Pro-environmental behavioral patterns are influenced by relevant others’ actions and expectations. Studies about the intergenerational transmission of environmentalism have demonstrated that parents play a major role in their children’s pro-environmental actions. However, little is known about how other social agents may shape youth’s environmentalism. This cross-sectional study concentrates on the role that parents and peers have in the regulation of 12- to 19-year-olds’ pro-environmental behaviors. We also consider the common response bias effect by examining the associations between parents, peers, and adolescents’ pro-environmentalism in two independent data sets. Data Set 1 (N = 330) includes adolescents’ perceptions of relevant others’ behaviors. Data Set 2 (N = 152) includes relevant others’ self-reported pro-environmental behavior. Our results show that parents’ and peers’ descriptive and injunctive norms have a direct effect on adolescents’ pro-environmental behavior and an indirect one, through personal norms. Adolescents seem to be accurate in the perception of their close ones’ environmental actions.
AartsH.DijksterhuisA. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18-28. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.18
2.
AjzenI. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
3.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BakerC. W.LittleT. D.BrownellK. D. (2003). Predicting adolescent eating and activity behaviors: The role of social norms and personal agency. Health Psychology, 22, 189-198. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.189
8.
BallK.JefferyR. W.AbbottG.McNaughtonS. A.CrawfordD. (2010). Is healthy behavior contagious: Associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, Article 86. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-86
9.
BambergS.HuneckeM.BlöbaumA. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 190-203. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001
10.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
11.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
BanduraA. (1997). Self efficacy. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
13.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
BorsariM. S.CareyK. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 64, 331-341. doi:10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331
15.
BrattC. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31, 630-656. doi:10.1177/00139169921972272
16.
BronfenbrennerU.EvansG. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9, 115-135. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00114
17.
CasalóL. V.EscarioJ. J. (2016). Intergenerational association of environmental concern: Evidence of parents’ and children’s concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 65-74. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.001
18.
ChawlaL. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 6-23.
19.
ChawlaL.DerrV. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In ClaytonS. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 527-555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
ChengJ. C.MonroeM. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44, 31-49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082
21.
CialdiniR. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
23.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
24.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
25.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R.NewsomJ. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318-328. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318
26.
CorralizaJ. A.ColladoS.BethelmyL. (2013). Spanish version of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for children. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1-8. doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.46
27.
De MolJ.BuysseA. (2008). The phenomenology of children’s influence on parents. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 163-193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00424.x
28.
DuarteR.EscarioJ. J.SanagustínM. V. (2017). The influence of the family, the school, and the group on the environmental attitudes of European students. Environmental Education Research, 23, 23-42. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1074660
29.
DunlapR.Van LiereK. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19. doi:10.3200/JOEE.40.1.19-28
30.
DunlapR.Van LiereK.MertigA.JonesR. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176
31.
FalkA.ZimmermannF. (2013). A taste of consistency and survey response behavior. CESifo Economic Studies, 59, 181-193. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifs039
32.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
34.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk talking, risk preference, and risk decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625-635. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
35.
GöckeritzS.SchultzP. W.RendonT.CialdiniR.GoldsteinN.GriskeviciusV. (2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 514-523. doi:10.1002/ejsp.643
36.
GotschiE.VogelS.LindenthalT.LarcherM. (2010). The role of knowledge, social norms, and attitudes toward organic products and shopping behavior: Survey results from high school students in Vienna. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41, 88-100. doi:10.1080/00958960903295225
37.
Grodzinska-JurczarkM.BartosiewiczA.TwardowskaA. (2003). Evaluating the impact of school waste education programme upon students’, parents’ and teachers’ environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12, 106-122. doi:10.1080/10382040308667521
38.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 414-421. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002
39.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 292-302. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.001
40.
HarlandP.StaatsH.WilkeM. (1999). Explaining pro-environmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505-2528. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x
41.
HarlandP.StaatsH.WilkeM. (2007). Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 323-334. doi:10.1080/01973530701665058
42.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
43.
HussarK.HorvathJ. (2011). Do children play fair with nature? Understanding children’s judgments of environmentally harmful actions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 309-313. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.001
44.
KahnP. H. (1997). Children’s moral and ecological reasoning about the Prince William Sound oil spill. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1091-1096.
45.
KahnP. H.LourencoO. (2002). Water, air, fire, and earth: A developmental study in Portugal of environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 34, 405-430. doi:10.1177/00116502034004001
46.
KaiserF.HübnerG.BognerF. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2150-2170. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02213.x
47.
KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012. doi:10.1177/01461672002610009
48.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York, NY: Guilford.
49.
KohlbergL. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
50.
LambM. E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 23-42. doi:10.1300/J002v29n02_03
51.
MaccobyE. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical review. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006-1017. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1006
52.
MaccobyE. E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 13-41). New York, NY: Guilford.
53.
MagantoJ.-M.BartauI.EtxeberríaJ. (2004). Family co-responsibility programme (COFAMI): How to promote children’s cooperation and responsibility. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 27, 417-423. doi:10.1174/0210370042396940
54.
MatthiesE.SelgeS.KlöcknerC. (2012). The role of parental behavior for the development of behavior specific environmental norms: The example of recycling and re-use behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 277-284. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003
55.
MeeusenC. (2014). The intergenerational transmission of environmental concern: The influence of parents and communication patterns within the family. Journal of Environmental Education, 45, 77-90. doi:10.1080/00958964.2013.846290
56.
MullenB.HuL. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1988.tb00836.x
57.
MusickK.SeltzerJ. A.SchwartzC. R. (2007). Neighborhood norms and substance use among teens. Social Science Research, 37, 138-155. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.02.003
58.
ParkW. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 102-111.
59.
PerkinsH. W.LinkenbachJ. W.LewisM. A.NeighborsC. (2010). Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: A statewide campaign. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 866-874. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.05.004
60.
PerkinsW. (2002). Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 164-172. doi:10.15288/jsas.202.s14.164
61.
PiagetJ. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
62.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243
63.
RickinsonM. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education. Environmental Research, 7, 207-320. doi:10.1080/13504620120065230
64.
RogoffB.ParadiseR.ArauzR. M.Correa-ChavezM.AngelilloC. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 175-203. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
65.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford.
66.
SchultzP. W.KaiserF. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental behavior. In ClaytonS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556-580). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68.
SchwartzS. H.HowardJ. A. (1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In StaubE.Bar-TalD.KarylowskiJ.ReykowskiJ. (Eds.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior (pp. 229-255). New York, NY: Plenum.
69.
Smith-McLallenA.FishbeinM. (2008). Predictors of intentions to perform six cancer-related behaviors: Roles for injunctive and descriptive norms. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 13, 389-401. doi:10.1080/13548500701842933
70.
SobelD. (2008). Childhood and nature. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
71.
StaatsH. (2003). Understanding proenvironmental attitudes and behavior: An analysis and review of research based on the theory of planned behavior. In BonnesM.LeeT.BonaiutoM. (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 171-201). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
72.
StaatsH.JansenL.ThøgersenJ. (2011). Greening the greenhouse grower: A behavioral analysis of a sector-initiated system to reduce the environmental load of greenhouses. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2461-2469. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.007
73.
SternP. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
74.
TanakaJ. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In BollenK. A. (Ed.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
75.
ThøgersenJ. (1996). Recycling and morality: A critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536-558. doi:10.1177/0013916596284006
76.
ThøgersenJ. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2
77.
ThøgersenJ. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behavior: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 247-261. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004
78.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
79.
UllmanJ. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In TabachnickB.FidellL. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709-812). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
80.
VeselyS.KlöcknerC. (2018). Global social norms and environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 50, 247-272. doi:10.1177/0013916517702190
81.
WellsN.LekiesK. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16, 2-25.
82.
WenzelM. (2005). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 862-883. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.02.002
83.
ZintM. (2012). Advancing environmental program evaluation: Insights from a review of behavioral outcome variables. In DillonA. WallsBrodyM.StevensonB. (Eds.), International handbook of research in environmental education (pp. 298-309). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
