795712513
52.
SavilleG. (2018). SafeGrowth: Building neighborhoods of safety & livability. AlterNation LLC. Printed by CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, An Amazon Company.
53.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2010a). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
54.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2010b). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.010
55.
SchultzP. W.KaiserF. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In ClaytonS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556–580). Oxford University Press.
SmithS. J.CigdemM.OngR.WoodG. (2017). Wellbeing at the edges of ownership. Environment and Planning A, 49(5), 1080–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16688471
58.
StedmanR. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitudes, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001
59.
ThøgersenJ. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behavior: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004
60.
UzzellD.PolE.BadenasD. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior, 34(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034001003
61.
ValeraS.Pérez-TejeraF.AngueraM. T.SiciliaL. (2018). Evaluating the uses and environmental characteristics of 40 public parks and squares in Barcelona by means of systematic observation. Psyecology, 9(2), 118–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2018.1432525
62.
VaskeJ. J.KobrinK. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598658
63.
VorkinnM.RieseH. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972972
64.
WalkerA. J.RyanR. L. (2008). Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.001
65.
WalkerG. J.ChapmanR. (2003). Thinking like a park: The effects of sense of place, perspective-taking and empathy on pro-environmental intentions. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(1), 59–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
